Van Doren C L
Department of Orthopedics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Motor Control. 1998 Oct;2(4):352-78. doi: 10.1123/mcj.2.4.352.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether direct measurements of grasp stiffness agreed with stiffness inferred from the slopes of isovolitional force-space characteristics derived from previous grasp-effort matching data. Grasp stiffness for three-finger pinch was measured as a function of initial force and finger span using step displacements applied in a do-not-intervene paradigm. Subjects pinched a free-floating, motorized manipulandum in each hand and squeezed both with equal effort; one of the hands was perturbed at random. Stiffness was calculated from the initial and final steady-state values of force and span. The effects of step amplitude, rise-time, and initial load stiffness were investigated; grasp stiffness decreased significantly for larger steps, increased slightly for longer rise-times, and was unaffected by load stiffness. Grasp stiffness then was measured as a function of initial force and span using a single set of step parameters. Stiffness increased significantly in proportion to force but was changed only slightly by span. It was concluded that the perturbation and effort-matching measures of stiffness are not equivalent and represent different components of motor behavior.
本研究的目的是确定直接测量的抓握刚度是否与从先前抓握-努力匹配数据得出的等意志力-空间特性斜率推断出的刚度一致。使用在不干预范式中施加的阶跃位移,将三指捏的抓握刚度测量为初始力和手指跨度的函数。受试者用每只手捏住一个自由浮动的电动操作器,并以相同的努力挤压两者;其中一只手被随机扰动。刚度根据力和跨度的初始和最终稳态值计算得出。研究了阶跃幅度、上升时间和初始负载刚度的影响;对于较大的阶跃,抓握刚度显著降低,对于较长的上升时间,抓握刚度略有增加,并且抓握刚度不受负载刚度的影响。然后使用一组单一的阶跃参数将抓握刚度测量为初始力和跨度的函数。刚度与力成比例地显著增加,但跨度对其影响很小。得出的结论是,刚度的扰动测量和努力匹配测量并不等效,并且代表了运动行为的不同组成部分。