• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对北安普敦郡家庭住宅中氡气减排的成本效益评估。

A review of the cost effectiveness of radon mitigation in domestic properties in Northamptonshire.

作者信息

Denman A R, Phillips P S

机构信息

Medical Physics Department, Northampton General Hospital, Cliftonville, UK.

出版信息

J Radiol Prot. 1998 Jun;18(2):119-24. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/18/2/007.

DOI:10.1088/0952-4746/18/2/007
PMID:9656192
Abstract

The costs of remedial work, and the radon level reduction achieved, have been studied in a series of domestic properties in Northamptonshire, which is a radon affected area. The cost-effectiveness of the series is similar to published theoretical estimates for proposed national remediation programmes, and five times more effective than our similar analysis for the National Health Service workplace, if it is assumed that 100% of householders discovering levels above 300 Bq m-3 implement remediation. In practice, in the UK, far fewer of those who arrange an initial radon test proceed to remediation, but this domestic programme could be cost effective if more than 5% carry out remediation. Our series confirms that a considerable number of householders with radon levels in the 200 to 300 Bq m-3 range do not seek or implement remediation work.

摘要

在北安普敦郡(一个受氡影响的地区)的一系列住宅中,研究了补救工作的成本以及实现的氡水平降低情况。如果假设发现氡水平高于300贝克勒尔/立方米的住户中有100%进行补救,那么该系列的成本效益与已公布的拟议国家补救计划的理论估计相似,并且比我们对国民保健服务机构工作场所的类似分析有效五倍。实际上,在英国,安排初始氡测试的人中进行补救的要少得多,但如果超过5%的人进行补救,这个家庭计划可能具有成本效益。我们的系列研究证实,相当数量的氡水平在200至300贝克勒尔/立方米范围内的住户不会寻求或进行补救工作。

相似文献

1
A review of the cost effectiveness of radon mitigation in domestic properties in Northamptonshire.对北安普敦郡家庭住宅中氡气减排的成本效益评估。
J Radiol Prot. 1998 Jun;18(2):119-24. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/18/2/007.
2
The cost-effectiveness of radon mitigation in schools in Northamptonshire.北安普敦郡学校氡减排的成本效益
J Radiol Prot. 1998 Sep;18(3):203-8. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/18/3/007.
3
A critical comparison of the cost-effectiveness of domestic radon remediation programmes in three counties of England.对英格兰三个郡家庭氡治理项目成本效益的关键比较。
J Environ Radioact. 2002;62(2):129-44. doi: 10.1016/s0265-931x(01)00156-4.
4
The costs of radon mitigation in domestic properties.住宅物业中氡减排的成本。
Health Policy. 2001 Aug;57(2):97-109. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00146-9.
5
A new methodology for cost-effectiveness studies of domestic radon remediation programmes: quality-adjusted life-years gained within primary care trusts in central England.一种用于国内氡气治理项目成本效益研究的新方法:英格兰中部初级保健信托机构获得的质量调整生命年数。
Sci Total Environ. 2006 Jul 31;366(1):32-46. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.12.020. Epub 2006 Mar 30.
6
The cost effectiveness of radon remediation programmes in hospitals, schools and homes in radon affected areas in the UK.英国氡污染影响地区医院、学校和家庭中氡治理项目的成本效益。
Sci Total Environ. 2001 May 14;272(1-3):23-4. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(01)00660-x.
7
The rate of radon remediation in Ireland 2011-2015: Establishing a base line rate for Ireland's National Radon Control Strategy.2011 - 2015年爱尔兰氡治理率:为爱尔兰国家氡控制战略确定基线率。
J Environ Radioact. 2016 Oct;162-163:107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 23.
8
Lung-cancer reduction from smoking cessation and radon remediation: a preliminary cost-analysis in Northamptonshire, UK.戒烟和氡气治理对降低肺癌发病率的作用:英国北安普敦郡的初步成本分析。
Environ Int. 2011 Feb;37(2):375-82. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2010.10.010. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
9
Evaluating the health benefits and cost-effectiveness of the radon remediation programme in domestic properties in Northamptonshire, UK.评估英国北安普敦郡家庭房产中氡气治理项目的健康效益和成本效益。
Health Policy. 2005 Aug;73(2):139-50. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.11.005. Epub 2004 Dec 8.
10
Evaluation and equity audit of the domestic radon programme in England.英格兰国内氡计划的评估和公平性审计。
Health Policy. 2011 Sep;102(1):81-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.09.016. Epub 2010 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence for public health policy on inequalities: 2: assembling the evidence jigsaw.关于不平等问题的公共卫生政策证据:2:拼凑证据拼图。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Oct;58(10):817-21. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.015297.
2
A cost-effectiveness analysis of a residential radon remediation programme in the United Kingdom.英国住宅氡气治理计划的成本效益分析。
Br J Cancer. 1999 Dec;81(7):1243-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690836.
3
Reducing radon levels. Responsibility should be with local authority.降低氡气水平。责任应由地方当局承担。
BMJ. 1998 Nov 21;317(7170):1455.