Gonzalo J A, Lloyd C M, Wen D, Albar J P, Wells T N, Proudfoot A, Martinez-A C, Dorf M, Bjerke T, Coyle A J, Gutierrez-Ramos J C
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
J Exp Med. 1998 Jul 6;188(1):157-67. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.1.157.
The complex pathophysiology of lung allergic inflammation and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) that characterize asthma is achieved by the regulated accumulation and activation of different leukocyte subsets in the lung. The development and maintenance of these processes correlate with the coordinated production of chemokines. Here, we have assessed the role that different chemokines play in lung allergic inflammation and BHR by blocking their activities in vivo. Our results show that blockage of each one of these chemokines reduces both lung leukocyte infiltration and BHR in a substantially different way. Thus, eotaxin neutralization reduces specifically BHR and lung eosinophilia transiently after each antigen exposure. Monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-5 neutralization abolishes BHR not by affecting the accumulation of inflammatory leukocytes in the airways, but rather by altering the trafficking of the eosinophils and other leukocytes through the lung interstitium. Neutralization of RANTES (regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted) receptor(s) with a receptor antagonist decreases significantly lymphocyte and eosinophil infiltration as well as mRNA expression of eotaxin and RANTES. In contrast, neutralization of one of the ligands for RANTES receptors, macrophage-inflammatory protein 1alpha, reduces only slightly lung eosinophilia and BHR. Finally, MCP-1 neutralization diminishes drastically BHR and inflammation, and this correlates with a pronounced decrease in monocyte- and lymphocyte-derived inflammatory mediators. These results suggest that different chemokines activate different cellular and molecular pathways that in a coordinated fashion contribute to the complex pathophysiology of asthma, and that their individual blockage results in intervention at different levels of these processes.
哮喘所特有的肺部过敏性炎症和支气管高反应性(BHR)的复杂病理生理学是通过肺中不同白细胞亚群的调节性聚集和激活来实现的。这些过程的发展和维持与趋化因子的协同产生相关。在这里,我们通过在体内阻断不同趋化因子的活性,评估了它们在肺部过敏性炎症和BHR中所起的作用。我们的结果表明,阻断这些趋化因子中的每一种都会以截然不同的方式减少肺部白细胞浸润和BHR。因此,嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子中和作用在每次抗原暴露后会特异性地短暂降低BHR和肺部嗜酸性粒细胞增多。单核细胞趋化蛋白(MCP)-5中和作用并非通过影响气道中炎性白细胞的聚集来消除BHR,而是通过改变嗜酸性粒细胞和其他白细胞在肺间质中的运输来实现。用受体拮抗剂中和调节激活正常T细胞表达和分泌的因子(RANTES)受体,可显著降低淋巴细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞浸润以及嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子和RANTES的mRNA表达。相比之下,中和RANTES受体的一种配体巨噬细胞炎性蛋白1α仅略微降低肺部嗜酸性粒细胞增多和BHR。最后,MCP-1中和作用可大幅降低BHR和炎症,这与单核细胞和淋巴细胞衍生的炎性介质显著减少相关。这些结果表明,不同的趋化因子激活不同的细胞和分子途径,这些途径以协调的方式促成哮喘的复杂病理生理学,并且对它们的单独阻断会导致在这些过程的不同水平上进行干预。