Hogan C A, Turner C W
Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, New York 14642, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Jul;104(1):432-41. doi: 10.1121/1.423247.
The present study was a systematic investigation of the benefit of providing hearing-impaired listeners with audible high-frequency speech information. Five normal-hearing and nine high-frequency hearing-impaired listeners identified nonsense syllables that were low-pass filtered at a number of cutoff frequencies. As a means of quantifying audibility for each condition, Articulation Index (AI) was calculated for each condition for each listener. Most hearing-impaired listeners demonstrated an improvement in speech recognition as additional audible high-frequency information was provided. In some cases for more severely impaired listeners, increasing the audibility of high-frequency speech information resulted in no further improvement in speech recognition, or even decreases in speech recognition. A new measure of how well hearing-impaired listeners used information within specific frequency bands called "efficiency" was devised. This measure compared the benefit of providing a given increase in speech audibility to a hearing-impaired listener to the benefit observed in normal-hearing listeners for the same increase in speech audibility. Efficiencies were calculated using the old AI method and the new AI method (which takes into account the effects of high speech presentation levels). There was a clear pattern in the results suggesting that as the degree of hearing loss at a given frequency increased beyond 55 dB HL, the efficacy of providing additional audibility to that frequency region was diminished, especially when this degree of hearing loss was present at frequencies of 4000 Hz and above. A comparison of analyses from the "old" and "new" AI procedures suggests that some, but not all, of the deficiencies of speech recognition in these listeners was due to high presentation levels.
本研究是一项关于为听力受损听众提供可听高频语音信息益处的系统调查。五名听力正常的听众和九名高频听力受损的听众识别了在多个截止频率下进行低通滤波的无意义音节。作为量化每种情况下可听度的一种方法,为每位听众的每种情况计算清晰度指数(AI)。随着可听高频信息的增加,大多数听力受损听众的语音识别能力有所提高。在某些情况下,对于受损更严重的听众,增加高频语音信息的可听度并未导致语音识别能力进一步提高,甚至语音识别能力下降。设计了一种新的衡量听力受损听众在特定频段内使用信息情况的指标,称为“效率”。该指标将为听力受损听众提供给定语音可听度增加量的益处与听力正常听众在相同语音可听度增加量时观察到的益处进行比较。使用旧的AI方法和新的AI方法(考虑了高语音呈现水平的影响)计算效率。结果有一个明显的模式,表明当给定频率处的听力损失程度超过55 dB HL时,向该频率区域提供额外可听度的效果会减弱,尤其是当4000 Hz及以上频率存在这种听力损失程度时。对“旧”和“新”AI程序分析的比较表明,这些听众语音识别的一些但并非所有缺陷是由于高呈现水平导致的。