• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区中风康复开放转诊系统的经验。

Experience of an open referral system for stroke rehabilitation in the community.

作者信息

Maheswaran R, Davis S

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College School of Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 1998 Jun;12(3):265-71. doi: 10.1191/026921598670048508.

DOI:10.1191/026921598670048508
PMID:9688043
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine referral patterns and characteristics of patients assessed by a community stroke rehabilitation service utilizing an open referral system.

DESIGN

Descriptive study.

SETTING

Two boroughs in a health district in South London, England.

SUBJECTS

Two hundred and seventy-six patients with stroke assessed by the service in its first 18 months of operation.

RESULTS

Patients were referred from a variety of sources including hospitals (38%), general practitioners (18%), district nurses (10%), social services (9%), self-referrals (8%), community physiotherapists (7%) and family or carers (2%). Referrals from hospital were younger (33% aged under 65 years) while referrals from community health and social services were older (44% aged 75-84 years) (chi(2) = 23, df = 9, p < 0.01). Fifty per cent of patients who had self-referred or had been referred by families or carers had longstanding stroke (> 1 year), 46% of patients from general practitioners had acute stroke (< 4 weeks) and 37% of hospital patients were seen between one and three months post stroke (chi(2) = 50.4, df = 12, p < 0.001). There was a marginally significant difference in the prevalence of incontinence and no significant differences in limb weakness, visual impairment and speech impairment. There were no significant changes in sources of referral between the first and second nine months of the service. There was a significant increase in the percentage of patients with recent stroke seen in the second nine months (chi(2) = 22.8, df = 5, p < 0.001). In this period, 36% of patients assessed were seen within four weeks of their stroke compared with 15% in the first nine months. Of patients with stroke, 8.7% were considered to have been inappropriate referrals but they were not significantly associated with any particular source of referral.

CONCLUSIONS

Referrals were received from a wide variety of sources with significant differences in age and duration of stroke of patients from different referral sources. The results suggest that an open referral system may make rehabilitation accessible to a broader range of patients with stroke living in the community.

摘要

目的

通过使用开放式转诊系统,研究社区中风康复服务所评估患者的转诊模式及特征。

设计

描述性研究。

地点

英国伦敦南部一个健康区的两个行政区。

研究对象

该服务在运营的前18个月内评估的276例中风患者。

结果

患者转诊来源多样,包括医院(38%)、全科医生(18%)、社区护士(10%)、社会服务机构(9%)、自我转诊(8%)、社区物理治疗师(7%)以及家庭或护理人员(2%)。来自医院的转诊患者较为年轻(33%年龄在65岁以下),而来自社区卫生和社会服务机构的转诊患者年龄较大(44%年龄在75 - 84岁)(卡方检验:χ² = 23,自由度df = 9,p < 0.01)。自我转诊或由家庭或护理人员转诊的患者中,50%患有长期中风(>1年);来自全科医生的患者中,46%患有急性中风(<4周);37%的医院患者在中风后1至3个月就诊(卡方检验:χ² = 50.4,自由度df = 12,p < 0.001)。失禁患病率存在微小显著差异,肢体无力、视力障碍和言语障碍方面无显著差异。服务的前九个月和后九个月之间,转诊来源无显著变化。后九个月中,近期中风患者的比例显著增加(卡方检验:χ² = 22.8,自由度df = 5,p < 0.001)。在此期间,36%接受评估的患者在中风后四周内就诊,而前九个月这一比例为15%。中风患者中,8.7%被认为是不适当的转诊,但它们与任何特定转诊来源均无显著关联。

结论

转诊来源广泛,不同转诊来源的患者在年龄和中风病程方面存在显著差异。结果表明,开放式转诊系统可能使更广泛的社区中风患者能够获得康复服务。

相似文献

1
Experience of an open referral system for stroke rehabilitation in the community.社区中风康复开放转诊系统的经验。
Clin Rehabil. 1998 Jun;12(3):265-71. doi: 10.1191/026921598670048508.
2
Effect of triage on waiting time for community rehabilitation: a prospective cohort study.分诊对社区康复等候时间的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Mar;93(3):441-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.021. Epub 2012 Jan 14.
3
[A study on patients utilizing 'rehabilitation' at the community level--special characteristics of patients without stroke].
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 1992 Aug;39(8):489-96.
4
Reducing waiting time for community rehabilitation services: a controlled before-and-after trial.减少社区康复服务的等候时间:一项对照前后试验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jan;94(1):23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.08.207. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
5
Home-based rehabilitation for people with stroke: a comparative study of six community services providing co-ordinated, multidisciplinary treatment.中风患者的居家康复:六项提供协调多学科治疗的社区服务的比较研究。
Clin Rehabil. 2001 Dec;15(6):589-99. doi: 10.1191/0269215501cr452oa.
6
Improved access and targeting of musculoskeletal services in northwest Wales: targeted early access to musculoskeletal services (TEAMS) programme.威尔士西北部肌肉骨骼服务的可及性与针对性改善:肌肉骨骼服务早期靶向接入(TEAMS)项目
BMJ. 2004 Dec 4;329(7478):1325-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7478.1325.
7
A training programme did not increase agreement between allied health clinicians prioritizing patients for community rehabilitation.一项培训计划并没有增加从事社区康复的临床医疗人员对患者进行优先排序的一致性。
Clin Rehabil. 2011 Jul;25(7):599-606. doi: 10.1177/0269215510389344. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
8
Access to Rehabilitation at Six Months Post Stroke: A Profile from the Action on Secondary Prevention Interventions and Rehabilitation in Stroke (ASPIRE-S) Study.中风后六个月的康复情况:来自中风二级预防干预与康复行动(ASPIRE-S)研究的概况
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;42(3-4):247-54. doi: 10.1159/000446080. Epub 2016 May 14.
9
Post-acute referral of stroke victims in a French urban area: Results of a specific program.法国城区脑卒中患者的后期转诊:一项特定方案的结果。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Sep;59(4):248-54. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
10
The birth of a specialty: the first ten thousand patients of an old age psychiatry service.一个专科的诞生:老年精神病学服务的首批一万名患者
Int Psychogeriatr. 2007 Feb;19(1):53-63. doi: 10.1017/S1041610206003759.

引用本文的文献

1
'Valuing people'--a new strategy for learning disability for the 21st century: how may it impinge on primary care?“重视人”——21世纪学习障碍的新策略:它可能如何影响初级医疗保健?
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Oct;51(471):788-90.
2
The primary care stroke gap.初级保健中的卒中差距。
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Oct;51(471):787-8.