• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患有静脉淤滞性溃疡的患者单核细胞与血小板的聚集增加。

Patients with venous stasis ulceration have increased monocyte-platelet aggregation.

作者信息

Peyton B D, Rohrer M J, Furman M I, Barnard M R, Rodino L J, Benoit S E, Hechtman H B, Valeri C R, Michelson A D

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Center for Platelet Function Studies, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester 01655, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 1998 Jun;27(6):1109-15; discussion 1115-6. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70013-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70013-8
PMID:9652473
Abstract

PURPOSE

Leukocyte activation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of venous stasis ulceration, but the involvement of activated platelets and leukocyte-platelet aggregates has not been previously investigated. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients with venous stasis ulceration have increased platelet activation and a propensity toward formation of leukocyte-platelet aggregates.

METHODS

Blood was drawn from the superficial veins of the leg just proximal to a venous stasis ulcer and from an antecubital vein in 14 patients with venous stasis ulceration. Blood was also drawn from the antecubital vein of 14 volunteers without evidence of venous disease. Whole-blood flow cytometry was used to analyze the samples before and after activation with a panel of agonists for evidence of platelet activation and the formation of leukocyte-platelet aggregates.

RESULTS

Patients with venous stasis ulceration had a greater number of monocyte-platelet aggregates in both the arm and leg samples than did the control subjects (p < 0.01). Furthermore, antecubital blood samples from patients with venous stasis ulceration stimulated with either thrombin-receptor agonist peptide, adenosine diphosphate, or phorbol myristate acetate formed more monocyte-platelet aggregates than did control samples (p < 0.05). No differences in platelet activation or neutrophil-platelet aggregate formation were noted among the three sample groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with venous stasis ulceration have an increase in the number of monocyte-platelet aggregates in systemic venous blood as well as in venous blood adjacent to a venous stasis ulcer, implicating the monocyte as the leukocyte involved in the pathogenesis of venous stasis ulceration. No association was identified between the presence of a venous stasis ulcer and either neutrophil-platelet aggregation or the activation of individual platelets. Because platelet activation is necessary for the formation of monocyte-platelet aggregates, these data also suggest that monocyte-platelet aggregation is a more sensitive marker for in vivo platelet activation than is the identification of individual activated platelets.

摘要

目的

白细胞活化与静脉淤滞性溃疡的发病机制有关,但活化血小板及白细胞 - 血小板聚集体的参与情况此前尚未得到研究。本研究的目的是确定静脉淤滞性溃疡患者是否存在血小板活化增加以及白细胞 - 血小板聚集体形成倾向。

方法

从14例静脉淤滞性溃疡患者腿部静脉淤滞性溃疡近端的浅静脉及肘静脉采血。还从14名无静脉疾病证据的志愿者的肘静脉采血。使用全血流式细胞术分析样本在用一组激动剂激活前后,以检测血小板活化及白细胞 - 血小板聚集体形成的证据。

结果

静脉淤滞性溃疡患者手臂和腿部样本中的单核细胞 - 血小板聚集体数量均多于对照组(p < 0.01)。此外,用凝血酶受体激动肽、二磷酸腺苷或佛波醇肉豆蔻酸酯刺激的静脉淤滞性溃疡患者的肘静脉血样本比对照样本形成更多的单核细胞 - 血小板聚集体(p < 0.05)。三个样本组之间在血小板活化或中性粒细胞 - 血小板聚集体形成方面未发现差异。

结论

静脉淤滞性溃疡患者全身静脉血以及静脉淤滞性溃疡附近静脉血中的单核细胞 - 血小板聚集体数量增加,这表明单核细胞是参与静脉淤滞性溃疡发病机制的白细胞。未发现静脉淤滞性溃疡的存在与中性粒细胞 - 血小板聚集或单个血小板活化之间存在关联。由于血小板活化是单核细胞 - 血小板聚集体形成所必需的,这些数据还表明,单核细胞 - 血小板聚集比单个活化血小板的识别是体内血小板活化更敏感的标志物。

相似文献

1
Patients with venous stasis ulceration have increased monocyte-platelet aggregation.患有静脉淤滞性溃疡的患者单核细胞与血小板的聚集增加。
J Vasc Surg. 1998 Jun;27(6):1109-15; discussion 1115-6. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70013-8.
2
Chronic venous insufficiency is associated with increased platelet and monocyte activation and aggregation.慢性静脉功能不全与血小板及单核细胞的激活和聚集增加有关。
J Vasc Surg. 1999 Nov;30(5):844-51. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70009-1.
3
Platelet-monocyte aggregates in patients with chronic venous insufficiency remain elevated following correction of reflux.慢性静脉功能不全患者经反流纠正后,血小板 - 单核细胞聚集体仍保持升高状态。
Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Oct;10(5):464-9.
4
Increased platelet reactivity and circulating monocyte-platelet aggregates in patients with stable coronary artery disease.稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者血小板反应性增加及循环单核细胞-血小板聚集体增多。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Feb;31(2):352-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00510-x.
5
The differential formation and composition of leukocyte-platelet aggregates induced by various cellular stimulants.不同细胞刺激物诱导的白细胞-血小板聚集体的形成和组成差异。
Thromb Res. 2024 Sep;241:109092. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2024.109092. Epub 2024 Jul 7.
6
Increased circulating platelet-leukocyte aggregates in myeloproliferative disorders is correlated to previous thrombosis, platelet activation and platelet count.骨髓增殖性疾病中循环血小板 - 白细胞聚集体增加与既往血栓形成、血小板活化及血小板计数相关。
Eur J Haematol. 2001 Mar;66(3):143-51. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2001.00359.x.
7
Clopidogrel but not aspirin reduces P-selectin expression and formation of platelet-leukocyte aggregates in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease.在动脉粥样硬化性血管疾病患者中,氯吡格雷而非阿司匹林可降低P-选择素的表达并减少血小板-白细胞聚集体的形成。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Mar;73(3):232-41. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2003.13.
8
Adenosine inhibition of adenosine diphosphate and thrombin-induced monocyte-platelet aggregates in cardiac syndrome X.腺苷对心脏X综合征中腺苷二磷酸和凝血酶诱导的单核细胞-血小板聚集体的抑制作用
Thromb Res. 2009 May;124(1):116-20. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2008.12.041. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
9
Leukocyte activity in the microcirculation of the leg in patients with chronic venous disease.慢性静脉疾病患者腿部微循环中的白细胞活性
J Vasc Surg. 1997 Aug;26(2):265-73. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(97)70188-5.
10
Detection of activated platelets and platelet-leukocyte aggregates in horses.马体内活化血小板和血小板-白细胞聚集体的检测。
Am J Vet Res. 1997 Aug;58(8):823-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Immunological aspects of chronic venous disease pathogenesis.慢性静脉疾病发病机制的免疫学方面
Cent Eur J Immunol. 2014;39(4):525-31. doi: 10.5114/ceji.2014.47740. Epub 2014 Dec 15.