• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴基斯坦儿童肺炎患者中复方新诺明与阿莫西林的抗菌耐药性及临床疗效比较:随机对照试验。巴基斯坦复方新诺明研究小组

Antimicrobial resistance and clinical effectiveness of co-trimoxazole versus amoxycillin for pneumonia among children in Pakistan: randomised controlled trial. Pakistan Co-trimoxazole Study Group.

作者信息

Straus W L, Qazi S A, Kundi Z, Nomani N K, Schwartz B

机构信息

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, USA.

出版信息

Lancet. 1998 Jul 25;352(9124):270-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)10294-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)10294-x
PMID:9690406
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Co-trimoxazole is widely used in treatment of paediatric pneumonia in developing countries, but drug resistance may decrease its effectiveness. We studied the effectiveness of co-trimoxazole compared with that of amoxycillin in pneumonia therapy, and assessed the clinical impact of co-trimoxazole resistance.

METHODS

We recruited 595 children, aged 2-59 months, with non-severe or severe pneumonia (WHO criteria) diagnosed in the outpatient wards of two urban Pakistan hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned on a 2:1 basis co-trimoxazole (n=398) or amoxycillin (n=197) in standard WHO doses and dosing schedules, and were monitored in study wards. The primary outcome was inpatient therapy failure (clinical criteria) or clinical evidence of pneumonia at outpatient follow-up examination.

FINDINGS

There were 92 (23%) therapy failures in the co-trimoxazole group and 30 (15%) in the amoxycillin group (p=0.03)-26 (13%) versus 12 (12%) among children with non-severe pneumonia (p=0.856) and 66 (33%) versus 18 (18%) among those with severe pneumonia (p=0.009). For patients with severe pneumonia, age under 1 year (p=0.056) and positive chest radiographs (p=0.005) also predicted therapy failure. There was no significant association between antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentration and outcome among bacteraemic children treated with co-trimoxazole.

INTERPRETATION

Co-trimoxazole provided effective therapy in non-severe pneumonia. For severe, life-threatening pneumonia, however, co-trimoxazole is less likely than amoxycillin to be effective.

摘要

背景

复方新诺明在发展中国家被广泛用于治疗小儿肺炎,但耐药性可能会降低其疗效。我们研究了复方新诺明与阿莫西林在肺炎治疗中的有效性,并评估了复方新诺明耐药性的临床影响。

方法

我们招募了595名年龄在2至59个月之间、在巴基斯坦两家城市医院门诊病房被诊断为非重症或重症肺炎(按照世界卫生组织标准)的儿童。患者按2:1的比例随机分配接受标准世界卫生组织剂量和给药方案的复方新诺明(n = 398)或阿莫西林(n = 197)治疗,并在研究病房接受监测。主要结局是住院治疗失败(临床标准)或门诊随访检查时肺炎的临床证据。

结果

复方新诺明组有92例(23%)治疗失败,阿莫西林组有30例(15%)(p = 0.03)——非重症肺炎儿童中分别为26例(13%)和12例(12%)(p = 0.856),重症肺炎儿童中分别为66例(33%)和18例(18%)(p = 0.009)。对于重症肺炎患者,1岁以下年龄(p = 0.056)和胸部X光片阳性(p = 0.005)也预示着治疗失败。在接受复方新诺明治疗的菌血症儿童中,抗菌药物最低抑菌浓度与结局之间无显著关联。

解读

复方新诺明对非重症肺炎提供了有效的治疗。然而,对于严重的、危及生命的肺炎,复方新诺明比阿莫西林有效的可能性更小。

相似文献

1
Antimicrobial resistance and clinical effectiveness of co-trimoxazole versus amoxycillin for pneumonia among children in Pakistan: randomised controlled trial. Pakistan Co-trimoxazole Study Group.巴基斯坦儿童肺炎患者中复方新诺明与阿莫西林的抗菌耐药性及临床疗效比较:随机对照试验。巴基斯坦复方新诺明研究小组
Lancet. 1998 Jul 25;352(9124):270-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)10294-x.
2
Clinical efficacy of co-trimoxazole versus amoxicillin twice daily for treatment of pneumonia: a randomised controlled clinical trial in Pakistan.复方新诺明与阿莫西林每日两次治疗肺炎的临床疗效:巴基斯坦的一项随机对照临床试验
Arch Dis Child. 2002 Feb;86(2):113-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.86.2.113.
3
Antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia in children.儿童社区获得性肺炎的抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 4;2013(6):CD004874. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004874.pub4.
4
Comparison of 3 Days Amoxicillin Versus 5 Days Co-Trimoxazole for Treatment of Fast-breathing Pneumonia by Community Health Workers in Children Aged 2-59 Months in Pakistan: A Cluster-randomized Trial.社区卫生工作者用 3 天阿莫西林与 5 天复方磺胺甲噁唑治疗 2-59 月龄儿童急性呼吸急促:一项在巴基斯坦的群组随机试验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jul 18;69(3):397-404. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy918.
5
Effectiveness of 3-day amoxycillin vs. 5-day co-trimoxazole in the treatment of non-severe pneumonia in children aged 2-59 months of age: a multi-centric open labeled trial.3天阿莫西林与5天复方新诺明治疗2至59个月儿童非重症肺炎的疗效:一项多中心开放标签试验。
J Trop Pediatr. 2008 Dec;54(6):382-9. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmn050. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
6
Comparison of standard versus double dose of amoxicillin in the treatment of non-severe pneumonia in children aged 2-59 months: a multi-centre, double blind, randomised controlled trial in Pakistan.标准剂量与双倍剂量阿莫西林治疗2至59个月儿童非重症肺炎的比较:巴基斯坦一项多中心、双盲、随机对照试验
Arch Dis Child. 2007 Apr;92(4):291-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.092494. Epub 2006 Mar 17.
7
Trial of co-trimoxazole versus procaine penicillin with ampicillin in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in young Gambian children.复方新诺明与普鲁卡因青霉素联合氨苄西林治疗冈比亚幼儿社区获得性肺炎的试验
Lancet. 1988 Nov 19;2(8621):1182-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90244-9.
8
Effectiveness of community case management of severe pneumonia with oral amoxicillin in children aged 2-59 months in Matiari district, rural Pakistan: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.巴基斯坦马蒂亚里农村地区 2-59 月龄儿童口服阿莫西林治疗重症肺炎的社区病例管理效果:一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2012 Feb 25;379(9817):729-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61714-5. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
9
Community case management of severe pneumonia with oral amoxicillin in children aged 2-59 months in Haripur district, Pakistan: a cluster randomised trial.巴基斯坦哈普尔地区 2-59 月龄儿童口服阿莫西林治疗严重肺炎的社区病例管理:一项整群随机试验。
Lancet. 2011 Nov 19;378(9805):1796-803. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61140-9. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
10
Protective efficacy of prolonged co-trimoxazole prophylaxis in HIV-exposed children up to age 4 years for the prevention of malaria in Uganda: a randomised controlled open-label trial.在乌干达,针对预防疟疾,HIV 暴露儿童长达 4 岁时延长复方新诺明预防的保护效果:一项随机对照、开放标签试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Dec;2(12):e727-36. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70329-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotics for Paediatric Community-Acquired Pneumonia: What is the Optimal Course Duration?用于儿童社区获得性肺炎的抗生素:最佳疗程是多久?
Paediatr Drugs. 2025 May;27(3):261-272. doi: 10.1007/s40272-024-00680-4. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
2
Emergency care interventions for paediatric severe acute respiratory infections in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.中低收入国家儿科严重急性呼吸道感染的急救干预措施:系统评价和叙述性综合。
J Glob Health. 2023 Jun 9;13:04065. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04065.
3
Community case management of fast-breathing pneumonia with 3 days oral amoxicillin vs 5 days cotrimoxazole in children 2-59 months of age in rural Pakistan: A cluster randomized trial.
社区管理 2-59 月龄快速呼吸型肺炎,口服阿莫西林 3 天对比复方磺胺甲噁唑 5 天,在巴基斯坦农村:一项群组随机试验。
J Glob Health. 2022 Dec 29;12:04097. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04097.
4
Antimicrobial Resistance in Pneumococcal Carriage Isolates from Children under 2 Years of Age in Rural Pakistan.巴基斯坦农村地区 2 岁以下儿童肺炎链球菌带菌者的耐药性研究。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0101921. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.01019-21.
5
Community case management of chest indrawing pneumonia in children aged 2 to 59 months by community health workers: study protocol for a multi-country cluster randomized open label non-inferiority trial.社区卫生工作者对2至59个月大儿童的胸凹陷性肺炎进行社区病例管理:一项多国整群随机开放标签非劣效性试验的研究方案
Int J Clin Trials. 2020 Apr-Jun;7(2):131-141. doi: 10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20201719.
6
Comparison of 3 Days Amoxicillin Versus 5 Days Co-Trimoxazole for Treatment of Fast-breathing Pneumonia by Community Health Workers in Children Aged 2-59 Months in Pakistan: A Cluster-randomized Trial.社区卫生工作者用 3 天阿莫西林与 5 天复方磺胺甲噁唑治疗 2-59 月龄儿童急性呼吸急促:一项在巴基斯坦的群组随机试验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jul 18;69(3):397-404. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy918.
7
Antimicrobial Therapy in Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Children.儿童社区获得性肺炎的抗菌治疗
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2018 Sep 20;20(11):47. doi: 10.1007/s11908-018-0653-6.
8
Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Are All Countries Treating Children in the Same Way? A Literature Review.社区获得性肺炎的治疗:所有国家对儿童的治疗方式都一样吗?一项文献综述。
Int J Pediatr. 2017;2017:4239268. doi: 10.1155/2017/4239268. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
9
Childhood community-acquired pneumonia: A review of etiology- and antimicrobial treatment studies.儿童社区获得性肺炎:病因和抗菌治疗研究综述。
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2018 Mar;26:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of revised WHO guidelines for management of childhood pneumonia in 74 Countdown countries.74个倒计时国家中世界卫生组织儿童肺炎管理修订指南的成本效益分析。
J Glob Health. 2017 Jun;7(1):010409. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.010409.