Haertsch M, Campbell E, Sanson-Fisher R
Centre for Education, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 1998 Jun;22(4):471-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1998.tb01416.x.
To describe the types of antenatal services in NSW maternity hospitals and examine the views of midwives and obstetricians about who can provide adequate routine antenatal care.
A mail-out questionnaire to nursing unit managers (NUMs) explored the types of antenatal services available in their hospitals. The questionnaire for 196 midwives and 114 obstetricians asked whether they believed six provider/service types could provide adequate antenatal care either alone or in conjunction with an obstetrician.
80% of hospitals had GPs providing antenatal care, 53% had obstetricians and 3% had visiting midwives; 33% had a public antenatal clinic, 28% a shared care program with GPs and 26% midwives' antenatal clinics. Midwives were more likely than obstetricians to rate the following as able to provide adequate care alone: hospital antenatal clinic (4.7 times more likely); independent midwife (42.9x); and community midwives as an outreach hospital service (17x). Obstetricians were 8.2x more likely than midwives to rate private obstetricians as being able to provide adequate care. Midwives were more likely to perceive that independent midwives (24.7x more likely) and community midwives as an outreach hospital service (15.3x more likely) were able to provide adequate care either alone or in conjunction with an obstetrician.
Most NSW hospitals have GPs providing care, but midwives' clinics and independent midwives are less available. While midwives and obstetricians hold similar beliefs about GPs providing care, substantial differences emerged about the midwife's role. Such disparity in opinion may be central in providing options and consistency in care for women.
描述新南威尔士州产科医院的产前服务类型,并探讨助产士和产科医生对于谁能够提供充分常规产前护理的看法。
向护理单元经理(NUMs)邮寄调查问卷,以探究其所在医院提供的产前服务类型。针对196名助产士和114名产科医生的调查问卷询问了他们是否认为六种提供者/服务类型能够单独或与产科医生联合提供充分的产前护理。
80%的医院有全科医生提供产前护理,53%有产科医生,3%有助产士上门服务;33%有公立产前诊所,28%有与全科医生的共享护理项目,26%有助产士产前诊所。与产科医生相比,助产士更有可能认为以下机构能够单独提供充分护理:医院产前诊所(可能性高4.7倍);独立助产士(42.9倍);以及作为医院外展服务的社区助产士(17倍)。产科医生认为私立产科医生能够提供充分护理的可能性比助产士高8.2倍。助产士更有可能认为独立助产士(可能性高24.7倍)和作为医院外展服务的社区助产士(可能性高15.3倍)能够单独或与产科医生联合提供充分护理。
新南威尔士州的大多数医院由全科医生提供护理,但助产士诊所和独立助产士较少。虽然助产士和产科医生对于全科医生提供护理的看法相似,但在助产士的角色方面出现了重大差异。这种意见差异可能是为女性提供护理选择和连贯性的核心所在。