Meerlo P, Daan S
Department of Animal Physiology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Chronobiol Int. 1998 May;15(3):231-40. doi: 10.3109/07420529808998686.
The objective of the present study was to determine whether the rat circadian system is sensitive to social stimuli. Male rats were subjected to a sociosexual interaction with an estrous female or to an aggressive interaction with a dominant male conspecific. The interactions lasted for 1 h and took place in the middle of the circadian resting phase. Control animals were picked up and handled for a few minutes, but were otherwise left undisturbed. Animals were housed under constant dim red light during the whole period of the experiment. To assess the effects of the interactions on free-running circadian rhythmicity, body temperature was measured by means of radio telemetry. neither the sociosexual interaction with a female nor the aggressive interaction with another male induced phase shifts or changes in the free-running period. The rat circadian system does not seem to be sensitive to social stimuli directly. Moreover, the finding that aggressive interactions do not phase shift circadian rhythms indicates that the endogenous pacemaker in rats is not sensitive to stressors.
本研究的目的是确定大鼠的昼夜节律系统是否对社会刺激敏感。雄性大鼠与处于发情期的雌性大鼠进行社会性互动,或与占主导地位的同种雄性大鼠进行攻击性互动。互动持续1小时,发生在昼夜休息阶段的中间。对照动物被抓起并处理几分钟,但除此之外不受干扰。在整个实验期间,动物饲养在持续昏暗的红光下。为了评估互动对自由运行的昼夜节律的影响,通过无线电遥测法测量体温。与雌性的社会性互动和与另一只雄性的攻击性互动均未引起相位偏移或自由运行周期的变化。大鼠的昼夜节律系统似乎对社会刺激不直接敏感。此外,攻击性互动不会使昼夜节律发生相位偏移这一发现表明,大鼠体内的内源性起搏器对应激源不敏感。