Greenberg J, Lifshay J, Van Devanter N, Gonzales V, Celentano D
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
J Womens Health. 1998 Jun;7(5):587-96. doi: 10.1089/jwh.1998.7.587.
Few studies have addressed recruitment and retention of participants in preventive interventions directed at human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and these generally have not focused on women. In this study, part of the Women in Group Support (WINGS) project, we examine the experience of three sites in recruiting 444 high-risk women for a small group intervention to reduce risky sexual behavior. The intervention included six structured sessions, followed by a continuing series of client-focused, drop-in sessions. Incentives for participants included child care, food, and transportation tokens. Attendees at each structured session also received a cash incentive of $10-$20. Forty-six percent of the women were recruited from community sources, 35% from clinics, and 19% from drug programs. Across all recruitment sources, almost a third of the women reported having had a sexually transmitted disease (STD) in the past year, 88%-94% reported a risky male partner (who, they believed, had sex with other partners or with sex workers, was an injecting drug user, or was HIV positive), and 10%-36% reported trading sex for money or drugs. During 18 months of recruitment, each site averaged 34 screening interviews monthly to secure 8 eligible women a month who completed baseline interviews and reported for randomization. The average number of paid sessions attended by participants was five of six (83%). Average attendance at unpaid sessions was 1 of 12 (8%). Key facilitators to recruitment and retention included linkages with community agencies and monetary incentives. Our findings suggest that researchers and community service providers need to explore alternative strategies to paying women for attending group sessions (e.g., incorporating group interventions into existing program requirements) and balance these against the costs and recruitment effectiveness.
很少有研究涉及针对人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的预防性干预措施中参与者的招募和留存问题,而且这些研究通常没有聚焦于女性。在这项作为“小组支持中的女性”(WINGS)项目一部分的研究中,我们考察了三个地点招募444名高危女性参加一项旨在减少危险性性行为的小组干预措施的经历。该干预措施包括六次结构化课程,之后是一系列以服务对象为中心的随时可参加的课程。对参与者的激励措施包括儿童保育、食物和交通代金券。每次结构化课程的参与者还会获得10至20美元的现金奖励。46%的女性是从社区渠道招募的,35%来自诊所,19%来自戒毒项目。在所有招募渠道中,近三分之一的女性报告在过去一年感染过性传播疾病(STD),88%至94%报告有一个高危男性伴侣(她们认为该伴侣与其他伴侣或性工作者发生过性行为、是注射吸毒者或感染了HIV),10%至36%报告曾以性交易换取金钱或毒品。在18个月的招募期间,每个地点平均每月进行34次筛查访谈,以确保每月有8名符合条件的女性完成基线访谈并前来参加随机分组。参与者参加付费课程的平均次数为六次中的五次(83%)。参加无报酬课程的平均出席率为十二次中的一次(8%)。招募和留存的关键促进因素包括与社区机构的联系和金钱激励。我们的研究结果表明,研究人员和社区服务提供者需要探索替代为女性参加小组课程付费的策略(例如,将小组干预纳入现有项目要求),并在成本和招募效果之间进行权衡。