Dobrin P B, Mirande R, Kang S, Dong Q S, Mrkvicka R
Department of Surgery, University of Utah Medical School and Veterans Affairs Hospital, Salt Lake City 84148, USA.
Ann Vasc Surg. 1998 Jul;12(4):317-23. doi: 10.1007/s100169900161.
On some occasions vascular surgeons are called upon to construct an end-to-end anastomosis using prosthetic graft material. If a spatulated anastomosis is not fashioned, three important variables that are under the surgeon's control could affect anastomotic dimensions: (1) selection of graft material, (2) graft size relative to the native vessel, and (3) suture technique. Accordingly, studies were performed on 36 nonspatulated, end-to-end artery-to-polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts to evaluate the effects of graft size and suture technique on anastomotic dimensions. Size-matched (3 mm) and slightly oversized (4 mm) grafts were anastomosed end-to-end to 3 mm pig carotid arteries using (1) running polypropylene (Surgilene) sutures, (2) running polybutester (Novafil) sutures, or (3) interrupted sutures. After 30 min the vessels were excised, filled with contrast material, and radiographs were obtained to measure anastomotic dimensions. Results showed that, at every comparable pressure, 4 mm grafts produced larger anastomoses than did 3 mm grafts. In addition 4 mm grafts produced smoother anastomoses without a constricted or "pinched" appearance at the graft-artery junction. Marked compliance mismatch was observed with both sized grafts. There was no significant difference in the dimensions of the anastomoses or compliance mismatch with the three different suture techniques. These studies indicate that, when using PTFE grafts for end-to-end anastomoses, a graft that is slightly larger than the artery is preferable to provide the largest and smoothest anastomosis, and that any of the three suture techniques may be used.
在某些情况下,血管外科医生需要使用人工血管材料进行端端吻合。如果没有制作成斜面吻合,外科医生能够控制的三个重要变量可能会影响吻合口尺寸:(1)人工血管材料的选择;(2)人工血管与天然血管相比的尺寸;(3)缝合技术。因此,对36个非斜面端端动脉-聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)人工血管进行了研究,以评估人工血管尺寸和缝合技术对吻合口尺寸的影响。将尺寸匹配(3毫米)和略大(4毫米)的人工血管与3毫米猪颈动脉进行端端吻合,使用(1)连续聚丙烯(Surgilene)缝线、(2)连续聚丁酯(Novafil)缝线或(3)间断缝线。30分钟后,切除血管,注入造影剂,并拍摄X光片以测量吻合口尺寸。结果显示,在每个可比压力下,4毫米的人工血管产生的吻合口比3毫米的人工血管更大。此外,4毫米的人工血管产生的吻合口更平滑,在人工血管与动脉的交界处没有狭窄或“挤压”的外观。两种尺寸的人工血管均观察到明显的顺应性不匹配。三种不同缝合技术在吻合口尺寸或顺应性不匹配方面没有显著差异。这些研究表明,当使用PTFE人工血管进行端端吻合时,略大于动脉的人工血管更可取,以提供最大且最平滑的吻合口,并且三种缝合技术中的任何一种都可以使用。