Kline D G, Kim D, Midha R, Harsh C, Tiel R
Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans 70112, USA.
J Neurosurg. 1998 Jul;89(1):13-23. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.1.0013.
The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to present results and provide management guidelines for various types of sciatic injuries.
Over a 24-year period, 380 patients with sciatic nerve injuries were managed. In 230 patients (60%), the injury was at the buttock level, with injection injuries comprising more than half of these cases. Thigh-level sciatic injury was evaluated in 150 cases (40%) and was usually secondary to one of four main causes: 1) gunshot wound; 2) femur fracture; 3) laceration; or 4) contusion. Patients with partial deficits uncomplicated by severe pain or with significant spontaneous recovery or late referral were managed medically. Surgical exploration was not indicated in 23% of injuries at the thigh level and almost 50% of those at the buttock level. Most of these patients achieved partial but good spontaneous recovery, especially in the tibial division distribution. Surgical intervention was required for more complete and persistent deficits in either the tibial or peroneal distribution. Divisions of the sciatic nerve were split apart and evaluated independently. Management was guided by nerve action potential (NAP) recordings, which indicated whether neurolysis or resection of the lesion was required. Repair was then made by using sutures or more frequently by graft placement. In most cases in which neurolysis was performed because a positive NAP was recorded distal to the lesion, useful function was found in the peroneal distribution. Unfortunately, significant recovery occurred in only 36% of patients who received suture or graft repairs of the peroneal division. Good-to-excellent outcome was common for the tibial division, even in cases in which repair was proximal and required lengthy grafts. The relatively favorable recovery of tibial as opposed to peroneal divisions of the sciatic nerve occurred regardless of the level or mechanism of injury.
Surgical exploration and, when necessary, repair of sciatic nerve injuries is worthwhile in selected cases.
本回顾性临床研究旨在呈现各类坐骨神经损伤的结果并提供治疗指南。
在24年期间,对380例坐骨神经损伤患者进行了治疗。230例患者(60%)损伤位于臀部水平,其中注射伤占这些病例的一半以上。对150例(40%)大腿水平的坐骨神经损伤进行了评估,其通常继发于以下四种主要原因之一:1)枪伤;2)股骨骨折;3)撕裂伤;或4)挫伤。部分功能缺损且无严重疼痛、有显著自发恢复或延迟就诊的患者接受保守治疗。在大腿水平损伤的患者中,23%以及臀部水平损伤的患者中近50%无需手术探查。这些患者大多实现了部分但良好的自发恢复,尤其是在胫神经分支分布区域。对于胫神经或腓总神经分布区域更完全且持续的功能缺损,则需要手术干预。将坐骨神经的各分支分开并独立评估。治疗以神经动作电位(NAP)记录为指导,其可表明是否需要对病变进行神经松解或切除。然后使用缝线进行修复,或更常见的是通过移植进行修复。在大多数因病变远端记录到阳性NAP而进行神经松解的病例中,腓总神经分布区域发现了有用的功能。不幸的是,接受腓总神经分支缝合或移植修复的患者中,仅有36%实现了显著恢复。即使在修复位于近端且需要长段移植的病例中,胫神经分支的治疗效果通常也为良好至优秀。无论损伤的水平或机制如何,并与坐骨神经的腓总神经分支相比,胫神经分支的恢复情况相对较好。
在某些特定病例中,对坐骨神经损伤进行手术探查并在必要时进行修复是值得的。