Saugstad O D, Rootwelt T, Aalen O
Department of Pediatric Research, National Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Pediatrics. 1998 Jul;102(1):e1. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.1.e1.
Birth asphyxia represents a serious problem worldwide, resulting in approximately 1 million deaths and an equal number of serious sequelae annually. It is therefore important to develop new and better ways to treat asphyxia. Resuscitation after birth asphyxia traditionally has been carried out with 100% oxygen, and most guidelines and textbooks recommend this; however, the scientific background for this has never been established. On the contrary, theoretic considerations indicate that resuscitation with high oxygen concentrations could have detrimental effects. We have performed a series of animal studies as well as one pilot study indicating that resuscitation can be performed with room air just as efficiently as with 100% oxygen. To test this more thoroughly, we organized a multicenter study and hypothesized that room air is superior to 100% oxygen when asphyxiated newborn infants are resuscitated.
In a prospective, international, controlled multicenter study including 11 centers from six countries, asphyxiated newborn infants with birth weight >999 g were allocated to resuscitation with either room air or 100% oxygen. The study was not blinded, and the patients were allocated to one of the two treatment groups according to date of birth. Those born on even dates were resuscitated with room air and those born on odd dates with 100% oxygen. Informed consent was not obtained until after the initial resuscitation, an arrangement in agreement with the new proposal of the US Food and Drug Administration's rules governing investigational drugs and medical devices to permit clinical research on emergency care without the consent of subjects. The protocol was approved by the ethical committees at each participating center. Entry criterion was apnea or gasping with heart rate <80 beats per minute at birth necessitating resuscitation. Exclusion criteria were birth weight <1000 g, lethal anomalies, hydrops, cyanotic congenital heart defects, and stillbirths. Primary outcome measures were death within 1 week and/or presence of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, grade II or III, according to a modification of Sarnat and Sarnat. Secondary outcome measures were Apgar score at 5 minutes, heart rate at 90 seconds, time to first breath, time to first cry, duration of resuscitation, arterial blood gases and acid base status at 10 and 30 minutes of age, and abnormal neurologic examination at 4 weeks. The existing routines for resuscitation in each participating unit were followed, and the ventilation techniques described by the American Heart Association were used as guidelines aiming at a frequency of manual ventilation of 40 to 60 breaths per minute.
Forms for 703 enrolled infants from 11 centers were received by the steering committee. All 94 patients from one of the centers were excluded because of violation of the inclusion criteria in 86 of these. Therefore, the final number of infants enrolled in the study was 609 (from 10 centers), with 288 in the room air group and 321 in the oxygen group. Median (5 to 95 percentile) gestational ages were 38 (32.0 to 42.0) and 38 (31.1 to 41.5) weeks (NS), and birth weights were 2600 (1320 to 4078) g and 2560 (1303 to 3900) g (NS) in the room air and oxygen groups, respectively. There were 46% girls in the room air and 41% in the oxygen group (NS). Mortality in the first 7 days of life was 12.2% and 15.0% in the room air and oxygen groups, respectively; adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.82 with 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 0.50-1.35. Neonatal mortality was 13.9% and 19.0%; adjusted OR = 0. 72 with 95% CI = 0.45-1.15. Death within 7 days of life and/or moderate or severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (primary outcome measure) was seen in 21.2% in the room air group and in 23.7% in the oxygen group; OR = 0.94 with 95% CI = 0.63-1.40. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
出生窒息是一个全球性的严重问题,每年导致约100万人死亡以及同样数量的严重后遗症。因此,开发新的更好的窒息治疗方法很重要。传统上,出生窒息后的复苏使用100%氧气进行,大多数指南和教科书也推荐这样做;然而,其科学依据从未得到确立。相反,理论上的考虑表明,高氧浓度复苏可能产生有害影响。我们进行了一系列动物研究以及一项初步研究,结果表明使用室内空气进行复苏与使用100%氧气一样有效。为了更全面地验证这一点,我们组织了一项多中心研究,并假设在对窒息新生儿进行复苏时,室内空气优于100%氧气。
在一项前瞻性、国际性、对照多中心研究中,来自六个国家的11个中心参与其中,将出生体重>999 g的窒息新生儿分配至使用室内空气或100%氧气进行复苏。该研究未设盲,根据出生日期将患者分配至两个治疗组之一。偶数日期出生的婴儿用室内空气进行复苏,奇数日期出生的婴儿用100%氧气进行复苏。直到初始复苏后才获得知情同意,这一安排符合美国食品药品监督管理局关于研究性药物和医疗器械的新规定提案,允许在未经受试者同意的情况下进行急诊护理的临床研究。该方案得到了每个参与中心伦理委员会的批准。纳入标准为出生时呼吸暂停或喘息且心率<80次/分钟,需要进行复苏。排除标准为出生体重<1000 g、致命畸形、水肿、青紫型先天性心脏病和死产。主要结局指标为1周内死亡和/或根据对萨纳特和萨纳特标准的修改判定为II级或III级的缺氧缺血性脑病。次要结局指标为5分钟时的阿氏评分、90秒时的心率、首次呼吸时间、首次啼哭时间、复苏持续时间、10分钟和30分钟时的动脉血气和酸碱状态以及4周时的神经系统检查异常。遵循每个参与单位现有的复苏常规,并以美国心脏协会描述的通气技术为指导,目标是手动通气频率为每分钟40至60次呼吸。
指导委员会收到了来自11个中心的703名登记婴儿的表格。其中一个中心的94名患者全部被排除,因为其中86名不符合纳入标准。因此,该研究最终纳入的婴儿数量为609名(来自10个中心),室内空气组288名,氧气组321名。室内空气组和氧气组的中位(第5至95百分位数)胎龄分别为38(32.0至42.0)周和38(31.1至41.5)周(无显著性差异),出生体重分别为2600(1320至4078)g和2560(1303至3900)g(无显著性差异)。室内空气组女孩占46%,氧气组占41%(无显著性差异)。出生后前7天的死亡率在室内空气组和氧气组分别为12.2%和15.0%;调整后的比值比(OR)=0.82,95%置信区间(CI)=0.50 - 1.35。新生儿死亡率分别为13.9%和19.0%;调整后的OR = 0.72,95%CI = 0.45 - 1.15。出生后7天内死亡和/或中度或重度缺氧缺血性脑病(主要结局指标)在室内空气组为21.2%,在氧气组为23.7%;OR = 0.94,95%CI = 0.63 - 1.40。(摘要截断)