Vidalin O, Fournillier A, Renard N, Chen M, Depla E, Boucreux D, Brinster C, Baumert T, Nakano I, Fukuda Y, Liljeström P, Trépo C, Inchauspé G
INSERM U271-151, Cours Albert Thomas, 69424 Lyon Cedex 03, France.
Virology. 2000 Oct 25;276(2):259-70. doi: 10.1006/viro.2000.0566.
Replicating and nonreplicating nucleic acid-based vaccines as well as Semliki Forest-recombinant Viruses (rSFVs) were evaluated for the development of a vaccine against hepatitis C virus (HCV). Replicating SFV-DNA vaccines (pSFV) and rSFVs expressing HCV core or E2 antigens were compared with classical CMV-driven plasmids (pCMV) in single or bimodal vaccine protocols. In vitro experiments indicated that all vaccine vectors produced the HCV antigens but to different levels depending on the antigen expressed. Both replicating and nonreplicating core-expressing plasmids induced, upon injection in mice, specific comparable CTL responses ranging from 10 to 50% lysis (E:T ratio 100:1). Comparison of different injection modes (intramuscular versus intraepidermal) and the use of descalating doses of DNA (1-100 microgram) did not show an increased efficacy of the core-SFV plasmid compared with the CMV-driven one. Surprisingly, rSFVs yielded either no detectable anticore CTL or very low anti-E2 antibody titers following either single or bimodal administration together with CMV-expressing counterparts. Prime-boost experiments revealed, in all cases, the superiority of DNA-based only vaccines. The anti-E2 antibody response was evaluated using three different assays which indicated that all generated anti-E2 antibodies were targeted at similar determinants. This study emphasizes the potential of DNA-based vaccines for induction of anti-HCV immune responses and reveals an unexpected and limited benefit of SFV-based vaccinal approaches in the case of HCV core and E2.
对用于研发丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)疫苗的复制型和非复制型核酸疫苗以及辛德毕斯重组病毒(rSFV)进行了评估。在单模式或双模式疫苗方案中,将表达HCV核心或E2抗原的复制型SFV-DNA疫苗(pSFV)和rSFV与经典的巨细胞病毒驱动质粒(pCMV)进行了比较。体外实验表明,所有疫苗载体都能产生HCV抗原,但根据所表达的抗原不同,产生的水平也不同。在注射到小鼠体内后,复制型和非复制型表达核心的质粒均诱导出了特异性相当的CTL反应,裂解率在10%至50%之间(效应细胞与靶细胞比例为100:1)。不同注射方式(肌肉注射与表皮内注射)的比较以及递减剂量DNA(1 - 100微克)的使用,并未显示出核心-SFV质粒比巨细胞病毒驱动的质粒具有更高的效力。令人惊讶的是,在与表达CMV的对应物进行单模式或双模式给药后,rSFV要么未产生可检测到的抗核心CTL,要么产生的抗E2抗体滴度非常低。初免-加强实验在所有情况下均显示,仅基于DNA的疫苗具有优越性。使用三种不同的检测方法评估了抗E2抗体反应,结果表明所有产生的抗E2抗体都针对相似的决定簇。这项研究强调了基于DNA的疫苗诱导抗HCV免疫反应的潜力,并揭示了在HCV核心和E2方面基于SFV的疫苗接种方法具有意外且有限的益处。