Suppr超能文献

培哚普利与依那普利在糖尿病高血压大鼠中的肾脏保护差异并不反映肾小球血管紧张素转换酶活性。

Renoprotective differences between perindopril and enalapril in the diabetic hypertensive rat do not reflect glomerular angiotensin-converting enzyme activity.

作者信息

Duggan K A, Hodge G, Makarious M M, Charlesworth J A

机构信息

Hypertension Laboratory, Liverpool Hospital, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Sci (Lond). 1998 May;94(5):511-6. doi: 10.1042/cs0940511.

Abstract
  1. The various angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have structural differences which affect their affinities for the catalytic sites on converting enzyme. We postulated that such differences might result in differences in renoprotective efficacy. We investigated this in the diabetic spontaneous hypertensive rat. We also investigated whether these differences might reflect variations in glomerular or plasma angiotensin-converting enzyme activity. 2. One week after induction of diabetes, rats were started on antihypertensive therapy: enalapril, 10 mg.day-1.kg-1, or perindopril, 4 mg.day-1.kg-1, in the drinking water. After 3 months, the rats were killed, blood samples were taken and tissues were harvested. Angiotensin-converting enzyme activity in isolated glomeruli and plasma was measured by fluorimetric assay. Glomerular protein content was also determined. 3. Urinary protein excretion was significantly lower in perindopril-treated rats than in either controls (P < 0.0005) or enalapril-treated rats (P < 0.05). Glomerular protein content was also lower in perindopril-treated rats (P < 0.05 versus enalapril; P < 0.005 versus control). There was no difference in glomerular angiotensin-converting enzyme activity between the two inhibitors although both were lower than control values (enalapril P < 0.025; perindopril P < 0.025). Plasma angiotensin-converting enzyme activity was significantly lower in the perindopril group than in either control (P < 0.005) or the enalapril group (P < 0.01). 4. We conclude that in the spontaneous hypertensive rat with streptozotocin-induced diabetes, perindopril is more effective than enalapril in reducing proteinuria and glomerular protein accumulation. This difference does not result from differences in glomerular-converting enzyme activity.
摘要
  1. 各种血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂存在结构差异,这些差异会影响它们对转换酶催化位点的亲和力。我们推测这种差异可能导致肾脏保护功效的不同。我们在糖尿病自发性高血压大鼠中对此进行了研究。我们还研究了这些差异是否可能反映肾小球或血浆中血管紧张素转换酶活性的变化。2. 糖尿病诱导一周后,大鼠开始接受抗高血压治疗:饮用水中加入依那普利,剂量为10毫克·天⁻¹·千克⁻¹,或培哚普利,剂量为4毫克·天⁻¹·千克⁻¹。3个月后,处死大鼠,采集血样并收获组织。通过荧光测定法测量分离出的肾小球和血浆中的血管紧张素转换酶活性。还测定了肾小球蛋白含量。3. 培哚普利治疗的大鼠尿蛋白排泄量显著低于对照组(P < 0.0005)和依那普利治疗的大鼠(P < 0.05)。培哚普利治疗的大鼠肾小球蛋白含量也较低(与依那普利相比,P < 0.05;与对照组相比,P < 0.005)。两种抑制剂之间肾小球血管紧张素转换酶活性没有差异,尽管两者均低于对照值(依那普利P < 0.025;培哚普利P < 0.025)。培哚普利组的血浆血管紧张素转换酶活性显著低于对照组(P < 生0.005)或依那普利组(P < 0.01)。结论:在链脲佐菌素诱导糖尿病的自发性高血压大鼠中,培哚普利在降低蛋白尿和肾小球蛋白积累方面比依那普利更有效。这种差异并非由肾小球转换酶活性的差异所致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验