• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

滑铁卢-斯坦福C组量表的经验性评分

Experiential scoring for the Waterloo-Stanford Group C scale.

作者信息

Kirsch I, Milling L S, Burgess C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs 06269-1020, USA.

出版信息

Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1998 Jul;46(3):269-79. doi: 10.1080/00207149808410007.

DOI:10.1080/00207149808410007
PMID:9650439
Abstract

A scale is presented that assesses subjective experiences associated with the test suggestions contained in the Waterloo-Stanford Group C scale (WSGC), a group adaptation of the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale: Form (SHSS:C). This scale, along with the standard behavioral scoring system of the WSGC, was given to 926 students at the University of Connecticut. Normative data from this sample indicate that the experiential scoring scale is both reliable and valid as a measure of suggestibility. It is suggested that it may be useful to supplement behavioral scoring with experiential scoring when the WSGC is used.

摘要

本文介绍了一种量表,该量表用于评估与滑铁卢-斯坦福C组量表(WSGC)中包含的测试建议相关的主观体验,WSGC是斯坦福催眠易感性量表:C版(SHSS:C)的团体改编版。该量表与WSGC的标准行为评分系统一起,被施用于康涅狄格大学的926名学生。来自该样本的常模数据表明,作为一种暗示性测量方法,体验性评分量表既可靠又有效。建议在使用WSGC时,用体验性评分来补充行为评分可能会很有用。

相似文献

1
Experiential scoring for the Waterloo-Stanford Group C scale.滑铁卢-斯坦福C组量表的经验性评分
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1998 Jul;46(3):269-79. doi: 10.1080/00207149808410007.
2
Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form C: manual and response booklet.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1998 Jul;46(3):250-68. doi: 10.1080/00207149808410006.
3
The Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) scale of hypnotic susceptibility: normative and comparative data.滑铁卢-斯坦福C组(WSGC)催眠易感性量表:常模数据与比较数据
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1993 Jan;41(1):35-46. doi: 10.1080/00207149308414536.
4
Subjective scoring for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.哈佛群体催眠易感性量表A式的主观评分
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1990 Apr;38(2):112-24. doi: 10.1080/00207149008414506.
5
Portuguese norms for the Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) scale of hypnotic susceptibility.葡萄牙关于滑铁卢 - 斯坦福C组(WSGC)催眠易感性量表的规范。
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2008 Jul;56(3):295-305. doi: 10.1080/00207140802041850.
6
Belgian norms for the Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility.比利时 Waterloo-Stanford 集团 C 量表(WSGC)催眠易感性的规范。
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2012;60(3):356-69. doi: 10.1080/00207144.2012.675299.
7
A note of caution on the Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of hypnotic susceptibility: a brief communication.关于滑铁卢-斯坦福团体催眠易感性量表的一则警示:简短通讯
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2009 Apr;57(2):222-6. doi: 10.1080/00207140802665484.
8
Italian norms for the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C.斯坦福催眠感受性量表C型的意大利常模。
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2000 Jul;48(3):315-23. doi: 10.1080/00207140008415249.
9
The efficacy of the Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of hypnotic susceptibility: form C.
Am J Clin Hypn. 2002 Jan-Apr;44(3-4):221-30. doi: 10.1080/00029157.2002.10403482.
10
The Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C: normative data of a Dutch student sample.斯坦福催眠易感性量表C型:荷兰学生样本的常模数据。
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2001 Apr;49(2):139-45. doi: 10.1080/00207140108410064.

引用本文的文献

1
Best Practice Recommendations for Conducting and Reporting Controlled Trials in Clinical Hypnosis Research.临床催眠研究中进行和报告对照试验的最佳实践推荐。
J Evid Based Integr Med. 2024 Jan-Dec;29:2515690X241274538. doi: 10.1177/2515690X241274538.
2
Can hypnotic suggestibility be measured online?催眠易感性能否在线测量?
Psychol Res. 2020 Jul;84(5):1460-1471. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01162-w. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
3
The Sussex-Waterloo Scale of Hypnotizability (SWASH): measuring capacity for altering conscious experience.
苏塞克斯-滑铁卢催眠易感性量表(SWASH):测量改变意识体验的能力。
Neurosci Conscious. 2018 Jun 3;2018(1):niy006. doi: 10.1093/nc/niy006. eCollection 2018.