Ng B P, Purton D G, Hood J A
University of Otago, School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Oper Dent. 1998 Mar-Apr;23(3):113-20.
In this in vitro study, where alloys were condensed into unset paste lining materials, shear bond strengths were significantly greater than with the unlined controls. The use of varnish or Paama 2 linings did not significantly increase the shear bond strength of amalgam or gallium alloy restorations. The use of Vitrabond, Vitremer, or Resinomer liners significantly increased the shear bond strength compared to unlined restorations. Permite C restorations lined with Resinomer all showed cohesive failure within the mixed alloy/ liner. Of the unlined restorations, Permite C had significantly higher shear bond strength than Lojic Plus. The experimental method used in the present study proved to be suitable for quantitative comparison of the shear bond strength of different dental materials.
在这项体外研究中,将合金冷凝到未凝固的糊剂衬层材料中时,剪切粘结强度明显高于未衬层的对照组。使用清漆或Paama 2衬层并没有显著提高汞合金或镓合金修复体的剪切粘结强度。与未衬层的修复体相比,使用Vitrabond、Vitremer或树脂衬层显著提高了剪切粘结强度。用树脂衬层的Permite C修复体在混合合金/衬层内均表现为内聚破坏。在未衬层的修复体中,Permite C的剪切粘结强度明显高于Lojic Plus。本研究中使用的实验方法被证明适用于不同牙科材料剪切粘结强度的定量比较。