Suppr超能文献

[院外心脏骤停:梅斯特雷急救服务的经验]

[Extrahospital cardiac arrest: the experience of Mestre Emergency Service].

作者信息

D'Este F, Busetto L, Russo G, Bonanome A, D'Este D

机构信息

Servizio di Urgenza ed Emergenza Medica, Mestre, VE.

出版信息

G Ital Cardiol. 1998 Jun;28(6):678-86.

PMID:9672781
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (AC) is one of the leading causes of death in industrialized countries. AC-related mortality can be reduced by rapid intervention. We report the experience of the emergency medical service (EMS) of Mestre on the management of out-of-hospital AC.

METHODS

We analyzed 80 cases of out-of-hospital AC observed consecutively by the EMS of Mestre from February 1996 to September 1997: 72 cases (90.0%) involved cardiac etiology and 8 (10.0%) non-cardiac etiology. The 72 cases involving cardiac etiology were divided in three groups: group A) 12 unwitnessed ACs (16.7%); group B) 12 ACs witnessed by EMS personnel (16.7%); group C) 48 bystander-witnessed ACs (66.6%).

RESULTS

In group A, in which 4/12 patients (33.3%) presented ventricular fibrillation (FV) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (TV) as initial rhythm, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was obtained in one patient with FV and in one patient with asystole. In group B, 7/12 patients (58.3%) presented FV or TV as initial rhythm; in this subgroup, ROSC was obtained in 71.4% of cases (4 cases with FV and one case with TV) and discharge in 42.9%, while in the subgroup with other rhythms the rate of ROSC was 40.0% (two patients with pulseless electrical activity later died). In group C, 35/48 patients (72.9%) presented VF or TV as initial rhythm; in this subgroup, ROSC was achieved in 42.9% of cases (13 cases with FV and 2 cases with TV) and discharge in 14.3%, while in the subgroup of bystander-witnessed AC with other rhythms the rate of ROSC was extremely low (7.7%) (one patient with asystole later discharged). In group C, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed in 20/48 patients (40.1%). In these patients, FV or TV were more frequently recorded as initial rhythm (80.0 vs 67.9%; p < 0.05). In patients without bystander CPR, the interval between the time of collapse and the time of the first defibrillation was shorter in the patients who were admitted than in patients who died (6.0 +/- 1.4 vs 10.9 +/- 4.4 min; p < 0.05). Considering all patients with FV or TV as initial rhythm and the interval between the collapse and the first defibrillation exactly recorded, the percentage of ROSC decreased when the interval between the collapse and the first defibrillation increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm that early defibrillation is the key factor in the prognosis of out-of-hospital AC. The data suggest that the immediate delivery of bystander CPR could extend the interval in which defibrillation is effective.

摘要

背景

院外心脏骤停(AC)是工业化国家主要的死亡原因之一。通过快速干预可降低与AC相关的死亡率。我们报告了梅斯特雷紧急医疗服务(EMS)在院外AC管理方面的经验。

方法

我们分析了1996年2月至1997年9月梅斯特雷EMS连续观察的80例院外AC病例:72例(90.0%)为心脏病因,8例(10.0%)为非心脏病因。72例涉及心脏病因的病例分为三组:A组)12例未被目击的AC(16.7%);B组)12例由EMS人员目击的AC(16.7%);C组)48例由旁观者目击的AC(66.6%)。

结果

在A组中,4/12例患者(33.3%)初始心律为心室颤动(FV)或无脉性室性心动过速(TV),1例FV患者和1例心脏停搏患者实现了自主循环恢复(ROSC)。在B组中,7/12例患者(58.3%)初始心律为FV或TV;在该亚组中,71.4%的病例实现了ROSC(4例FV和1例TV),42.9%出院,而在其他心律亚组中ROSC率为40.0%(2例无脉性电活动患者后来死亡)。在C组中,35/48例患者(72.9%)初始心律为VF或TV;在该亚组中,42.9%的病例实现了ROSC(13例FV和2例TV),14.3%出院,而在旁观者目击的AC且为其他心律的亚组中ROSC率极低(7.7%)(1例心脏停搏患者后来出院)。在C组中,20/48例患者(40.1%)接受了旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)。在这些患者中,FV或TV作为初始心律的记录更为频繁(80.0%对67.9%;p<0.05)。在未接受旁观者CPR的患者中,入院患者从倒地到首次除颤的间隔时间比死亡患者短(6.0±1.4对10.9±4.4分钟;p<0.05)。考虑所有初始心律为FV或TV且倒地与首次除颤间隔时间准确记录的患者,随着倒地与首次除颤间隔时间增加,ROSC百分比下降。

结论

我们的数据证实早期除颤是院外AC预后的关键因素。数据表明旁观者立即进行心肺复苏可延长除颤有效的时间间隔。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验