Heller P E, Wood B
Bryn Mawr College, USA.
J Marital Fam Ther. 1998 Jul;24(3):273-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1998.tb01085.x.
This study examined gender and three aspects of marital intimacy using a method to establish both objective and subjective indices of intimacy. Fifty couples answered the Personal Assessment of Intimate Relationships (Schaefer & Olson, 1981) twice: once as a self-report and once to respond as they predicted their spouses would answer. Couples who were less accurate in predicting each other's responses also diverged in their experience of intimacy and reported lower intimacy. Results suggest that high intimacy is based on both understanding and similarity of intimate experience. Women reported significantly higher levels of intimacy and were also better than men in predicting their partners' feelings. These findings suggest that women may be more attuned to intimacy or that definitions and assessment of intimacy are gender biased or both.
本研究采用一种建立亲密关系客观和主观指标的方法,考察了性别与婚姻亲密关系的三个方面。五十对夫妻两次回答了《亲密关系个人评估》(谢弗和奥尔森,1981年):一次是自我报告,一次是预测其配偶的回答方式来作答。在预测对方回答时不太准确的夫妻,其亲密体验也存在差异,且报告的亲密程度较低。结果表明,高度的亲密关系基于亲密体验的理解和相似性。女性报告的亲密程度显著更高,在预测伴侣感受方面也比男性更出色。这些发现表明,女性可能对亲密关系更敏感,或者亲密关系的定义和评估存在性别偏见,或者两者皆有。