Fournillier A, Nakano I, Vitvitski L, Depla E, Vidalin O, Maertens G, Trépo C, Inchauspé G
INSERM U271, Virus des hépatites, Rétrovirus humains et Pathologies associées, Lyon, France.
Hepatology. 1998 Jul;28(1):237-44. doi: 10.1002/hep.510280131.
Different delivery routes of plasmid DNA may result in the induction of differential humoral and cellular immunity. We have studied the influence of two main routes of plasmid injection, performed intramuscularly and intraepidermally using a gene gun, for the induction of immune responses specific to hepatitis C virus (HCV) envelope protein E2. Three plasmids expressing different immunogenic domains of E2 (amino acids [aa] 384443, aa 504-555, and aa 384-746) were injected into BALB/c mice according to five different protocols using various combinations of intramuscular (i.m.) or intraepidermal (i.e.) primary and booster injections. Seroconversion rates, antibody titers and isotypes, epitope recognition, and T-helper (Th) release cytokine profiles were analyzed. Antibody titers and epitope recognition were linked to either or both the nature of the immunogen expressed and the delivery route chosen. In all cases, the lowest antibody titers were obtained using single i.m.-based protocols. Independently of the antibody titers generated, only some specific i.e.-combined delivery routes induced antibodies able to recognize determinants located in the N-terminal of E2 (aa 384411 and aa 411437) and mimicked by synthetic peptides. By contrast, the antibody isotypes and the splenic cytokine production identified were independent of the plasmids used and the delivery route implemented. All conditions resulted in Th-1 like responses suggested by the exclusive detection of IgG2a and 2b antibodies and the production of interferon gamma (INF-gamma) but no interleukin-4 (IL-4). Overall, our results suggest that the combination of i.m. and i.e. delivery routes provides the most efficient way to induce a broad immune response against HCV-E2.
质粒DNA的不同递送途径可能导致不同的体液免疫和细胞免疫诱导。我们研究了两种主要的质粒注射途径的影响,即通过基因枪进行肌肉内注射和表皮内注射,以诱导针对丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)包膜蛋白E2的特异性免疫反应。根据五种不同方案,使用肌肉内(i.m.)或表皮内(i.e.)初次和加强注射的各种组合,将三种表达E2不同免疫原性结构域(氨基酸[aa]384 - 443、aa504 - 555和aa384 - 746)的质粒注射到BALB/c小鼠体内。分析了血清转化率、抗体滴度和亚型、表位识别以及辅助性T细胞(Th)释放的细胞因子谱。抗体滴度和表位识别与所表达免疫原的性质和所选递送途径中的一种或两者有关。在所有情况下,使用基于单次肌肉内注射的方案获得的抗体滴度最低。与产生的抗体滴度无关,只有一些特定的表皮内联合递送途径诱导产生的抗体能够识别位于E2 N端(aa(384 - 411和aa411 - 437))且可被合成肽模拟的决定簇。相比之下,所鉴定的抗体亚型和脾脏细胞因子产生与所用质粒和实施的递送途径无关。所有条件均导致Th-1样反应,这通过仅检测到IgG2a和2b抗体以及产生干扰素γ(INF-γ)但未检测到白细胞介素-4(IL-4)得以表明。总体而言,我们的结果表明,肌肉内和表皮内递送途径的组合提供了诱导针对HCV-E2的广泛免疫反应的最有效方法。