Suppr超能文献

大脑切除术后音乐与语言功能的分离:一例新的无失语症失乐症病例

[Dissociations between music and language functions after cerebral resection: A new case of amusia without aphasia].

作者信息

Peretz I, Belleville S, Fontaine S

机构信息

Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Côte-des Neiges, Montréal, Quêbec, Canada

出版信息

Can J Exp Psychol. 1997 Dec;51(4):354-68.

PMID:9687196
Abstract

We present the neuropsychological study of a patient, I.R., who sustained bilateral damage to the temporal lobes and to the right frontal lobe as a result of successive brain surgeries that occurred ten years earlier. The patient is 40 years old and right-handed; she had no special training in music or in language, representing, therefore, the large majority of listeners. Her performance is compared to that of four neurologically intact subjects who are closely matched in terms of education, sex and age. In the present study, we report I.R.'s performance on various tests aiming at assessing her general cognitive functioning with a particular focus on auditory aspects. The results show that, despite extensive damage to her auditory cortex, I.R.'s speech abilities are essentially intact (see Tables 1 and 2). The only impairments that are detected in the language domain are related to a short-term memory deficit, to some abnormal sensitivity to retroactive interference in long-term memory (see Table 3) and to articulation. These difficulties do not, however, affect linguistic communication, which is obviously undisturbed I.R. is not aphasic). Similarly, I.R. does not experience any difficulty in the recognition and memorization of familiar sounds such as animal cries, traffic noises and the like (see Tables 5 and 7). In contrast, I.R. is severely impaired in most musical abilities: She can no longer discriminate nor identify melodies that were once highly familiar to her; she can no longer discriminate nor memorize novel melodies (see Table 4). Her pattern of musical losses is compatible with a basic and severe perceptual deficit that compromises access to and registration in memory systems. The observation that the auditory impairment affects music and spares language and environmental sounds refers to a neuropsychological condition that is known as music agnosia. I.R. represents, to our knowledge, the fourth case of music agnosia available in the literature (Peretz et al., 1994; Griffiths et al., 1997). The existence of such cases suggests that music processing is not mediated by a general-purpose auditory architecture but by specialized cortical subsystems. Not only does I.R. suffer from music agnosia, but she is also impaired in the discrimination and recognition of musical instruments and of human voices (see Table 5). These latter two deficits probably do not result from the music agnosic condition. Rather, they seem to reflect damage to adjacent brain areas that are specialized in timbre processing (see Peretz. et al., 1994, for the relevant discussion). It is also worth mentioning that I.R. appears to be impaired in musical expressive abilities as well: I.R. can no longer sing a single note. Thus, her losses are rather general in the musical domain, hence justifying the classification of her case as amusia. Cases of amusia without aphasia are relatively frequent in the neuropsychological literature. However, all of these reported cases are anecdotal. Thus, in the present study, special focus is given to the measurement and direct comparison of performance in the language and music domain; in both domains, task characteristics and materials were as similar as possible. To this aim, the lyrics and the tune of the same popular song excerpts were used. The musical and the spoken parts were presented separately in a primed familiarity decision task and in a memory recognition task. In both situations, I.R. performs at or close to chance when she has to deal with music, whereas she recognizes easily and performs normally on the spoken material (see Tables 6 and 7). These results clearly argue for the autonomy of music and language in the processing of auditory information.

摘要

我们介绍了对患者I.R.的神经心理学研究。该患者因十年前连续进行的脑部手术,导致颞叶和右侧额叶双侧受损。患者40岁,惯用右手;她没有音乐或语言方面的特殊训练,因此代表了大多数听众。将她的表现与四名神经功能正常的受试者进行比较,这四名受试者在教育程度、性别和年龄方面与之相近。在本研究中,我们报告了I.R.在各种测试中的表现,这些测试旨在评估她的一般认知功能,特别关注听觉方面。结果表明,尽管她的听觉皮层受到广泛损伤,但I.R.的语言能力基本完好(见表1和表2)。在语言领域检测到的唯一损伤与短期记忆缺陷、对长期记忆中追溯干扰的一些异常敏感性(见表3)以及发音有关。然而,这些困难并不影响语言交流,显然I.R.没有失语症)。同样,I.R.在识别和记忆熟悉的声音,如动物叫声、交通噪音等方面没有任何困难(见表5和表7)。相比之下,I.R.在大多数音乐能力方面严重受损:她再也无法辨别或识别曾经非常熟悉的旋律;她再也无法辨别或记忆新的旋律(见表4)。她的音乐丧失模式与一种基本且严重的感知缺陷相符,这种缺陷损害了对记忆系统的访问和登记。听觉损伤影响音乐而不影响语言和环境声音这一观察结果指的是一种被称为音乐失认症的神经心理学状况。据我们所知,I.R.是文献中报道的第四例音乐失认症病例(佩雷茨等人,1994年;格里菲斯等人,1997年)。此类病例的存在表明,音乐处理不是由通用的听觉结构介导的,而是由专门的皮层子系统介导的。I.R.不仅患有音乐失认症,而且在辨别和识别乐器及人声方面也有损伤(见表5)。后两种缺陷可能不是由音乐失认症导致的。相反,它们似乎反映了对专门处理音色的相邻脑区的损伤(有关相关讨论,请参见佩雷茨等人,1994年)。还值得一提的是,I.R.在音乐表达能力方面似乎也有损伤:I.R.再也唱不出一个音符。因此,她在音乐领域的丧失相当普遍,因此将她的病例归类为失乐症是合理的。在神经心理学文献中,无失语症的失乐症病例相对常见。然而,所有这些报道的病例都是轶事性的。因此,在本研究中特别关注语言和音乐领域表现的测量和直接比较;在这两个领域,任务特征和材料尽可能相似。为此,使用了同一首流行歌曲片段的歌词和曲调。音乐部分和口语部分分别在启动的熟悉度判定任务和记忆识别任务中呈现。在这两种情况下,I.R.在处理音乐时表现接近或处于随机水平,而她很容易识别口语材料并正常表现(见表6和表7)。这些结果清楚地证明了音乐和语言在听觉信息处理中的自主性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验