• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规放疗和超分割放疗后的肿瘤反应、黏膜反应及晚期效应。

Tumor response, mucosal reactions and late effects after conventional and hyperfractionated radiotherapy.

作者信息

Bernier J, Thames H D, Smith C D, Horiot J C

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 1998 May;47(2):137-43. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(97)00221-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0167-8140(97)00221-1
PMID:9683360
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Relationships between normal tissue reactions and tumor response to radiotherapy have generally been investigated in retrospective studies, with the attendant difficulties such as different times of treatment and lack of standard scales for scoring of normal tissue reactions. This study analyses the correlation between normal tissue reactions and tumor response in a randomized trial of hyperfractionation versus conventional radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

EORTC trial 22791, which accrued 325 T2-3, N0-1 and M0 oropharynx squamous cell carcinomas, compared conventional radiotherapy (70 Gy in 7 weeks) to a hyperfractionated regime (two daily irradiations of 1.15 Gy up to 80.5 Gy in 7 weeks). Acute and late toxicities were assessed according to the RTOG/EORTC scales. The variables were tumor regression at treatment completion, tumor control for unlimited follow-up, severity of acute mucosal reactions (grade of the peak reaction, time to onset of grade 2 mucositis, or duration of acute reactions of grade 3) and severity of late effects in normal tissues (late ulceration, cervical edema secondary to lymphatic drainage damage, late muscular fibrosis, or late mucosal necrosis as consequential damage). Kendall's rank correlation was used to assess the levels of significance of the correlation. The 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated for each correlation tau-b coefficient.

RESULTS

Irradiation doses and overall treatment times were consistent between the treatment arms. The time to onset of patchy mucosal reactions was inversely correlated to tumor regression at treatment completion in the hyperfractionated arm (arm 2) but not in the conventional fractionation arm (arm 1). The other significant correlations were restricted to the following pairs of end-points and patient subgroups: acute mucositis of grade 3 versus tumor regression at the end of treatment in arm 2 for T2 tumors, late ulceration versus tumor control in arm 2 and acute mucosal reactions versus late effects in normal tissues in arm 2 for T3 tumors. By and large, the 95% CIs for Kendall's tau-b included zero and did not include 0.5, an indication that the comparison had sufficient power to detect a difference, if indeed one existed.

CONCLUSIONS

These results do not represent clinical evidence strong enough to demonstrate that individual differences in sensitivity influence the response of tumors to radiation.

摘要

背景

正常组织反应与肿瘤放疗反应之间的关系通常是在回顾性研究中进行调查的,存在诸如治疗时间不同以及缺乏正常组织反应评分标准尺度等伴随困难。本研究在超分割放疗与传统放疗的随机试验中分析了正常组织反应与肿瘤反应之间的相关性。

材料与方法

欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)试验22791纳入了325例T2 - 3、N0 - 1和M0的口咽鳞状细胞癌患者,将传统放疗(7周内给予70 Gy)与超分割方案(7周内每天两次照射,每次1.15 Gy,总计80.5 Gy)进行比较。根据美国放射肿瘤学协作组(RTOG)/欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)标准评估急性和晚期毒性。变量包括治疗结束时的肿瘤退缩情况、无限期随访的肿瘤控制情况、急性黏膜反应的严重程度(峰值反应分级、2级黏膜炎的发生时间或3级急性反应的持续时间)以及正常组织晚期效应的严重程度(晚期溃疡、继发于淋巴引流损伤的颈部水肿、晚期肌肉纤维化或作为继发损伤的晚期黏膜坏死)。采用肯德尔等级相关性来评估相关性的显著水平。为每个相关性tau - b系数计算95%置信区间(95% CI)。

结果

各治疗组之间的照射剂量和总治疗时间一致。在超分割组(第2组)中,斑片状黏膜反应的发生时间与治疗结束时的肿瘤退缩呈负相关,但在传统分割组(第1组)中并非如此。其他显著相关性仅限于以下终点和患者亚组对:第2组中T2肿瘤在治疗结束时3级急性黏膜炎与肿瘤退缩、第2组中晚期溃疡与肿瘤控制以及第2组中T3肿瘤的急性黏膜反应与正常组织晚期效应。总体而言,肯德尔tau - b的95% CI包含零且不包含0.5,这表明该比较有足够的检验效能来检测差异(如果确实存在差异的话)。

结论

这些结果并不代表有足够强的临床证据来证明敏感性的个体差异会影响肿瘤对放疗的反应。

相似文献

1
Tumor response, mucosal reactions and late effects after conventional and hyperfractionated radiotherapy.常规放疗和超分割放疗后的肿瘤反应、黏膜反应及晚期效应。
Radiother Oncol. 1998 May;47(2):137-43. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(97)00221-1.
2
Do acute mucosal reactions lead to consequential late reactions in patients with head and neck cancer?头颈部癌患者的急性黏膜反应会导致继发性迟发性反应吗?
Radiother Oncol. 1999 Aug;52(2):157-64. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(99)00107-3.
3
Prospective randomized trial comparing hyperfractionated versus conventional radiotherapy in stages III and IV oropharyngeal carcinoma.比较超分割放疗与传统放疗用于Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期口咽癌的前瞻性随机试验。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991 Aug;21(3):557-62. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90670-y.
4
Comparison between normal tissue reactions and local tumor control in head and neck cancer patients treated by definitive radiotherapy.接受根治性放疗的头颈癌患者正常组织反应与局部肿瘤控制的比较。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Jun 1;35(3):455-62. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)80006-x.
5
Radiotherapy-related early morbidity in head and neck cancer: quantitative clinical radiobiology as deduced from the CHART trial.头颈部癌放疗相关早期并发症:从CHART试验推导的定量临床放射生物学
Radiother Oncol. 2001 Aug;60(2):123-35. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(01)00358-9.
6
Locoregionally advanced carcinoma of the oropharynx: conventional radiotherapy vs. accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy vs. concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy--a multicenter randomized trial.口咽局部晚期癌:传统放疗与加速超分割放疗及同步放化疗的多中心随机试验
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Jan 1;55(1):78-92. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03792-6.
7
Comparison of conventional fractionation (five fractions per week) and altered fractionation (six fractions per week) in stage I and II squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx: An institutional study.口咽I期和II期鳞状细胞癌中传统分割放疗(每周五次分割)与改变分割放疗(每周六次分割)的比较:一项机构研究
Indian J Cancer. 2017 Jan-Mar;54(1):6-10. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_144_17.
8
Randomized phase I/II trial of two variants of accelerated fractionated radiotherapy regimens for advanced head and neck cancer: results of RTOG 88-09.晚期头颈癌加速分割放疗方案两种变体的随机I/II期试验:RTOG 88-09的结果
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Jun 15;32(3):589-97. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00078-D.
9
Altered and conventional fractionated radiotherapy in locoregional control and survival of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx.改变分割放疗与传统分割放疗对喉、口咽和下咽鳞状细胞癌患者局部区域控制及生存的影响
Croat Med J. 2006 Feb;47(1):42-52.
10
Acute mucosal radiation reactions in patients with head and neck cancer. Patterns of mucosal healing on the basis of daily examinations.头颈部癌症患者的急性黏膜放射性反应。基于日常检查的黏膜愈合模式。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2012 Aug;188(8):686-91. doi: 10.1007/s00066-012-0146-8. Epub 2012 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Among 45 variants in 11 genes, HDM2 promoter polymorphisms emerge as new candidate biomarker associated with radiation toxicity.在11个基因中的45个变异中,HDM2启动子多态性成为与放射毒性相关的新候选生物标志物。
3 Biotech. 2014 Apr;4(2):137-148. doi: 10.1007/s13205-013-0135-3. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
2
An approach to identify, from DCE MRI, significant subvolumes of tumors related to outcomes in advanced head-and-neck cancer.一种从动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE MRI)中识别与晚期头颈癌预后相关的肿瘤重要亚体积的方法。
Med Phys. 2012 Aug;39(8):5277-85. doi: 10.1118/1.4737022.
3
Tobacco use in human papillomavirus-positive advanced oropharynx cancer patients related to increased risk of distant metastases and tumor recurrence.
人乳头瘤病毒阳性的晚期口咽癌患者吸烟与远处转移和肿瘤复发风险增加相关。
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Feb 15;16(4):1226-35. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2350. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
4
Twenty-five years experience with laser surgery for head and neck tumors : report of an international symposium, Göttingen, Germany, 2005.头颈部肿瘤激光手术25年经验:2005年德国哥廷根国际研讨会报告
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Jun;264(6):577-85. doi: 10.1007/s00405-007-0280-6. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
5
In vitro radiosensitivity of tumour cells and fibroblasts derived from head and neck carcinomas: mutual relationship and correlation with clinical data.头颈部癌来源的肿瘤细胞和成纤维细胞的体外放射敏感性:相互关系及与临床数据的相关性
Br J Cancer. 1999 Mar;79(7-8):1074-84. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690172.
6
[Genetic predisposition and radiation sensitivity of tumors].[肿瘤的遗传易感性与辐射敏感性]
Strahlenther Onkol. 1997 Sep;173(9):469-79. doi: 10.1007/BF03038186.