Differential effects of load stiffness on matching pinch force, finger span, and effort.

Disparities in load stiffness were used to differentiate and characterize pinch-force, finger-span, and pinch-effort matching in two experiments. All subjects squeezed a spring-loaded manipulandum in each hand using three-finger pinch. Subjects in the first experiment were instructed explicitly to match one of the three continua. Subjects matching force or span were told to attend carefully to sensations from the hand or arm and to ignore differences in the effort required to make the sensations equal. They had to achieve and hold a particular target force with the reference hand and then match force or span with the opposite hand, usually against a spring with a different stiffness. These subjects were given as much time as necessary to make their matches and were told which hand was serving as the reference in each trial. Effort-matching subjects were told to ignore peripheral sensations and to match effort or motor commands. These subjects were not told which hand was the reference and were given only 1 s to make a match, so they made matches by rapidly squeezing both manipulanda simultaneously and, presumably, with the same voluntary motor command. The matching behaviors of the three groups were clearly distinguishable and were consistent with instructions. Results were similar whether different subjects were assigned different instructions or the same subjects performed all three match types. In a second experiment, naïve subjects were given purposely ambiguous instructions without reference to a specific continuum and had no time or accuracy constraints. Subjects produced the same three sensorimotor behaviors obtained with explicit instructions, showing that the different behaviors were not artifacts of strict protocols. Taken together, the results show that force, span, and effort are distinct sensorimotor continua that can be judged reliably.