Huijing P A
Instituut voor Fundamentele en Klinische Bewegingswetenschappen, Faculteit Bewegingswetenschappen, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1998 Apr;8(2):61-77. doi: 10.1016/s1050-6411(97)00023-0.
The purpose of this paper is to review exemplary aspects of different views of skeletal muscle characteristics. A classical view of muscle characteristics plays a very important role in modelling of muscles and movement. However, it often also pervades concepts on which our understanding of muscle function is based. In this view length effects, velocity effects and effects of degrees of activation and recruitment are distinguished and, often implicitly, assumed to be independent effects. It will be illustrated that using the classical approach many valuable things may be learned about muscle function and adaptation. At the same time we should realize that such a classical approach is too limited for use in generating knowledge about properties of muscles during daily use. The use of scaling of force to estimate muscular properties during submaximal activity on the basis of properties during maximal activation is shown to be very inadequate. An alternative view is described and particular examples are provided of changes in length-force characteristics as a consequence of submaximal activation, previous length change, as well as the effect of short-term histories of these variables. In addition, effects of inhomogeneities of muscle in morphology as well as physiological properties are considered. It is concluded that length-velocity-force characteristics are not unique properties of a muscle, and that these characteristics are not only strongly influenced by actual effects of recruitment, firing frequency, shortening performed and actual velocity of shortening but also by the short time history of these factors. Therefore, length, velocity and activation cannot be considered as independent determinants of muscle functioning. It is also shown that we are confronted with many indications of physiological individuality regarding these phenomena.
本文旨在回顾骨骼肌特性不同观点的典型方面。肌肉特性的经典观点在肌肉和运动建模中起着非常重要的作用。然而,它也常常渗透到我们对肌肉功能理解所基于的概念中。在这种观点中,区分了长度效应、速度效应以及激活和募集程度的效应,并且通常隐含地假定这些效应是相互独立的。将说明使用经典方法可以了解到许多关于肌肉功能和适应性的有价值的信息。同时我们应该认识到,这种经典方法对于生成关于日常使用中肌肉特性的知识来说过于有限。基于最大激活时的特性来使用力的缩放以估计次最大活动期间的肌肉特性,结果证明是非常不充分的。本文描述了一种替代观点,并提供了具体例子,说明次最大激活、先前的长度变化以及这些变量的短期历史所导致的长度 - 力特性的变化。此外,还考虑了肌肉在形态学以及生理特性方面的不均匀性影响。得出的结论是,长度 - 速度 - 力特性不是肌肉的唯一特性,并且这些特性不仅受到募集、发放频率、执行的缩短以及实际缩短速度的实际影响的强烈影响,还受到这些因素的短期历史的影响。因此,长度、速度和激活不能被视为肌肉功能的独立决定因素。还表明,在这些现象方面,我们面临着许多生理个体差异的迹象。