Monset-Couchard M, de Bethmann O, Relier J P
Service de Médecine Néonatale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Cochin Port-Royal, Université Paris V-René-Descartes.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1998 Jun;27(4):430-7.
To compare the family status and neurodevelopment of triplets conceived by spontaneous pregnancy (SP), ovarian stimulation (OS), in vitro fertilization (IVF), and gametal intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT).
A follow-up study consisted of neurodevelopmental examination and/or of interviews of parents/pediatricians/teachers and social workers. Outcome of the children was categorized as defective (mild, moderate, severe) or normal.
The Port-Royal neonatal unit and follow-up clinic.
From 1/01/1987 to 31/12/94, one to all three neonatal triplets were admitted to the Port-Royal neonatal unit. Pregnancy was SP in 12, OS in 24, IVF in 36, GIFT in 5. All survivors (36 SP, 68 OS, 98 IVF, 14 GIFT) were included and their outcome (at 3 to 10 years of age) was known in 75 families.
Prematurity < 32 weeks was highest in the SP pregnancies, with no birth > 37 weeks, and more small-for-dates babies. As of this writing, the neurodevelopmental status was normal or included only a mild deficit (mainly visual corrections) in 82% of SP survivors, 94% of OS survivors, 98% of IVF survivors, all 14 GIFT survivors. Moderate and major deficits were found in one or two siblings of 7 sets of triplets, 5 of which were born < 32 weeks (1 SP, 3 OS, 1 IVF). In all groups, family status was characterized by the need to move, financial problems, maternal exhaustion and parental breakdowns. Five OS mothers, 5 IVF mothers, and one GIFT mother each had one to three subsequent SP pregnancies. In 1997, all families included one to eight children. Because of the cumulative effect of losses, deficits, and other post-natal difficulties, only one of four families had no problems.
The overall outcome of surviving triplets is good but they are both a prenatal and post-natal hardship for the parents, chiefly the mother. We advocate a more cautious use of OS, no triple implantation at the first IVF, and more social help and guidance for the families during the pregnancy and the first 3 years of life of the triplets.
比较自然受孕(SP)、卵巢刺激(OS)、体外受精(IVF)和配子输卵管内移植(GIFT)受孕的三胞胎的家庭状况和神经发育情况。
一项随访研究,包括神经发育检查和/或对父母/儿科医生/教师及社会工作者的访谈。儿童的结局分为有缺陷(轻度、中度、重度)或正常。
皇家港口新生儿科及随访诊所。
1987年1月1日至1994年12月31日,皇家港口新生儿科收治了一至全部三名新生儿三胞胎。12例为自然受孕,24例为卵巢刺激,36例为体外受精,5例为配子输卵管内移植。所有存活者(36例自然受孕、68例卵巢刺激、98例体外受精、14例配子输卵管内移植)均被纳入研究,75个家庭了解其结局(3至10岁时)。
自然受孕妊娠中早产<32周的比例最高,无出生孕周>37周的情况,且小于胎龄儿更多。截至撰写本文时,82%的自然受孕存活者、94%的卵巢刺激存活者、98%的体外受精存活者以及所有14例配子输卵管内移植存活者的神经发育状况正常或仅存在轻度缺陷(主要是视力矫正方面)。在7组三胞胎中的一两个兄弟姐妹中发现了中度和重度缺陷,其中5例出生孕周<32周(1例自然受孕、3例卵巢刺激、1例体外受精)。在所有组中,家庭状况的特点是需要搬家、经济问题、母亲疲惫和父母关系破裂。5例卵巢刺激受孕母亲、5例体外受精受孕母亲和1例配子输卵管内移植受孕母亲之后各自有1至3次自然受孕妊娠。1997年,所有家庭有1至8个孩子。由于损失、缺陷及其他产后困难的累积影响,四个家庭中只有一个没有问题。
存活三胞胎的总体结局良好,但对父母尤其是母亲来说,他们在产前和产后都是一种负担。我们主张更谨慎地使用卵巢刺激,首次体外受精时不进行三胚胎植入,并在三胞胎妊娠期间及出生后的头3年为家庭提供更多社会帮助和指导。