Kahn M A, Stanton S L
University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555-0587, USA.
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1998;9(1):37-47. doi: 10.1007/BF01900540.
Gynecologists have traditionally evaluated rectocele repair by its effect on vaginal function; coloproctologists have traditionally evaluated its effect on bowel function. Hence different operative criteria and surgical techniques have arisen, but with very little prospective, objective evaluation. The purpose of this review is to describe the surgical techniques used to repair the rectocele and the most common investigations used during its evaluation. Anorectal investigations identify concomitant pathology, may explain pathophysiology, provide objective outcome criteria and attempt to predict the patients that will most benefit from surgery. However, because of the complex neuromuscular, physiological and mechanical interactions that contribute to impaired rectal emptying, their usefulness in improving functional outcome has been limited. Many patients experience improvement, but still are left with some symptoms of impaired defecation despite anatomic correction.
传统上,妇科医生通过直肠膨出修复对阴道功能的影响来评估其效果;结直肠外科医生则传统上通过其对肠道功能的影响来评估。因此,出现了不同的手术标准和手术技术,但前瞻性、客观的评估却很少。本综述的目的是描述用于修复直肠膨出的手术技术以及评估期间最常用的检查。肛肠检查可识别伴随的病理状况,可能解释病理生理学,提供客观的结果标准,并试图预测最能从手术中获益的患者。然而,由于导致直肠排空受损的神经肌肉、生理和机械相互作用复杂,它们在改善功能结果方面的作用有限。许多患者病情有所改善,但尽管进行了解剖矫正,仍存在一些排便功能受损的症状。