Hagemann G, Eichbaum G, Stamm G
Abteilung Diagnostische Radiologie I, Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover.
Aktuelle Radiol. 1998 May;8(3):151-6.
The following four screen film combinations were compared: a) a combination of anticrossover film and UV-light emitting screens, b) a combination of blue-light emitting screens and film and c) two conventional green fluorescing screen film combinations. Radiographs of a specially designed plexiglass phantom (0.2 x 0.2 x 0.12 m3) with bar patterns of lead and plaster and of air, respectively were obtained using the following parameters: 12 pulse generator, 0.6 mm focus size, 4.7 mm aluminum prefilter, a grid with 40 lines/cm (12:1) and a focus-detector distance of 1.15 m. Image analysis was performed using an Ibas system and a Zeiss Kontron computer. Display conditions were the following: display distance 0.12 m, a vario film objective 35/70 (Zeiss), a video camera tube with a PbO photocathode, 625 lines (Siemens Heimann), an Ibas image matrix of 512 x 512 pixels with a spatial resolution of ca. 7 cycles/mm, the projected matrix area was 5000 micron 2. Maxima in the histograms of a grouped bar pattern were estimated as mean values from the bar and gap regions ("mean value method"). They were used to calculate signal contrast, standard deviations of the means and scatter fraction. Comparing the histograms with respect to spatial resolution and kV setting a clear advantage of the UVR system becomes obvious. The quantitative analysis yielded a maximum spatial resolution of approx. 3 cycles/mm for the UVR system at 60 kV which decreased to half of this value at 117 kV caused by the increasing influence of scattered radiation. A ranking of screen-film systems with respect to image quality and dose requirement is presented. For its evaluation an interactive image analysis using the mean value method was found to be superior to signal/noise ratio measurements and visual analysis in respect to diagnostic relevance and saving of time.
对以下四种增感屏 - 胶片组合进行了比较:a)防交叉胶片与紫外线发光增感屏的组合,b)蓝光发光增感屏与胶片的组合,以及c)两种传统的绿色荧光增感屏 - 胶片组合。使用以下参数获得了一个专门设计的有机玻璃模型(0.2×0.2×0.12立方米)的射线照片,该模型分别具有铅、石膏和空气的条形图案:12脉冲发生器,0.6毫米焦点尺寸,4.7毫米铝质前置滤线器,40线/厘米(12:1)的滤线栅以及1.15米的焦点 - 探测器距离。使用Ibas系统和蔡司康强计算机进行图像分析。显示条件如下:显示距离0.12米,可变胶片物镜35/70(蔡司),带有PbO光电阴极的摄像管,625线(西门子海曼),512×512像素的Ibas图像矩阵,空间分辨率约为7周期/毫米,投影矩阵面积为5000平方微米。分组条形图案直方图中的最大值被估计为条形和间隙区域的平均值(“平均值法”)。它们被用于计算信号对比度、平均值的标准偏差和散射分数。比较关于空间分辨率和千伏设置的直方图,UVR系统的明显优势变得显而易见。定量分析得出,UVR系统在60千伏时的最大空间分辨率约为3周期/毫米,在117千伏时由于散射辐射影响增加,该值降至其一半。给出了增感屏 - 胶片系统在图像质量和剂量要求方面的排名。就诊断相关性和节省时间而言,发现使用平均值法进行交互式图像分析在评估方面优于信噪比测量和视觉分析。