Kuttila M, Niemi P M, Kuttila S, Alanen P, Le Bell Y
Department of Psychiatry, University of Turku, Finland.
J Orofac Pain. 1998 Winter;12(1):67-74.
Associations between treatment need for temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and age, gender, stress, and diagnostic subgroup were analyzed in an adult Finnish population sample of 506 subjects. When analyzed separately, the association between TMD treatment need and all the studied factors was statistically significant. This finding is in accordance with earlier results. When the studied factors were included into an explanatory model, however, the picture changed. The logistic regression analysis revealed that diagnostic subgroup was the strongest predictor for the TMD treatment need. Total stress score significantly added to the explanatory power of the model, but age and gender did not. The commonplace observation that women show more signs and symptoms of TMD seems to be explainable by their higher stress scores and by the type of symptoms.
在芬兰的一个506名成年人的样本中,分析了颞下颌关节紊乱症(TMD)的治疗需求与年龄、性别、压力和诊断亚组之间的关联。单独分析时,TMD治疗需求与所有研究因素之间的关联具有统计学意义。这一发现与早期结果一致。然而,当将研究因素纳入一个解释模型时,情况发生了变化。逻辑回归分析显示,诊断亚组是TMD治疗需求的最强预测因素。总压力得分显著增加了模型的解释力,但年龄和性别没有。女性表现出更多TMD体征和症状这一常见观察结果,似乎可以通过她们较高的压力得分和症状类型来解释。