• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

台湾地区干扰素-α治疗慢性乙型肝炎的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of interferon-alpha therapy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in Taiwan.

作者信息

Pwu Raoh-Fang, Chan K Arnold

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei.

出版信息

J Formos Med Assoc. 2002 Sep;101(9):632-41.

PMID:12645191
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although interferon-alpha has been approved for chronic hepatitis B treatment in Taiwan, the high price necessitates study of its cost-effectiveness to define its role from a burden of disease perspective.

METHOD

A stimulation model was constructed to project the long-term effects of interferon treatment or standard care for a hypothetical group of 35-year-old chronic hepatitis B patients in Taiwan. Data on interferon treatment efficacy, disease progression, vital statistics, medical expenditure for various liver disease states, and quality-of-life measures based on Taiwan data were collected and used in the model.

RESULTS

The model indicated that a 35-year-old chronic hepatitis B patient treated with interferon in Taiwan would have a life expectancy of 29.08 years, versus 28.67 years for the same patient who did not receive interferon. Corresponding to this gain in life expectancy of 0.41 years (or 0.18 quality-adjusted life-years, QALYs), the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was 492.000 New Taiwan dollars (NT$; 14,200 US$ at 34.7 NT$/US$) per QALY with an annual 3% discount rate. Monte Carlo simulation taking into account the range of plausible values for all model parameters indicated that 95% of the ICERs were in the range of 65,000 NT$ (1.900 US$)/QALY to 683,000 NT$ (19,700 US$)/QALY, and 90% of the ICERs were below 413,000 NT$ (11,900 US$)/QALY.

CONCLUSION

Interferon has a favorable cost-effectiveness profile in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in Taiwan. However, the study results cannot be interpreted in isolation and need to be compared with the cost-effectiveness profiles of treatment regimens for other major chronic diseases in Taiwan.

摘要

背景与目的

尽管α干扰素已在台湾获批用于慢性乙型肝炎的治疗,但因其价格高昂,有必要对其成本效益进行研究,以便从疾病负担的角度明确其作用。

方法

构建了一个模拟模型,以预测对台湾一组假设的35岁慢性乙型肝炎患者进行干扰素治疗或标准治疗的长期效果。收集了基于台湾数据的干扰素治疗疗效、疾病进展、人口统计数据、各种肝病状态的医疗支出以及生活质量指标等数据,并将其用于该模型。

结果

该模型表明,在台湾接受干扰素治疗的35岁慢性乙型肝炎患者的预期寿命为29.08岁,而未接受干扰素治疗的同一名患者的预期寿命为28.67岁。对应于预期寿命增加0.41年(或0.18个质量调整生命年,QALY),在年贴现率为3%的情况下,增量成本效益比(ICER)为每QALY 492,000新台币(按34.7新台币/美元换算为14,200美元)。考虑到所有模型参数的合理取值范围进行的蒙特卡洛模拟表明,95%的ICER在65,000新台币(1,900美元)/QALY至683,000新台币(19,700美元)/QALY范围内,90%的ICER低于413,000新台币(11,900美元)/QALY。

结论

在台湾,干扰素治疗慢性乙型肝炎具有良好的成本效益。然而,该研究结果不能孤立地进行解读,需要与台湾其他主要慢性病治疗方案的成本效益情况进行比较。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of interferon-alpha therapy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in Taiwan.台湾地区干扰素-α治疗慢性乙型肝炎的成本效益分析。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2002 Sep;101(9):632-41.
2
HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: cost-effectiveness of peginterferon alfa-2a compared to lamivudine in Taiwan.HBeAg阴性慢性乙型肝炎:在台湾,聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a与拉米夫定相比的成本效益
Value Health. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):131-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00221.x.
3
Cost-effectiveness of peginterferon alpha-2a compared to lamivudine treatment in patients with hepatitis B e antigen positive chronic hepatitis B in Taiwan.聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a与拉米夫定治疗台湾地区乙肝e抗原阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者的成本效益分析
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Sep;22(9):1494-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04539.x.
4
Treatment of chronic hepatitis B with interferon-alpha: cost-effectiveness in developing countries.α干扰素治疗慢性乙型肝炎:发展中国家的成本效益
Natl Med J India. 2002 Nov-Dec;15(6):320-7.
5
Chronic hepatitis B treatment: the cost-effectiveness of interferon compared to lamivudine.慢性乙型肝炎治疗:干扰素与拉米夫定的成本效益比较。
Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5 Suppl 1):S24-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.011.
6
Interferon treatment for chronic hepatitis B or C infection: costs and effectiveness.慢性乙型或丙型肝炎感染的干扰素治疗:成本与效果
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 1998 Apr-Jun;61(2):238-42.
7
The cost-effectiveness of alternative therapeutic strategies for the management of chronic hepatitis B in Poland.波兰慢性乙型肝炎治疗替代策略的成本效益
Value Health. 2002 Sep-Oct;5(5):405-21. doi: 10.1046/J.1524-4733.2002.55147.x.
8
Economic Analysis and Budget Impact of Tenofovir and Entecavir in the First-Line Treatment of Hepatitis B Virus in Italy.意大利替诺福韦和恩替卡韦一线治疗乙型肝炎病毒的经济分析和预算影响。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Aug;15(4):479-490. doi: 10.1007/s40258-017-0311-4.
9
Population health impact and cost-effectiveness of monitoring inactive chronic hepatitis B and treating eligible patients in Shanghai, China.监测中国上海地区慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染者的成本效益及对人群健康的影响。
Hepatology. 2014 Jul;60(1):46-55. doi: 10.1002/hep.26934. Epub 2014 May 27.
10
Cost-Effectiveness of Peg-Interferon, Interferon and Oral Nucleoside Analogues in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B and D Infections in China.聚乙二醇干扰素、干扰素及口服核苷类似物在中国治疗慢性乙型和丁型肝炎感染中的成本效益
Clin Drug Investig. 2016 Aug;36(8):637-48. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0409-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral antiviral therapy in patients with indeterminate chronic hepatitis B infection.慢性乙型肝炎感染状态不明患者口服抗病毒治疗的成本效益分析
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jul 14;10:43. doi: 10.21037/tgh-24-163. eCollection 2025.
2
Are Published Health Economic Models for Chronic Hepatitis B Appropriately Capturing the Benefits of HBsAg Loss? A Systematic Literature Review.已发表的慢性乙型肝炎健康经济模型是否恰当地体现了乙肝表面抗原消失的益处?一项系统文献综述。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2020 Sep;4(3):403-418. doi: 10.1007/s41669-019-00175-w.
3
Cost effectiveness of entecavir versus lamivudine with adefovir salvage in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B.
恩替卡韦与拉米夫定联合阿德福韦挽救治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎的成本效益分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(11):963-77. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725110-00006.