• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水灌肠计算机断层扫描(WE-CT)在低位结直肠肿瘤局部分期中的应用:与经直肠超声的比较

Water enema computed tomography (WE-CT) in the local staging of low colorectal neoplasms: comparison with transrectal ultrasound.

作者信息

Caseiro-Alves F, Gonçalo M, Cruz L, Ilharco J, Leite J, Agostinho A, Castro e Sousa F, Vilaça-Ramos H

机构信息

Serviço de Radiologia, Hospital Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

Abdom Imaging. 1998 Jul-Aug;23(4):370-4. doi: 10.1007/s002619900363.

DOI:10.1007/s002619900363
PMID:9663271
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To determine the accuracy of computed tomography performed with a water enema application (WE-CT) in the local staging of low colorectal neoplasms and to compare the results with those of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS).

METHODS

Forty patients with low colorectal tumors were evaluated prospectively by CT with the simultaneous administration of a lukewarm rectal enema (0.5-1.5 L). Thin slices (5 mm) and intravenous application of iodinated contrast media were routinely used. TRUS was performed in 18 patients. Tumor size, location, and staging according to the TNM classification of the UICC were registered. Tumors were classified as < T3 (T1 or T2) or as T3 or T4. For staging peritumoral lymph node metastases on WE-CT, two criteria of positivity were tested: N+ if at least one peritumoral node > or 5 mm in diameter was seen (reading A); N+ if at least one peritumoral node > or = 5 mm or three peritumoral nodes < 5 mm were identified (reading B).

RESULTS

For the tumor staging, WE-CT showed a sensitivity of 90%, a specificity of 73%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 90%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 73%, and an accuracy of 85%. For TRUS, the results were sensitivity of 73%, specificity of 29%, PPV of 62%, NPV of 40%, and an accuracy of 39%. Concerning nodal staging with WE-CT, results were superior when reading A was used: sensitivity = 84%, specificity = 83%, PPV = 73%, NPV = 91%, and accuracy = 84%. TRUS showed a sensitivity of 29%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 67%, and an accuracy of 71%.

CONCLUSION

WE-CT is a reliable technique for the local staging of low colorectal tumors that can be superior to TRUS. For diagnosis of peritumoral metastatic lymph nodes on WE-CT, the 5-mm diameter cutoff value is the most appropriate size criterion.

摘要

背景

确定水灌肠CT(WE-CT)在低位结直肠肿瘤局部分期中的准确性,并将结果与经直肠超声检查(TRUS)的结果进行比较。

方法

对40例低位结直肠肿瘤患者进行前瞻性评估,采用CT同时给予温直肠灌肠(0.5-1.5L)。常规使用薄层(5mm)扫描并静脉注射碘化造影剂。18例患者进行了TRUS检查。记录肿瘤大小、位置以及根据国际抗癌联盟(UICC)的TNM分类进行的分期。肿瘤分为<T3(T1或T2)或T3或T4。对于WE-CT上肿瘤周围淋巴结转移的分期,测试了两种阳性标准:如果看到至少一个肿瘤周围淋巴结直径>或=5mm,则为N+(解读A);如果识别出至少一个肿瘤周围淋巴结>或=5mm或三个肿瘤周围淋巴结<5mm,则为N+(解读B)。

结果

对于肿瘤分期,WE-CT显示敏感性为90%,特异性为73%,阳性预测值(PPV)为90%,阴性预测值(NPV)为73%,准确性为85%。对于TRUS,结果为敏感性73%,特异性29%,PPV为62%,NPV为40%,准确性为39%。关于WE-CT的淋巴结分期,使用解读A时结果更佳:敏感性=84%,特异性=83%,PPV=73%,NPV=91%,准确性=84%。TRUS显示敏感性为29%,特异性为100%,PPV为100%,NPV为

相似文献

1
Water enema computed tomography (WE-CT) in the local staging of low colorectal neoplasms: comparison with transrectal ultrasound.水灌肠计算机断层扫描(WE-CT)在低位结直肠肿瘤局部分期中的应用:与经直肠超声的比较
Abdom Imaging. 1998 Jul-Aug;23(4):370-4. doi: 10.1007/s002619900363.
2
Accuracy of water-enema multidetector computed tomography (WE-MDCT) in colon cancer staging: a prospective study.水灌肠多层螺旋计算机断层扫描(WE-MDCT)在结肠癌分期中的准确性:一项前瞻性研究。
Abdom Imaging. 2014 Oct;39(5):941-8. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0150-9.
3
Prediction of rectal lymph node metastasis by pelvic computed tomography measurement.通过盆腔计算机断层扫描测量预测直肠淋巴结转移
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Feb;35(2):168-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.02.006. Epub 2008 Mar 24.
4
Local staging of rectal cancer: assessment with double-contrast multislice computed tomography and transrectal ultrasound.直肠癌的局部分期:多层螺旋CT双对比造影及经直肠超声评估
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004 Jan-Feb;28(1):123-30. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200401000-00021.
5
Preoperative staging of rectal tumors: comparison of endorectal ultrasound, hydro-CT, and high-resolution endorectal MRI.直肠肿瘤的术前分期:直肠内超声、水灌肠CT及高分辨率直肠内MRI的比较
Onkologie. 2008 May;31(5):230-5. doi: 10.1159/000121359. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
6
[Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0T high-resolution MRI for assessment mesorectal lymph node metastases in patients with rectal cancer].[3.0T高分辨率磁共振成像评估直肠癌患者中直肠系膜淋巴结转移的诊断准确性]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jul 25;21(7):786-792.
7
Transrectal ultrasound and computed tomography in preoperative staging of lower rectal adenocarcinoma.经直肠超声和计算机断层扫描在低位直肠腺癌术前分期中的应用
Gastrointest Radiol. 1991 Summer;16(3):259-63. doi: 10.1007/BF01887361.
8
Comparison of (11)C-choline PET/CT and enhanced CT in the evaluation of patients with pulmonary abnormalities and locoregional lymph node involvement in lung cancer.(11)C-胆碱 PET/CT 与增强 CT 在肺癌肺部异常和局部区域淋巴结受累患者评估中的比较。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2012 Jul;13(4):312-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Dec 17.
9
Rectal cancer: CT local staging with histopathologic correlation.直肠癌:CT局部分期与组织病理学相关性
Abdom Imaging. 2001 Mar-Apr;26(2):134-8. doi: 10.1007/s002610000154.
10
[Preoperative diagnostic procedures in locally advanced rectal carcinoma (> or =T3 or N+). What does endoluminal ultrasound achieve at staging and restaging (after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy) in contrast to computed tomography?].[局部进展期直肠癌(≥T3 或 N+)的术前诊断程序。与计算机断层扫描相比,腔内超声在分期及新辅助放化疗后的再分期中能达到什么效果?]
Chirurg. 2003 Mar;74(3):224-34. doi: 10.1007/s00104-002-0609-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Does a learning curve exist in endorectal two-dimensional ultrasound accuracy?直肠内二维超声检查的准确性是否存在学习曲线?
Tech Coloproctol. 2011 Sep;15(3):301-11. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0711-7. Epub 2011 Jul 9.