• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经桡动脉冠状动脉造影——经验、并发症及局限性

Coronary angiography from the radial artery--experience, complications and limitations.

作者信息

Hildick-Smith D J, Lowe M D, Walsh J T, Ludman P F, Stephens N G, Schofield P M, Stone D L, Shapiro L M, Petch M C

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Papworth Hospital, Cambridgeshire, UK.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 1998 May 15;64(3):231-9. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5273(98)00074-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0167-5273(98)00074-6
PMID:9672402
Abstract

AIMS

to assess the outcomes, complications and limitations of coronary angiography performed via percutaneous radial artery puncture.

METHODS AND RESULTS

two hundred and fifty patients underwent diagnostic coronary angiography from the radial artery, 182 (72.8%) of whom had contraindications to the femoral approach, for example due to peripheral vascular disease (n=85), therapeutic anticoagulation (29), or failed femoral approach (17). Procedural success in this high-risk population was achieved in 231 patients (92.4%). Principle reasons for failure were unsuccessful radial access (5) and arterial spasm (5). Procedure duration (SD) for an operator's first 20 cases compared with cases thereafter (min) was 47.7 (16.7) vs. 41.5 (14.6), P=0.0004; fluoroscopy time (min) 9.7 (7.1) vs. 6.6 (5.1), P=0.0001 and procedural success 89.6% vs. 94.1%, P=ns. Complications included two deaths associated temporally with catheterisation, three cases of arterial dissection without ischaemic sequelae and one transient ischaemic attack.

CONCLUSIONS

coronary angiography can be performed successfully from the radial artery, but this approach has limitations, which include the need to demonstrate dual palmar vascular supply, the prolonged learning phase, the procedural failure rate, patient discomfort and a demonstrable incidence of vascular and haemodynamic complications. We believe that radial coronary angiography should only be undertaken when there is a contraindication to the femoral approach.

摘要

目的

评估经皮桡动脉穿刺冠状动脉造影的结果、并发症及局限性。

方法与结果

250例患者接受了经桡动脉的诊断性冠状动脉造影,其中182例(72.8%)因股动脉途径存在禁忌证,例如外周血管疾病(n = 85)、治疗性抗凝(29例)或股动脉穿刺失败(17例)。该高危人群中231例(92.4%)手术成功。失败的主要原因是桡动脉穿刺不成功(5例)和动脉痉挛(5例)。操作者前20例手术的操作时间(标准差)与之后的病例相比(分钟)为47.7(16.7)对41.5(14.6),P = 0.0004;透视时间(分钟)9.7(7.1)对6.6(5.1),P = 0.0001,手术成功率89.6%对94.1%,P =无显著差异。并发症包括2例与导管插入术时间相关的死亡、3例无缺血性后遗症的动脉夹层和1例短暂性脑缺血发作。

结论

经桡动脉可成功进行冠状动脉造影,但该方法存在局限性,包括需要证实双掌侧血管供应、学习阶段延长、手术失败率、患者不适以及血管和血流动力学并发症的明显发生率。我们认为,仅在股动脉途径存在禁忌证时才应进行桡动脉冠状动脉造影。

相似文献

1
Coronary angiography from the radial artery--experience, complications and limitations.经桡动脉冠状动脉造影——经验、并发症及局限性
Int J Cardiol. 1998 May 15;64(3):231-9. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5273(98)00074-6.
2
Transradial coronary angiography in patients with contraindications to the femoral approach: an analysis of 500 cases.股动脉入路禁忌患者的桡动脉冠状动脉造影:500例分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004 Jan;61(1):60-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10708.
3
Rapid cycle change to predominantly radial access coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: effect on vascular access site complications.快速循环改变为主要的经桡动脉入路冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:对血管入路部位并发症的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Mar 1;79(4):589-94. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23120. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
4
Comparison of transradial coronary procedures via right radial versus left radial artery approach: A meta-analysis.经右侧桡动脉与左侧桡动脉途径进行桡动脉冠状动脉介入手术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec;88(7):1027-1033. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26519. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
5
Coronary angiography in the presence of peripheral vascular disease: femoral or brachial/radial approach?外周血管疾病患者的冠状动脉造影:股动脉途径还是肱动脉/桡动脉途径?
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000 Jan;49(1):32-7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(200001)49:1<32::aid-ccd6>3.0.co;2-#.
6
Occasional-operator percutaneous brachial coronary angiography: first, do no arm.临时操作者经皮肱动脉冠状动脉造影术:首先,不要伤害手臂。 (注:原文表述似乎不太符合常见医学文献规范,翻译可能存在一定局限性,推测其大致意思如此)
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002 Oct;57(2):161-5; discussion 166. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10329.
7
Safety of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the radial versus femoral route in patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with warfarin.在接受华法林持续口服抗凝治疗的患者中,经桡动脉与股动脉途径进行冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性。
Am Heart J. 2014 Oct;168(4):537-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.06.016. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
8
A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention).经桡动脉与股动脉入路行冠状动脉旁路移植血管造影和介入治疗的随机对比:RADIAL-CABG 试验(经桡动脉与股动脉入路行冠状动脉旁路移植血管造影和介入治疗的比较)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1138-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
9
[Coronary angiography by a radial artery approach: feasibility, learning curve. One operator's experience].[经桡动脉途径冠状动脉造影:可行性、学习曲线。一位操作者的经验]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1998 Feb;91(2):209-15.
10
Influence of radial versus femoral access site on coronary angiography and intervention outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.桡动脉与股动脉穿刺部位对冠状动脉造影及介入治疗结果的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 1;90(7):1093-1104. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27043. Epub 2017 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography: Technological Innovations and Clinical Implications in Cardiology.冠状动脉内光学相干断层扫描:心脏病学中的技术创新与临床意义
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2025;27(1):44. doi: 10.1007/s11936-025-01103-4. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
2
Predictive value of CHA2DS2-VASc score in radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary angiography.CHA2DS2-VASc评分对经桡动脉冠状动脉造影术后桡动脉闭塞的预测价值。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 12;10:1157087. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1157087. eCollection 2023.
3
Comparison of spasmolytic regimen for prevention of radial artery spasm during the distal radial approach: A single-center, randomized study.
桡动脉远端入路时预防桡动脉痉挛的解痉方案比较:一项单中心随机研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 1;10:1007147. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1007147. eCollection 2023.
4
Improvising Wet-Cupping Therapy for the Management of Severe Forearm Hematoma Following Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Geriatric Patient.老年患者经桡动脉冠状动脉介入术后严重前臂血肿的湿拔罐疗法改良应用
Anatol J Cardiol. 2022 Sep;26(9):737-739. doi: 10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2022.1892.
5
Forearm hematoma as a complication of transradial coronary intervention: an Indian single-center experience.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗并发症之前臂血肿:一项印度单中心经验
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Aug 15;11(4):462-470. eCollection 2021.
6
Radial Access for Coronary Angiography Carries Fewer Complications Compared with Femoral Access: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.与股动脉入路相比,桡动脉入路进行冠状动脉造影的并发症更少:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Clin Med. 2021 May 17;10(10):2163. doi: 10.3390/jcm10102163.
7
Transradial versus transfemoral access for cardiac catheterization: a nationwide pilot study of training preferences and expertise in The United States.经桡动脉与经股动脉入路行心导管术:美国一项关于培训偏好和专长的全国性试点研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 May 21;21(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02068-5.
8
TransRadial versus transUlnar artery approach for elective invasive percutaneous coronary interventions: a randomized trial on the feasibility and safety with ultrasonographic outcome - RAUL study.经桡动脉与经尺动脉途径用于择期侵入性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项关于超声检查结果的可行性和安全性的随机试验——RAUL研究
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2020 Dec;16(4):376-383. doi: 10.5114/aic.2020.101761. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
9
A Dynamic Systems Approach for Detecting and Localizing of Infarct-Related Artery in Acute Myocardial Infarction Using Compressed Paper-Based Electrocardiogram (ECG).基于压缩纸质心电图的急性心肌梗死中梗死相关动脉检测与定位的动态系统方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jul 17;20(14):3975. doi: 10.3390/s20143975.
10
Transradial approach for endovascular diagnosis and treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: A descriptive study.经桡动脉途径用于破裂脑动脉瘤的血管内诊断与治疗:一项描述性研究。
Surg Neurol Int. 2019 May 10;10:87. doi: 10.25259/SNI-44-2019. eCollection 2019.