• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多柔比星与表柔比星对比:晚期乳腺癌二线随机II/III期研究报告。欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织乳腺癌协作组

Doxorubicin vs epirubicin, report of a second-line randomized phase II/III study in advanced breast cancer. EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.

作者信息

Bontenbal M, Andersson M, Wildiers J, Cocconi G, Jassem J, Paridaens R, Rotmensz N, Sylvester R, Mouridsen H T, Klijn J G, van Oosterom A T

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam Cancer Institute (Dr Daniel den Hoed Kliniek), The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 1998 Jun;77(12):2257-63. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.375.

DOI:10.1038/bjc.1998.375
PMID:9649142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2150384/
Abstract

The EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group carried out a randomized trial to compare doxorubicin with epirubicin as second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Two hundred and fifty-nine patients with at least one site of metastatic disease entered this trial, of whom 232 patients were eligible. Treatment consisted of doxorubicin 75 mg m(-2) or epirubicin 90 mg m(-2) i.v. every 3 weeks. The overall response rates for doxorubicin and epirubicin were 36% and 28% respectively (P = 0.173). The median time to progression was 23 weeks for doxorubicin and 19 weeks for epirubicin (P = 0.063) and the median duration of response was 40 weeks for doxorubicin and 32 weeks for epirubicin (P = 0.059). The median survival was 47 weeks for doxorubicin and 44 weeks for epirubicin (P = 0.196). Leucocyte count on retreatment day (P = 0.011) and platelet nadir (P = 0.031) were significantly lower in the doxorubicin-treated group. Also mucositis (P < 0.001), diarrhoea (P = 0.005) and haemorrhage (P = 0.048) were significantly worse in the doxorubicin arm. Nine patients on doxorubicin and two patients on epirubicin experienced congestive heart failure (CHF). At the dose levels used in this study, no statistical differences in response rate and survival were found between the two treatment arms. Treatment with doxorubicin tended to result in a slightly longer duration of response and time to progression but doxorubicin was more toxic than epirubicin.

摘要

欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织乳腺癌协作组开展了一项随机试验,比较多柔比星与表柔比星作为转移性乳腺癌患者二线化疗药物的疗效。259例至少有一处转移病灶的患者进入该试验,其中232例符合条件。治疗方案为多柔比星75 mg/m²或表柔比星90 mg/m²静脉注射,每3周一次。多柔比星和表柔比星的总体缓解率分别为36%和28%(P = 0.173)。多柔比星组的中位疾病进展时间为23周,表柔比星组为19周(P = 0.063);多柔比星组的中位缓解持续时间为40周,表柔比星组为32周(P = 0.059)。多柔比星组的中位生存期为47周,表柔比星组为44周(P = 0.196)。多柔比星治疗组再次治疗日的白细胞计数(P = 0.011)和血小板最低点(P = 0.031)显著更低。此外,多柔比星组的黏膜炎(P < 0.001)、腹泻(P = 0.005)和出血(P = 0.048)也明显更严重。9例接受多柔比星治疗的患者和2例接受表柔比星治疗的患者发生了充血性心力衰竭(CHF)。在本研究使用的剂量水平下,两个治疗组在缓解率和生存率方面未发现统计学差异。多柔比星治疗往往导致缓解持续时间和疾病进展时间略长,但多柔比星的毒性比表柔比星更大。

相似文献

1
Doxorubicin vs epirubicin, report of a second-line randomized phase II/III study in advanced breast cancer. EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.多柔比星与表柔比星对比:晚期乳腺癌二线随机II/III期研究报告。欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织乳腺癌协作组
Br J Cancer. 1998 Jun;77(12):2257-63. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.375.
2
Use of dexrazoxane as a cardioprotectant in patients receiving doxorubicin or epirubicin chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer. The Provincial Systemic Treatment Disease Site Group.在接受多柔比星或表柔比星化疗治疗癌症的患者中使用右丙亚胺作为心脏保护剂。省级系统治疗疾病部位组。
Cancer Prev Control. 1999 Apr;3(2):145-59.
3
A phase II study of high-dose epirubicin in ovarian cancer patients previously treated with cisplatin. EORTC Gynecological Cancer Cooperative Group.一项针对先前接受顺铂治疗的卵巢癌患者的大剂量表柔比星II期研究。欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织妇科癌症合作组。
Ann Oncol. 2000 Aug;11(8):1035-40. doi: 10.1023/a:1008332517333.
4
A comparative study of doxorubicin and epirubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer.多柔比星与表柔比星治疗转移性乳腺癌患者的对比研究。
Am J Clin Oncol. 1989 Feb;12(1):57-62. doi: 10.1097/00000421-198902000-00014.
5
Epirubicin, alone or in combination chemotherapy, for metastatic breast cancer. Provincial Breast Cancer Disease Site Group and the Provincial Systemic Treatment Disease Site Group.表柔比星单药或联合化疗用于转移性乳腺癌。省级乳腺癌疾病部位组和省级全身治疗疾病部位组。
Cancer Prev Control. 1998 Jun;2(3):140-6.
6
Epirubicin: is it like doxorubicin in breast cancer? A clinical review.表阿霉素:在乳腺癌中是否与多柔比星类似?临床综述。
Breast. 2012 Apr;21(2):142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.12.012. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
7
A prospective randomized comparison of epirubicin and doxorubicin in patients with advanced breast cancer.表柔比星与多柔比星用于晚期乳腺癌患者的前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Clin Oncol. 1985 Jun;3(6):818-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1985.3.6.818.
8
Weekly epirubicin versus doxorubicin as second line therapy in advanced breast cancer. A randomized clinical trial.表柔比星与多柔比星作为晚期乳腺癌二线治疗的对比:一项随机临床试验
Am J Clin Oncol. 1991 Feb;14(1):38-44. doi: 10.1097/00000421-199102000-00009.
9
A randomized comparison of single-agent doxorubicin and epirubicin as first-line cytotoxic therapy in advanced breast cancer.多柔比星单药与表柔比星作为晚期乳腺癌一线细胞毒性治疗的随机对照研究。
J Clin Oncol. 1991 Dec;9(12):2148-52. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.12.2148.
10
Phase III randomized study of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide v fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in advanced breast cancer: an Italian multicentre trial.氟尿嘧啶、表柔比星和环磷酰胺对比氟尿嘧啶、多柔比星和环磷酰胺用于晚期乳腺癌的III期随机研究:一项意大利多中心试验
J Clin Oncol. 1988 Jun;6(6):976-82. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.6.976.

引用本文的文献

1
A randomized, multicenter phase III Study of once-per-cycle administration of efbemalenograstim alfa (F-627), a novel long-acting rhG-CSF, for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with breast cancer.一项随机、多中心 III 期研究,评估了新型长效 rhG-CSF(efbemalenograstim alfa,F-627)在乳腺癌患者中的应用,每周期给药一次,用于预防化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少症。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 13;24(1):1143. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12892-5.
2
A dynamic model of the intestinal epithelium integrates multiple sources of preclinical data and enables clinical translation of drug-induced toxicity.肠道上皮的动态模型整合了多种临床前数据来源,并能够将药物诱导毒性的临床转化。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2023 Oct;12(10):1511-1528. doi: 10.1002/psp4.13029. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
3
A computational study of Anthracyclines interacting with lipid bilayers: Correlation of membrane insertion rates, orientation effects and localisation with cytotoxicity.蒽环类抗生素与脂质双层相互作用的计算研究:与细胞毒性相关的膜插入率、取向效应和定位的相关性。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 15;9(1):2155. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39411-y.
4
Phase II study of adjuvant docetaxel and carboplatin with/without doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in triple negative breast cancer: a randomised controlled clinical trial.多西他赛和卡铂联合或不联合阿霉素及环磷酰胺用于三阴性乳腺癌辅助治疗的II期研究:一项随机对照临床试验
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2017;21(1):83-89. doi: 10.5114/wo.2017.66661. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
5
Systemic treatment approaches in her2-negative advanced breast cancer-guidance on the guidelines.HER2阴性晚期乳腺癌的全身治疗方法——指南解读
Curr Oncol. 2015 Mar;22(Suppl 1):S29-42. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2360.
6
Factors responsible for long-term survival in metastatic breast cancer.转移性乳腺癌长期生存的相关因素。
World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov 14;12:344. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-344.
7
Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (or unknown) advanced breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(或未知)晚期乳腺癌女性的化疗与靶向治疗:美国临床肿瘤学会临床实践指南
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 10;32(29):3307-29. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.7479. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
8
A process for assessing the feasibility of a network meta-analysis: a case study of everolimus in combination with hormonal therapy versus chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer.评估网络荟萃分析可行性的过程:依维莫司联合激素治疗与化疗用于晚期乳腺癌的案例研究
BMC Med. 2014 Jun 5;12:93. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-93.
9
Metronomic chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer to prolong time to treatment failure to 12 months or more.用于转移性乳腺癌的节拍化疗,将治疗失败时间延长至12个月或更长时间。
Mol Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar;1(2):225-230. doi: 10.3892/mco.2012.49. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
10
Which patients with metastatic breast cancer benefit from subsequent lines of treatment? An update for clinicians.哪些转移性乳腺癌患者能从后续治疗中获益?临床医生的最新更新。
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2013 Nov;5(6):334-50. doi: 10.1177/1758834013508197.

本文引用的文献

1
Dose-response relationship of epirubicin in the treatment of postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer: a randomized study of epirubicin at four different dose levels performed by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.表柔比星治疗绝经后转移性乳腺癌患者的剂量反应关系:丹麦乳腺癌协作组进行的四种不同剂量水平表柔比星的随机研究
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Apr;14(4):1146-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.4.1146.
2
Decreased efficacy of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil in metastatic breast cancer when reducing treatment duration from 18 to 6 months.当将转移性乳腺癌的治疗时长从18个月减至6个月时,环磷酰胺、表柔比星和5-氟尿嘧啶的疗效降低。
Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A(4):527-31. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(05)80145-5.
3
Epirubicin and doxorubicin: a comparison of their characteristics, therapeutic activity and toxicity.
Cancer Treat Rev. 1993 Jul;19(3):197-228. doi: 10.1016/0305-7372(93)90036-q.
4
A phase of I trial of 4'-epi-Adriamycin.4'-表阿霉素的I期试验阶段。
Cancer Clin Trials. 1981 Winter;4(4):433-7.
5
Toxic and therapeutic activity of 4'-epi-doxorubicin.4'-表阿霉素的毒性与治疗活性
Tumori. 1982 Apr 30;68(2):105-11. doi: 10.1177/030089168206800202.
6
Randomized phase II trial of carminomycin versus 4'-epidoxorubicin in advanced breast cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 1984 Apr;2(4):275-81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1984.2.4.275.
7
A prospective randomized comparison of epirubicin and doxorubicin in patients with advanced breast cancer.表柔比星与多柔比星用于晚期乳腺癌患者的前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Clin Oncol. 1985 Jun;3(6):818-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1985.3.6.818.
8
Improving the quality of life during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. A comparison of intermittent and continuous treatment strategies.提高晚期乳腺癌化疗期间的生活质量。间歇性与连续性治疗策略的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1987 Dec 10;317(24):1490-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198712103172402.
9
[A prospective randomized trial comparing epirubicin and doxorubicin in advanced or recurrent breast cancer].一项比较表柔比星与多柔比星治疗晚期或复发性乳腺癌的前瞻性随机试验
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1986 Dec;13(12):3498-507.
10
Phase II study of doxorubicin versus epirubicin in advanced breast cancer.
Cancer Treat Rep. 1986 Feb;70(2):261-6.