Miyatake T, Koyamada N, Hancock W W, Soares M P, Bach F H
Center for Immunobiology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Transplantation. 1998 Jun 27;65(12):1563-9. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199806270-00005.
Accommodation designates the survival of vascularized grafts in the presence of circulating antigraft antibodies and complement. In the hamster-to-rat model, accommodation is associated with an ongoing T helper (Th)2 cytokine response and the expression of "protective genes" by the graft endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells. In this report, we tested whether accommodated xenografts would be protected from rejection upon retransplantation into second recipients treated with cyclosporine (CsA), a treatment that does not prolong survival of a fresh hamster heart.
Long-term survival of hamster-to-rat cardiac xenografts was achieved using either CsA plus cobra venom factor (CVF) or CsA plus rapamycin. Xenografts that survived long term in their first recipients were retransplanted into second recipients treated with CsA.
Long-term xenograft survival in CsA/CVF-treated recipients was associated with an ongoing Th2 response, expression of protective genes, and deposition of elicited xenoreactive antibodies and complement on the graft endothelium. In CsA/rapamycin-treated recipients, long-term xenograft survival occurred in the presence of basal levels of antigraft antibodies and was not associated with a Th2 cytokine response or the expression of protective genes. Xenografts from CsA/CVF-treated rats survived significantly longer upon retransplantation into second recipients treated with CsA (77.3% >10 days) as compared with xenografts from CsA/rapamycin-treated rats (4-11 days) or naive hearts (3-4 days). Moreover, 30-35% of xenografts from CsA/CVF rats survived long term and accommodated in the second recipient.
Accommodated xenografts can have significantly prolonged acceptance when retransplanted into second recipients treated with CsA alone; in contrast, naive hearts or hearts that survived long term in first recipients, but did not accommodate, did not survive long term in the second recipients. We suggest that prolonged survival of accommodated xenografts is due to the expression of the protective genes A20, bcl-2 bcl-xL, and heme oxygenase-1 in the xenograft endothelium and possibly smooth muscle cells.
适应性改变指的是在存在循环抗移植抗体和补体的情况下血管化移植物的存活。在仓鼠-大鼠模型中,适应性改变与持续的辅助性T细胞(Th)2细胞因子反应以及移植物内皮细胞和平滑肌细胞中“保护性基因”的表达相关。在本报告中,我们测试了适应性改变的异种移植物再次移植到用环孢素(CsA)治疗的第二受体中时是否能免受排斥,CsA治疗并不能延长新鲜仓鼠心脏的存活时间。
使用CsA加眼镜蛇毒因子(CVF)或CsA加拉帕霉素实现仓鼠-大鼠心脏异种移植物的长期存活。在其第一受体中长期存活的异种移植物被再次移植到用CsA治疗的第二受体中。
在接受CsA/CVF治疗的受体中,异种移植物的长期存活与持续的Th2反应、保护性基因的表达以及诱导产生的异种反应性抗体和补体在移植物内皮上的沉积相关。在接受CsA/雷帕霉素治疗的受体中,异种移植物在抗移植抗体基础水平存在的情况下实现长期存活,且与Th2细胞因子反应或保护性基因的表达无关。与来自接受CsA/雷帕霉素治疗的大鼠的异种移植物(4 - 11天)或未处理的心脏(3 - 4天)相比,来自接受CsA/CVF治疗的大鼠的异种移植物再次移植到接受CsA治疗的第二受体中时存活时间显著更长(77.3% >10天)。此外,来自接受CsA/CVF治疗的大鼠的异种移植物中有30 - 35%长期存活并在第二受体中实现了适应性改变。
适应性改变的异种移植物再次移植到仅用CsA治疗的第二受体中时,其接受时间可显著延长;相比之下,未处理的心脏或在第一受体中长期存活但未发生适应性改变的心脏,在第二受体中不能长期存活。我们认为,适应性改变的异种移植物的长期存活归因于异种移植物内皮细胞以及可能还有平滑肌细胞中保护性基因A20、bcl-2、bcl-xL和血红素加氧酶-1的表达。