• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[化疗CHOP方案与CHOP/VIA方案治疗侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的比较:132例患者的随机多中心研究。PETHEMA组。恶性血液病研究与治疗项目。西班牙血液学与血液治疗协会]

[Comparison of chemotherapy CHOP vs. CHOP/VIA in the treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a randomized multicenter study of 132 patients. The PETHEMA group. Program for Study and Therapeutics of malignant hemopathies. Spanish Association of Hematology and Hemotherapy].

作者信息

López-Guillermo A, García-Conde J, Alvarez-Carmona A M, León P, Maldonado J, Alcalá A, Zubizarreta A, Sancho-Tello R, Carbonell F, Contreras E, Besses C, Hernando A, Fontanillas M, Montserrat E

机构信息

Servicio de Hematología, Hospital Clínic i Provincial, Villarroel, Barcelona.

出版信息

Med Clin (Barc). 1998 May 9;110(16):601-4.

PMID:9656196
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare standard chemotherapy CHOP (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine and prednisone) with the regimen CHOP/VIA (VP-16, iphosphamide and cytarabine) in terms of response to therapy, response duration, survival and toxicity in patients with aggressive lymphoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

132 patients (84 males and 48 females; median age, 55 years) were included from 12 Spanish Institutions, diagnosed of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of intermediate or high grade, in stages II-IV and previously untreated. Patients were randomized to receive CHOP or CHOP/VIA.

RESULTS

After excluding 14 not assessable cases, 62 patients (52.5%) received CHOP, and 56 (47.5%) CHOP/VIA. No significant differences were found on main prognostic factors between such groups. Response was assessable in 114 cases (CHOP: 61; CHOP/VIA: 53) 39 patients (64%) receiving CHOP achieved complete response (CR), and 2 (3%) partial response (PR), whereas in the CHOP/VIA group CR and PR rates were 63% (34/53), and 7% (4/53), respectively. 14 patients (36%) treated with CHOP and 12 (35%) treated with CHOP/VIA eventually relapsed, with an actuarial risk of relapse at 36 months of 43% and 40%, respectively. Median survival was 37 months. No differences were found between both therapeutic groups, with an overall survival at 36 months from diagnosis of 53.5% (CI 95%: 40-67) for CHOP and 48% (CI 95%: 34-62) for CHOP/VIA. Finally, toxicity was not different for both arms.

CONCLUSION

In the present study in patients with aggressive NHL chemotherapy regimens CHOP and CHOP/VIA showed similar results in terms of response, response duration, survival and toxicity.

摘要

背景

比较标准化疗方案CHOP(环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松)与CHOP/VIA方案(依托泊苷、异环磷酰胺和阿糖胞苷)在侵袭性淋巴瘤患者中的治疗反应、反应持续时间、生存率和毒性。

患者与方法

来自12家西班牙机构的132例患者(84例男性,48例女性;中位年龄55岁)被纳入研究,这些患者被诊断为II-IV期中级或高级非霍奇金淋巴瘤,且此前未接受过治疗。患者被随机分配接受CHOP或CHOP/VIA方案治疗。

结果

排除14例不可评估病例后,62例患者(52.5%)接受CHOP方案治疗,56例(47.5%)接受CHOP/VIA方案治疗。两组之间的主要预后因素无显著差异。114例患者(CHOP组61例,CHOP/VIA组53例)的治疗反应可评估,接受CHOP方案治疗的39例患者(64%)达到完全缓解(CR),2例(3%)达到部分缓解(PR),而在CHOP/VIA组中,CR和PR率分别为63%(34/53)和7%(4/53)。接受CHOP方案治疗的14例患者(36%)和接受CHOP/VIA方案治疗的12例患者(35%)最终复发,36个月时的复发精算风险分别为43%和40%。中位生存期为37个月。两个治疗组之间未发现差异,CHOP组从诊断开始36个月时的总生存率为53.5%(95%CI:40-67),CHOP/VIA组为48%(95%CI:34-62)。最后,两组的毒性无差异。

结论

在本研究中,对于侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者,化疗方案CHOP和CHOP/VIA在治疗反应、反应持续时间、生存率和毒性方面显示出相似的结果。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of chemotherapy CHOP vs. CHOP/VIA in the treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a randomized multicenter study of 132 patients. The PETHEMA group. Program for Study and Therapeutics of malignant hemopathies. Spanish Association of Hematology and Hemotherapy].[化疗CHOP方案与CHOP/VIA方案治疗侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的比较:132例患者的随机多中心研究。PETHEMA组。恶性血液病研究与治疗项目。西班牙血液学与血液治疗协会]
Med Clin (Barc). 1998 May 9;110(16):601-4.
2
Treatment of relapsed aggressive lymphomas: regimens with and without high-dose therapy and stem cell rescue.复发侵袭性淋巴瘤的治疗:含与不含高剂量治疗及干细胞救援的方案
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2002 May;49 Suppl 1:S13-20. doi: 10.1007/s00280-002-0447-1. Epub 2002 Apr 12.
3
[Treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with the ProMACE- CytaBOM protocol].采用ProMACE-CytaBOM方案治疗侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1998 Sep-Oct;126(9-10):345-8.
4
Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.标准方案(CHOP)与三种强化化疗方案治疗晚期非霍奇金淋巴瘤的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 8;328(14):1002-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304083281404.
5
[Comparing CHOP, CHOP+HD-MTX,and BFM-90 regimens in the survival rate of children and adolescents with B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma].[比较CHOP、CHOP+HD-MTX和BFM-90方案对儿童和青少年B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤生存率的影响]
Ai Zheng. 2004 Aug;23(8):933-8.
6
Effects of Mega-COMLA (cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, vincristine, and methotrexate followed by leucovorin and prednisone) plus CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) in the treatment of lymphoid neoplasms with very poor prognosis.大剂量COMLA(环磷酰胺、阿糖胞苷、长春新碱和甲氨蝶呤,随后使用亚叶酸钙和泼尼松)联合CHOP(环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松)治疗预后极差的淋巴瘤的疗效
Cancer Treat Rep. 1986 Aug;70(8):953-8.
7
Impact of three courses of intensified CHOP prior to high-dose sequential therapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation as first-line treatment in poor-risk, aggressive non-hodgkin's lymphoma: comparative analysis of Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group Studies 27 and 40.在高危侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤一线治疗中,大剂量序贯疗法联合自体干细胞移植前进行三个疗程强化CHOP方案的影响:荷兰-比利时血液肿瘤协作组研究27和40的对比分析
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 1;23(16):3793-801. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.039. Epub 2005 Apr 4.
8
Prolonged clinical and molecular remission in patients with low-grade or follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy: 9-year follow-up.利妥昔单抗联合CHOP化疗治疗低度或滤泡性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的长期临床和分子缓解:9年随访
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Dec 1;22(23):4711-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.020. Epub 2004 Oct 13.
9
Phase II trial of CHOP plus rituximab in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.CHOP联合利妥昔单抗治疗HIV相关非霍奇金淋巴瘤的II期试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Sep 1;24(25):4123-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.4684. Epub 2006 Aug 8.
10
Combined chemotherapy with carmustine, doxorubicin, etoposide, vincristine, and cyclophosphamide plus mitoxantrone, cytarabine and methotrexate with citrovorum factor for the treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a long-term follow-up study.卡莫司汀、多柔比星、依托泊苷、长春新碱和环磷酰胺联合米托蒽醌、阿糖胞苷及甲氨蝶呤加亚叶酸钙治疗侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的长期随访研究
Cancer. 2005 Mar 1;103(5):970-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20891.