• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A discursive exploration of public perspectives on placebos and their effects.对公众对安慰剂及其效果的看法进行的论述性探讨。
Health Psychol Open. 2019 Feb 15;6(1):2055102919832313. doi: 10.1177/2055102919832313. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.
2
Placebo use in the UK: a qualitative study exploring GPs' views on placebo effects in clinical practice.英国的安慰剂使用情况:一项探索全科医生对临床实践中安慰剂效应看法的定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2014 Jun;31(3):357-63. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmu016. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
3
Harnessing the power of placebos in movement disorders: Insights from Parkinson's disease in clinical research and practice.在运动障碍中利用安慰剂的力量:来自临床研究和实践中的帕金森病的启示。
Mov Disord. 2018 Aug;33(8):1195-1203. doi: 10.1002/mds.27409. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
4
Perception and practice of placebo use among physicians in Mangalore.芒格洛尔医生对安慰剂使用的认知与实践
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Mar 26;9(3):1424-1430. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1052_19. eCollection 2020 Mar.
5
What trial participants need to be told about placebo effects to give informed consent: a survey to establish existing knowledge among patients with back pain.为了让试验参与者在知情同意的情况下了解安慰剂效应,他们需要知道什么:一项针对腰痛患者现有知识的调查。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Dec;43(12):867-870. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103964. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
6
Placebo theory and its implications for research and clinical practice: a review of the recent literature.安慰剂理论及其对研究和临床实践的启示:近期文献综述
Pain Pract. 2007 Mar;7(1):4-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2007.00104.x.
7
The role of placebos in family medicine: Implications of evidence and ethics for general practitioners.安慰剂在家庭医学中的作用:证据和伦理对全科医生的影响。
Aust J Gen Pract. 2019 Oct;48(10):700-705. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-05-19-4939.
8
The patient's perspective of placebo use in daily practice: a qualitative study.患者视角下日常实践中安慰剂的使用:一项定性研究。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2014 Feb 13;144:w13899. doi: 10.4414/smw.2014.13899.
9
Placebos, placebo effect, and the response to the healing situation: the evolution of a concept.安慰剂、安慰剂效应与对治疗情境的反应:一个概念的演变
Epilepsia. 2001 Dec;42(12):1614-25. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.41601.x.
10
From substance to process: A meta-ethnographic review of how healthcare professionals and patients understand placebos and their effects in primary care.从实体到过程:对医疗保健专业人员和患者如何理解安慰剂及其在初级保健中的作用的元民族志综述。
Health (London). 2020 May;24(3):315-340. doi: 10.1177/1363459318800169. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of contextual factors on patient outcomes following conservative low back pain treatment: systematic review.语境因素对保守治疗下慢性腰痛患者结局的影响:系统评价。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2022 Apr 21;30(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12998-022-00430-8.
2
Patients' experiences treated with open-label placebo versus double-blind placebo: a mixed methods qualitative study.患者接受开放性标签安慰剂与双盲安慰剂治疗的体验:一项混合方法定性研究。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Feb 4;10(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00731-w.
3
Critiquing the Critique: Resisting Commonplace Criticisms of Antidepressants in Online Platforms.批判批判:抵制在线平台上对抗抑郁药的常见批评。
Qual Health Res. 2021 Dec;31(14):2617-2628. doi: 10.1177/10497323211040768. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
4
Placebo From an Enactive Perspective.从生成认知视角看安慰剂
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 2;12:660118. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660118. eCollection 2021.
5
An Exploration of Knowledge and Attitudes of Medical Students and Rheumatologists to Placebo and Nocebo Effects: Threshold Concepts in Clinical Practice.医学生和风湿病学家对安慰剂和反安慰剂效应的认知与态度探索:临床实践中的阈概念
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020 Jun 22;7:2382120520930764. doi: 10.1177/2382120520930764. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
6
Perception and practice of placebo use among physicians in Mangalore.芒格洛尔医生对安慰剂使用的认知与实践
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Mar 26;9(3):1424-1430. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1052_19. eCollection 2020 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
The Meaning Response, "Placebo," and Methods.意义反应、“安慰剂”与方法。
Perspect Biol Med. 2018;61(3):361-378. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2018.0049.
2
Open label placebo: can honestly prescribed placebos evoke meaningful therapeutic benefits?开放性安慰剂:诚实开出的安慰剂能否带来有意义的治疗效果?
BMJ. 2018 Oct 2;363:k3889. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3889.
3
From substance to process: A meta-ethnographic review of how healthcare professionals and patients understand placebos and their effects in primary care.从实体到过程:对医疗保健专业人员和患者如何理解安慰剂及其在初级保健中的作用的元民族志综述。
Health (London). 2020 May;24(3):315-340. doi: 10.1177/1363459318800169. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
4
How often do general practitioners use placebos and non-specific interventions? Systematic review and meta-analysis of surveys.全科医生使用安慰剂和非特异性干预措施的频率是多少?系统评价和调查的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 24;13(8):e0202211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202211. eCollection 2018.
5
Implications of Placebo and Nocebo Effects for Clinical Practice: Expert Consensus.安慰剂和反安慰剂效应对临床实践的影响:专家共识。
Psychother Psychosom. 2018;87(4):204-210. doi: 10.1159/000490354. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
6
Placebos Without Deception: Outcomes, Mechanisms, and Ethics.安慰剂而非欺骗:结果、机制与伦理。
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;138:219-240. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
7
Expectancy Modulation of Opioid Neurotransmission.期待调节阿片类神经递质传递。
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;138:17-37. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
8
An enactive account of placebo effects.安慰剂效应的具身认知解释。
Biol Philos. 2017;32(4):507-533. doi: 10.1007/s10539-017-9572-4. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
9
Open-label placebo treatment in chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.慢性下腰痛的开放标签安慰剂治疗:一项随机对照试验。
Pain. 2016 Dec;157(12):2766-2772. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000700.
10
A comparative study with depressed patients on the acceptability of placebo use.一项关于安慰剂使用可接受性的抑郁症患者对比研究。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016 Jul-Aug;41:53-6. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 May 20.

对公众对安慰剂及其效果的看法进行的论述性探讨。

A discursive exploration of public perspectives on placebos and their effects.

作者信息

Hardman Doug I, Geraghty Adam Wa, Howick Jeremy, Roberts Nia, Bishop Felicity L

机构信息

University of Southampton, UK.

University of Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Health Psychol Open. 2019 Feb 15;6(1):2055102919832313. doi: 10.1177/2055102919832313. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.

DOI:10.1177/2055102919832313
PMID:30800412
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6378439/
Abstract

There is increasing evidence that placebos could be effective in clinical practice. However, knowledge of public perspectives on placebos is underdeveloped. We conducted a discourse analysis of internet comments on news articles related to placebos, aiming to improve this knowledge for clinicians and researchers. We developed two discursive constructs of the placebo. The dominant construct of the 'placebo pill' informs a paradoxical understanding of placebos that closes down treatment. The less-prevalent counter-discursive construct of the 'treatment process' frames placebos as potentially viable within modern evidence-based medicine. We discuss the opportunities and challenges of this alternative understanding of placebos.

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,安慰剂在临床实践中可能有效。然而,公众对安慰剂的看法却知之甚少。我们对与安慰剂相关的新闻文章的互联网评论进行了话语分析,旨在为临床医生和研究人员增进这方面的了解。我们构建了两种关于安慰剂的话语结构。占主导地位的“安慰剂药丸”结构形成了一种对安慰剂的矛盾理解,这种理解阻碍了治疗。不太普遍的“治疗过程”反话语结构则将安慰剂视为现代循证医学中潜在可行的方法。我们讨论了这种对安慰剂的另类理解所带来的机遇和挑战。