Yamamoto H, Sedgwick J B, Busse W W
Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53792, USA.
J Immunol. 1998 Jul 15;161(2):971-7.
In bronchial asthma, eosinophils (EOS) adhere to, and migrate across, the lung microvasculature to exert their effector functions in the airways. This study was conducted to determine the effect of cytokines on adhesion molecule expression on human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (HPMEC) and the influence of these molecules on EOS adhesion and transmigration in vitro. Unlike ICAM-1 expression (>80% positive cytokine-treated HPMEC by flow cytometry), VCAM-1 expression varied with the cytokine(s) pretreatment; the order of potency was: TNF-alpha + IL-4 (82.2 +/- 4.2% positive cells) > TNF-alpha (41.8 +/- 5.1%) > IL-1beta (20.8 +/- 4.7%). IL-4 alone had no effect on either ICAM-1 or VCAM-1 expression. EOS adhesion to cytokine-treated HPMEC followed the same order as that observed for VCAM-1 expression. Interestingly, EOS migration across cytokine-treated HPMEC varied inversely with VCAM-1 expression on, and EOS adhesion to, HPMEC; IL-1beta (21.2 +/- 1.4% migration) > TNF-alpha (12.6 +/- 2.6%) > TNF-alpha + IL-4 (9.1 +/- 2.0%). EOS adhesion was greatest with TNF-alpha + IL-4-treated HPMEC, was dependent on VCAM-1, and inhibited with anti-alpha4 integrin mAb (67.7 +/- 7.5% inhibition, p < 0.0005). In contrast, the highest EOS migration occurred across IL-1beta-treated HPMEC and was inhibited by anti-beta2 integrin mAb (40.4 +/- 2.5% inhibition, p < 0.005). Viable HPMEC were required for EOS migration but not adhesion. Our results suggest that EOS adhesion and transmigration are differentially regulated by VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 expression and the interaction of these adhesion proteins with their respective counterligands, i.e., alpha4 and beta2 integrins on EOS.
在支气管哮喘中,嗜酸性粒细胞(EOS)黏附于肺微血管并穿越肺微血管,以在气道中发挥其效应功能。本研究旨在确定细胞因子对人肺微血管内皮细胞(HPMEC)黏附分子表达的影响,以及这些分子对体外EOS黏附和迁移的影响。与细胞间黏附分子-1(ICAM-1)的表达不同(流式细胞术检测显示,>80%经细胞因子处理的HPMEC呈阳性),血管细胞黏附分子-1(VCAM-1)的表达随细胞因子预处理的不同而变化;效力顺序为:肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)+白细胞介素-4(IL-4)(82.2±4.2%阳性细胞)>TNF-α(41.8±5.1%)>白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)(20.8±4.7%)。单独的IL-4对ICAM-1或VCAM-1的表达均无影响。EOS对经细胞因子处理的HPMEC的黏附顺序与观察到的VCAM-1表达顺序相同。有趣的是,EOS穿越经细胞因子处理的HPMEC的迁移与HPMEC上的VCAM-1表达以及EOS对HPMEC的黏附呈负相关;IL-1β(21.2±1.4%迁移)>TNF-α(12.6±2.6%)>TNF-α+IL-4(9.1±2.0%)。EOS对经TNF-α+IL-4处理的HPMEC的黏附最强,依赖于VCAM-1,并且用抗α4整合素单克隆抗体可抑制(抑制率为67.7±7.5%,p<0.0005)。相反,最高的EOS迁移发生在经IL-1β处理的HPMEC上,并且用抗β2整合素单克隆抗体可抑制(抑制率为40.4±2.5%,p<0.005)。EOS迁移需要有活力的HPMEC,但黏附则不需要。我们的结果表明,EOS的黏附和迁移受VCAM-1和ICAM-1表达以及这些黏附蛋白与其各自配体(即EOS上的α4和β2整合素)相互作用的差异调节。