Maternal cell contamination: a problem in amniocentesis.
作者信息
Mulcahy M T, Jenkyn J
出版信息
Hum Genet. 1976 Sep 10;34(1):115-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00284448.
PMID:965000
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Maternal cell contamination: a problem in amniocentesis.
Hum Genet. 1976 Sep 10;34(1):115-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00284448.
2
Operator experience and sample quality in genetic amniocentesis.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jan;194(1):189-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.033.
3
Prenatal genetics and cytogenetics.
J Iowa Med Soc. 1971 Sep;61(9):546-53.
4
Fear of pregnancy loss and fetal karyotyping: a place for third-trimester amniocentesis?
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2008;23(1):30-5. doi: 10.1159/000109223. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
5
Errors of prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis.
Obstet Gynecol. 1974 Nov;44(5):693-8.
6
[Cytogenic characterization of chromosome markers detected at amniocentesis: implications for karyotype-phenotype correlations].
Minerva Ginecol. 1996 Sep;48(9):365-9.
7
[Evaluation of the third trimester amniocentesis for fetal karyotyping in women with fear of pregnancy loss].
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2008 Jun;37(4):385-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.11.030. Epub 2008 Jan 8.
8
Chromosome analysis of uncultured amniocytes by comparative genomic hybridization in early amniocentesis.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Nov;88 Suppl 3:S1-6.
9
Discordant karyotypes in CVS and amniocenteses using cytogenetic and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses.
Prenat Diagn. 1998 Jan;18(1):87-9.
10
Prospective chromosome analysis of 3429 amniocentesis samples in China using copy number variation sequencing.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;219(3):287.e1-287.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.030. Epub 2018 May 29.
本文引用的文献
1
Prenatal diagnosis: detailed chromosomal analysis in 500 cases.
Clin Genet. 1974;6(4):317-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1974.tb02092.x.
2
Prenatal diagnosis of chromosome disorders.
Br Med Bull. 1976 Jan;32(1):9-15. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071331.
Zotero 插件