Epker J, Gatchel R J
Department of Psychiatry, Division of Psychology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, Texas 75390-9044, USA.
J Orofac Pain. 2000 Fall;14(4):303-9.
To determine potential differences in predictive models of acute temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients divided into groups based on the physiologic characteristics of their TMD.
One hundred seventy-seven acute TMD patients were evaluated with an extensive battery that included biologic and psychosocial measures. Subjects were separated into 3 groups based on a physical exam using the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC): those with a myofascial pain diagnosis, those with either a disc displacement or other joint condition, and those who reported pain but did not receive an RDC Axis I diagnosis. Six months later, it was determined whether patients had sought additional treatment for relief of their symptoms. Treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking groups were compared for significant differences, and predictive models were generated to determine the array of variables that best predicted treatment-seeking behavior among each of the 3 classifications of TMD patients used in this study.
Among patients with a diagnosis of myofascial pain, gender, Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) interference score, and MPI affective distress score accurately predicted treatment-seeking behavior in 76.1% of the sample. For patients with a diagnosis of disc displacement, arthralgia, arthritis, or arthrosis, the following variables predicted treatment utilization behavior in 93.6% of the sample: race, RDC graded chronic pain, and the introversion scale of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2. For patients with no RDC Axis I disorder, 80.5% of the sample was accurately classified with regard to treatment-seeking behavior through the use of only the characteristic pain intensity score (i.e., mean of visual analog scale scores for "pain right now," "worst pain," and "average pain").
The factors that predict which acute TMD patients are most likely to seek additional treatment vary depending on the physiologic basis of their TMD. This suggests that acute TMD patients may benefit from different modalities of treatment, depending on the type of TMD with which they present.
根据颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)患者的生理特征分组,确定急性TMD患者预测模型中的潜在差异。
对177例急性TMD患者进行了广泛的评估,包括生物学和心理社会测量。根据使用颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准(RDC)的体格检查,将受试者分为3组:肌筋膜疼痛诊断组、盘移位或其他关节疾病组以及报告疼痛但未获得RDC轴I诊断的组。六个月后,确定患者是否寻求了额外治疗以缓解症状。比较寻求治疗组和未寻求治疗组的显著差异,并生成预测模型,以确定在本研究中使用的3种TMD患者分类中,最能预测寻求治疗行为的变量组合。
在肌筋膜疼痛诊断患者中,性别、多维疼痛量表(MPI)干扰得分和MPI情感痛苦得分在76.1%的样本中准确预测了寻求治疗行为。对于诊断为盘移位、关节痛、关节炎或关节病的患者,以下变量在93.6%的样本中预测了治疗利用行为:种族、RDC分级慢性疼痛以及明尼苏达多相人格问卷-2的内向量表。对于无RDC轴I障碍的患者,仅通过使用特征性疼痛强度得分(即“当前疼痛”、“最严重疼痛”和“平均疼痛”的视觉模拟量表得分的平均值),80.5%的样本在寻求治疗行为方面被准确分类。
预测哪些急性TMD患者最有可能寻求额外治疗的因素因TMD的生理基础而异。这表明,急性TMD患者可能根据其所患TMD的类型从不同的治疗方式中受益。