• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生是否会因一场关于胸痛的公众宣传活动而改变他们对患者的院前管理?

Do physicians modify their prehospital management of patients in response to a public campaign on chest pain?

作者信息

Gaspoz J M, Lovis C, Green Y, Héliot C, Mischler S, Séchaud L, Unger P F

机构信息

Clinique de Médecine II, Department of Medicine, Hôpital Cantonal Universitaire, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1998 Jun 15;81(12):1433-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00202-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00202-1
PMID:9645893
Abstract

The goals of this study were to analyze the impact of a public campaign on chest pain on physicians involved in the prehospital care of patients with this symptom, in terms of physician delay, rates of immediate hospitalization, and of transportation by ambulance. Prehospital delays and decisions for all 866 patients with chest pain managed by the community and generalist physicians or by emergency physicians, who presented to the emergency department of a teaching hospital during the 12 months of the campaign, were compared with those of all 749 patients with similar presentations during the 12 months before it. When community and generalist physicians were involved, median (110 minutes) physician delay did not decrease during the campaign, whereas it decreased from 65 to 56 minutes (p <0.003) when emergency physicians were involved. Rates of immediate hospitalization (73%) and of transportation by ambulance (47%) of patients managed by community and generalist physicians were unaffected by the campaign, whereas they increased from 96% and 89%, respectively, to 98% (p = 0.09) and 94% (p <0.02) when emergency physicians were involved. Similar observations were made in patients with confirmed acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina and remained highly significant after adjustment for differences in clinical characteristics. Thus, community and generalist physicians did not significantly modify their prehospital management of patients with chest pain despite a public campaign. To be successful, guidelines on the matter have to be developed with the active participation of these physicians.

摘要

本研究的目的是分析一场胸痛宣传活动对参与此类症状患者院前护理的医生的影响,具体涉及医生延误、立即住院率和救护车转运率。将活动开展的12个月期间,由社区医生、全科医生或急诊科医生在一家教学医院急诊科处理的所有866例胸痛患者的院前延误和决策,与活动开展前12个月期间所有749例有类似症状患者的情况进行比较。当社区医生和全科医生参与时,活动期间医生的中位延误时间(110分钟)没有减少,而当急诊科医生参与时,中位延误时间从65分钟降至56分钟(p<0.003)。由社区医生和全科医生处理的患者的立即住院率(73%)和救护车转运率(47%)不受活动影响,而当急诊科医生参与时,立即住院率分别从96%和89%升至98%(p = 0.09)和94%(p<0.02)。在确诊为急性心肌梗死和不稳定型心绞痛的患者中也观察到了类似情况,在对临床特征差异进行调整后,这些差异仍然非常显著。因此,尽管开展了一场宣传活动,社区医生和全科医生对胸痛患者的院前管理并没有显著改变。要取得成功,必须在这些医生的积极参与下制定相关指南。

相似文献

1
Do physicians modify their prehospital management of patients in response to a public campaign on chest pain?医生是否会因一场关于胸痛的公众宣传活动而改变他们对患者的院前管理?
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Jun 15;81(12):1433-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00202-1.
2
Impact of a public campaign on pre-hospital delay in patients reporting chest pain.一项公共宣传活动对胸痛患者院前延误的影响。
Heart. 1996 Aug;76(2):150-5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.76.2.150.
3
Effect of a mass media campaign on ambulance use for chest pain.大众媒体宣传活动对胸痛患者使用救护车的影响。
Med J Aust. 2017 Jan 16;206(1):30-35. doi: 10.5694/mja16.00341.
4
Physician Variability in Management of Emergency Department Patients with Chest Pain.急诊科胸痛患者管理中的医生差异
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;18(4):592-600. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.2.32747. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
5
Failure of a chest pain clinical policy to modify physician evaluation and management.
Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Jan;25(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70348-9.
6
Failure of information as an intervention to modify clinical management. A time-series trial in patients with acute chest pain.信息作为改变临床管理的干预措施失败。一项针对急性胸痛患者的时间序列试验。
Ann Intern Med. 1995 Mar 15;122(6):434-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-122-6-199503150-00006.
7
[Suspicion of unstable angina and myocardial infarct. Evaluation and prehospital management by the practitioner].[疑似不稳定型心绞痛和心肌梗死。从业者的评估与院前管理]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 1995 Nov 7;84(45):1289-91.
8
[Chest pain evaluation project].[胸痛评估项目]
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2009 Jan;10(1):46-63.
9
Triage decisions for emergency department patients with chest pain: do physicians' risk attitudes make the difference?急诊科胸痛患者的分诊决策:医生的风险态度会产生影响吗?
J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Oct;10(10):557-64. doi: 10.1007/BF02640365.
10
[Prehospital delay in patients with ischemic chest pain in the Province of Alicante. Multicenter Study of Prehospital Delay in Patients with chest Pain].
Med Clin (Barc). 1996 Jun 15;107(3):81-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Screening and prevention in Swiss primary care: a systematic review.瑞士初级保健中的筛查和预防:系统评价。
Int J Gen Med. 2011;4:853-70. doi: 10.2147/ijgm.s26562. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
2
[Pre-hospital care in acute coronary syndromes. Experience of the ARIAM group].[急性冠脉综合征的院前护理。ARIAM 组的经验]
Aten Primaria. 2001 Apr 30;27(7):478-83. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(01)78838-5.
3
Decision aids for triage of patients with chest pain: a systematic review of field evaluation studies.胸痛患者分诊的决策辅助工具:现场评估研究的系统评价
Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:721-5.
4
Decision aids for triage of patients with chest pain: a systematic review of field evaluation studies.胸痛患者分诊决策辅助工具:对现场评估研究的系统评价
Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:231-5.