Takaya T, Niwa K, Muraoka M, Ogita I, Nagai N, Yano R, Kimura G, Yoshikawa Y, Yoshikawa H, Takada K
Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, Japan.
J Control Release. 1998 Jan 2;50(1-3):111-22. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(97)00123-5.
The relationship between in vitro drug release characteristics from colon delivery systems and in vivo drug absorption was investigated using three kinds of delayed-release systems. 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), tegafur (FT) and carbamazepine (CBZ) were selected as model drugs. Pressure-controlled colon delivery capsules (PCC) for liquid preparations, time-controlled colon delivery capsules (TCC) for liquid and solid preparations and Eudragit S coated tablets for solid preparations were used in this study. At first, in vitro dissolution tests for all preparations were performed. Drug release from solid preparations was delayed compared to that from liquid preparations with all three drugs. Next, these preparations were administered to fasted beagle dogs. For 5-ASA, the mean Cmaxs (peak level) of Eudragit S coated tablets and PCC were 5.52 and 16.89 micrograms ml-1, respectively. The mean Tmaxs (time when drug reached peak level) were 3.0 and 5.3 h. AUCs were 22.57 and 48.09 micrograms.h ml-1, respectively. For FT, Cmaxs of Eudragit S coated tablet and PCC were 0.87 and 1.46 micrograms ml-1, and Tmaxs were 7.0 and 6.7 h, respectively. AUCs were 9.73 and 15.55 micrograms.h ml-1 and bioavailabilities were 43.79 and 70.84%. For CBZ, the mean Cmaxs of liquid preparations and solid preparations were 0.37 and 0.22 micrograms ml-1, respectively. The mean Tmaxs were 4.7 and 4.3 h. AUCs were 0.673 and 0.392 micrograms.h ml-1. With liquid preparations, drug was thought to contact to the colonic membrane easily because of lack of interference by stools, and to be absorbed well as compared with solid preparations. From these findings, drug release from colon delivery systems and drug dissolution in the colonic lumen are very important factors for the systemic availability of drugs from the colon delivery systems.
使用三种缓释系统研究了结肠给药系统的体外药物释放特性与体内药物吸收之间的关系。选择5-氨基水杨酸(5-ASA)、替加氟(FT)和卡马西平(CBZ)作为模型药物。本研究使用了用于液体制剂的压力控制结肠给药胶囊(PCC)、用于液体制剂和固体制剂的时间控制结肠给药胶囊(TCC)以及用于固体制剂的Eudragit S包衣片。首先,对所有制剂进行体外溶出试验。与所有三种药物的液体制剂相比,固体制剂的药物释放延迟。接下来,将这些制剂给予禁食的比格犬。对于5-ASA,Eudragit S包衣片和PCC的平均Cmaxs(峰值水平)分别为5.52和16.89微克/毫升。平均Tmaxs(药物达到峰值水平的时间)分别为3.0和5.3小时。AUCs分别为22.57和48.09微克·小时/毫升。对于FT,Eudragit S包衣片和PCC的Cmaxs分别为0.87和1.46微克/毫升,Tmaxs分别为7.0和6.7小时。AUCs分别为9.73和15.55微克·小时/毫升,生物利用度分别为43.79%和70.84%。对于CBZ,液体制剂和固体制剂的平均Cmaxs分别为0.37和0.22微克/毫升。平均Tmaxs分别为4.7和4.3小时。AUCs分别为0.673和0.392微克·小时/毫升。对于液体制剂,由于不受粪便干扰,药物被认为容易与结肠膜接触,并且与固体制剂相比吸收良好。从这些发现来看,结肠给药系统的药物释放以及药物在结肠腔中的溶解是影响结肠给药系统药物全身可用性的非常重要的因素。