A bitter pill to swallow: placebo therapy in general practice.

Suppr

超能文献

作者信息

Comaroff J

出版信息

Sociol Rev. 1976 Feb;24(1):79-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954x.1976.tb00574.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-954x.1976.tb00574.x

PMID:968515

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

A bitter pill to swallow: placebo therapy in general practice.

Sociol Rev. 1976 Feb;24(1):79-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954x.1976.tb00574.x.

[Placebos in current medical practice].[当前医学实践中的安慰剂]

Rev Prat. 1980 Feb 1;30(7):325-9.

[The nameless pill. The effects and side-effects of the therapeutic use of placebo preparations].[无名药丸。安慰剂制剂治疗用途的效果与副作用]

Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1981 Aug 22;111(34):1222-32.

[THE GENERAL PRACTITIONER AND PLACEBOS].[全科医生与安慰剂]

Geneeskd Gids. 1963 Dec 12;41:515-9.

Placebo effects without placebos? More reason to abandon the paradoxical placebo.没有安慰剂的安慰剂效应？更有理由摒弃自相矛盾的安慰剂了。

Am J Bioeth. 2009 Dec;9(12):50-2. doi: 10.1080/15265160903234151.

Placebo therapy and the law: prescribe with care.安慰剂疗法与法律：谨慎开方。

Am J Law Med. 1983 Winter;8(4):371-405.

[The permissibility of placebos in clinical practice].[临床实践中安慰剂的可接受性]

Psychiatr Prax. 2009 Nov;36(8):359-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1223375. Epub 2009 Nov 13.

The patient's perspective of placebo use in daily practice: a qualitative study.患者视角下日常实践中安慰剂的使用：一项定性研究。

Swiss Med Wkly. 2014 Feb 13;144:w13899. doi: 10.4414/smw.2014.13899.

[Ethical and legal aspects of the use of placebos in research and practice].[研究与实践中使用安慰剂的伦理与法律问题]

Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1990 May;58(5):167-74. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1001180.

Placebo.

R I Med. 1992 Dec;75(12):557-8.

引用本文的文献

How German general practitioners justify their provision of complementary and alternative medicine - a qualitative study.德国全科医生为提供补充和替代医学辩护的原因——一项定性研究。

BMC Complement Med Ther. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12906-020-02907-6.

On the edges of medicine - a qualitative study on the function of complementary, alternative, and non-specific therapies in handling therapeutically indeterminate situations.医学边缘——定性研究补充、替代和非特异性疗法在处理治疗不确定情况中的作用。

BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Apr 23;20(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0945-4.

A discursive exploration of public perspectives on placebos and their effects.对公众对安慰剂及其效果的看法进行的论述性探讨。

Health Psychol Open. 2019 Feb 15;6(1):2055102919832313. doi: 10.1177/2055102919832313. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.

How often do general practitioners use placebos and non-specific interventions? Systematic review and meta-analysis of surveys.全科医生使用安慰剂和非特异性干预措施的频率是多少？系统评价和调查的荟萃分析。

PLoS One. 2018 Aug 24;13(8):e0202211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202211. eCollection 2018.

Placebos Without Deception: Outcomes, Mechanisms, and Ethics.安慰剂而非欺骗：结果、机制与伦理。

Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;138:219-240. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Apr 4.

Patient attitudes about the clinical use of placebo: qualitative perspectives from a telephone survey.患者对安慰剂临床应用的态度：电话调查的定性观点

BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 4;6(4):e011012. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-011012.

When and why placebo-prescribing is acceptable and unacceptable: a focus group study of patients' views.安慰剂处方何时以及为何是可接受和不可接受的：一项关于患者观点的焦点小组研究

PLoS One. 2014 Jul 9;9(7):e101822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101822. eCollection 2014.

Placebo use in the UK: a qualitative study exploring GPs' views on placebo effects in clinical practice.英国的安慰剂使用情况：一项探索全科医生对临床实践中安慰剂效应看法的定性研究。

Fam Pract. 2014 Jun;31(3):357-63. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmu016. Epub 2014 Apr 15.

The use of placebo and non-specific therapies and their relation to basic professional attitudes and the use of complementary therapies among German physicians--a cross-sectional survey.德国医生中安慰剂和非特异性疗法的使用及其与基本专业态度和补充疗法的使用的关系——一项横断面调查。

PLoS One. 2014 Apr 2;9(4):e92938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092938. eCollection 2014.

Placebo use in the United kingdom: results from a national survey of primary care practitioners.英国的安慰剂使用情况：初级保健从业者的全国调查结果。

PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058247. Epub 2013 Mar 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验