McIntyre P, Forrest J, Heath T, Burgess M, Harvey B
National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, Westmead, New South Wales.
Commun Dis Intell. 1998 Jul 9;22(7):125-32. doi: 10.33321/cdi.1998.22.27.
In August 1997, a workshop was convened by the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Diseases to consider current issues in the use of pertussis vaccines and implications for the Australian immunisation schedule. Topics covered included the history, efficacy and reactogenicity of whole-cell and acellular vaccines and vaccine schedules. Acellular pertussis vaccine is preferred by the National Health and Medical Research Council for the primary course as well as the 18 month and 4-5 year old childhood doses. At the time of the workshop, a 3-component acellular vaccine (DTPa) had been approved (licensed) in Australia for all doses in the childhood schedule. It was the first vaccine subject to a cost-effectiveness evaluation under the new vaccine funding arrangements. Issues considered in the evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of the vaccine were discussed. These included comparative efficacy, adverse events and compliance, and the question of community as well as individual benefit from the use of the vaccine.
1997年8月,国家疫苗可预防疾病免疫研究与监测中心召开了一次研讨会,以探讨百日咳疫苗使用中的当前问题及其对澳大利亚免疫接种计划的影响。涵盖的主题包括全细胞疫苗和无细胞疫苗的历史、效力和反应原性以及疫苗接种计划。国家卫生与医学研究委员会更倾向于使用无细胞百日咳疫苗进行基础免疫接种以及18个月和4至5岁儿童剂量的接种。在举办研讨会时,一种三组分无细胞疫苗(白喉破伤风无细胞百日咳联合疫苗)已在澳大利亚获得批准(许可)用于儿童免疫接种计划中的所有剂量。它是在新的疫苗资助安排下首个接受成本效益评估的疫苗。讨论了疫苗成本效益评估中考虑的问题。这些问题包括比较效力、不良事件和依从性,以及使用该疫苗对社区和个人的益处问题。