Wong J B
Department of Medicine, New England Medical Center, Tupper Research Institute, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 1998 Apr-Jun;61(2):238-42.
With recognition that resources are limited, health care payers and policy makers have increasingly turned toward economic analyses to determine whether particular therapies are an efficient use of economic resources. Both chronic hepatitis B and C infections can progress to cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma over time. Interferon treatment has been shown to eradicate viremia, but only does so in a proportion of treated patients. It has potential side effects, has no proven long-term benefit on complications and is relatively expensive.
To determine the cost-effectiveness of interferon treatment by estimating the lifelong economic and clinical outcomes associated with interferon therapy versus standard care for patients with either chronic hepatitis B or C infection.
Computer cohort Markov model simulation to project the lifelong impact of the loss of hepatitis B or C viremia resulting from interferon on cirrhosis, life expectancy, and costs. The natural history of hepatitis B and C was based on published studies. Efficacy estimates for the loss of viremia were based on meta-analysis of published data. Using a societal perspective, economic estimates were based on cost of care data for patients with hepatitis and from estimates regarding the frequency of health resource utilization provided by expert panels.
For 20 year old patients with either hepatitis B e antigen positive chronic hepatitis or histologically mild chronic hepatitis C infection, interferon should be cost saving, extending life and reducing lifetime expenditures and morbidity. Life expectancy should increase by 4.8 to 3.1 years for patients with chronic hepatitis B or C, respectively. Lifetime costs should be reduced on average by $6,300 to $6,900 for each patient treated with interferon.
Chronic infection with hepatitis B or C can result in liver failure and death. Although only effective in a proportion of treated patients, interferon for chronic hepatitis appears to be an efficient use of societal resources so that economic reasons should not limit its use.
鉴于认识到资源有限,医疗保健支付方和政策制定者越来越多地借助经济分析来确定特定疗法是否是对经济资源的有效利用。慢性乙型和丙型肝炎感染随着时间推移都可能进展为肝硬化或肝细胞癌。干扰素治疗已被证明可消除病毒血症,但仅在一部分接受治疗的患者中如此。它有潜在的副作用,对并发症没有已证实的长期益处,且相对昂贵。
通过估计与干扰素治疗相比,慢性乙型或丙型肝炎感染患者接受标准治疗的终身经济和临床结果,来确定干扰素治疗的成本效益。
采用计算机队列马尔可夫模型模拟,以预测干扰素导致的乙型或丙型肝炎病毒血症消失对肝硬化、预期寿命和成本的终身影响。乙型和丙型肝炎的自然病史基于已发表的研究。病毒血症消失的疗效估计基于已发表数据的荟萃分析。从社会角度来看,经济估计基于肝炎患者的护理成本数据以及专家小组提供的卫生资源利用频率估计。
对于20岁的乙型肝炎e抗原阳性慢性肝炎或组织学上轻度慢性丙型肝炎感染患者,干扰素治疗应具有成本节约效益,可延长寿命并降低终身支出和发病率。慢性乙型或丙型肝炎患者的预期寿命应分别增加4.8年至3.1年。接受干扰素治疗的每位患者的终身成本平均应降低6300美元至6900美元。
慢性乙型或丙型肝炎感染可导致肝衰竭和死亡。虽然干扰素仅对一部分接受治疗的患者有效,但慢性肝炎用干扰素治疗似乎是对社会资源的有效利用,因此经济因素不应限制其使用。