Kim D H, Bae D H, Hur M, Kim S H
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chung-Ang University, Pil-Dong Hospital, 82-1, 2Ga, Pil-Dong, Chung-Gu, Seoul, Korea.
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1998 Aug;5(3):253-60. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(98)80028-5.
To evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic hysterectomy and compare classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy (CISH) with total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH).
Retrospective review (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
University-affiliated hospital.
Six hundred fifty women who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy from August 1993 to August 1996.
Charts of 231 women undergoing CISH, 102 TLH, and 317 LAVH were reviewed regarding patient characteristics, indications, uterine weight, associated procedures, estimated blood loss, operating time, and complications.
Among the three groups, despite having the largest specimen weight and highest number of associated procedures, women undergoing CISH had the lowest complication rate and smallest amount of estimated blood loss (p <0.05). The next lowest was the TLH group (p <0.05). Although LAVH was associated with shortest operating time, there were no statistically significant differences among groups (p >0.05). The CISH group had relatively shorter operating times when compared with similar average specimen weights. Patients who underwent total hysterectomy by either TLH or LAVH had more postoperative visits than those having CISH (p <0.05, Fisher's exact test); the LAVH group had the highest number of postoperative visits. The overall complication rate appeared to be highest in the LAVH group (p <0.05, Fisher's exact test).
Among the three groups, CISH resulted in lowest blood loss and fewest complications; these values were also lower for TLH than for LAVH. If the cervix is removed along with the uterus, TLH is recommended. In our opinion, CISH is preferred in cases of benign uterine diseases because it lowers major operative complications, especially in women who have large masses with no pathologic lesions of the cervix.
评估腹腔镜子宫切除术的疗效,并比较经典筋膜内子宫次全切除术(CISH)与全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)及腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)。
回顾性研究(加拿大工作组分类II - 2)。
大学附属医院。
1993年8月至1996年8月期间接受腹腔镜子宫切除术的650名女性。
回顾了231例行CISH、102例行TLH和317例行LAVH患者的病历,内容包括患者特征、手术指征、子宫重量、相关手术、估计失血量、手术时间及并发症。
在三组中,尽管行CISH的女性标本重量最大且相关手术数量最多,但并发症发生率最低,估计失血量最少(p<0.05)。其次是TLH组(p<0.05)。虽然LAVH手术时间最短,但各组间无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。与平均标本重量相似的情况相比,CISH组手术时间相对较短。行TLH或LAVH全子宫切除术的患者术后就诊次数比行CISH的患者多(p<0.05,Fisher精确检验);LAVH组术后就诊次数最多。LAVH组总体并发症发生率似乎最高(p<0.05,Fisher精确检验)。
在三组中,CISH导致的失血量最少,并发症最少;TLH的这些指标也低于LAVH。如果子宫和宫颈一并切除,推荐行TLH。我们认为,对于良性子宫疾病,CISH更可取,因为它能降低主要手术并发症,尤其是对于有大肿块且宫颈无病理病变的女性。