Brown P, van der Hart O
Pierre Janet Centre, Kew, Victoria, Australia.
Psychol Rep. 1998 Jun;82(3 Pt 1):1027-43. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1998.82.3.1027.
Since the late nineteenth century explanations of sexual trauma have invoked unconscious mental mechanisms of forgetting. Memories have been seen as submerged only to be therapeutically recovered. Explanations and related therapies have tended to be either hotly advocated or decried, not the least were those of Janet and Freud. Once again there is a vigorous debate surrounding the status of recovered memories. This paper was undertaken to contribute to reasoned and balanced dialogue by exploring an historical dimension. There is a renaissance of interest in the oeuvre of Janet. In this article Janetian sources are examined in which he criticised Freud's views on sexual trauma and elaborated his own position, a position which is yet significant today.
自19世纪末以来,对性创伤的解释一直援引遗忘的无意识心理机制。记忆被视为被淹没,只有通过治疗才能恢复。这些解释和相关疗法往往要么受到热烈拥护,要么遭到谴责,珍妮特和弗洛伊德的理论尤其如此。围绕恢复记忆的地位再次展开了激烈辩论。本文旨在通过探索一个历史维度,为理性和平衡的对话做出贡献。人们对珍妮特的作品重新产生了兴趣。在本文中,将审视珍妮特的相关资料,其中他批评了弗洛伊德关于性创伤的观点,并阐述了自己的立场,这一立场在今天仍然具有重要意义。