Frasci G, Comella P, D'Aiuto G, Budillon A, Barbarulo D, Thomas R, Capasso I, Casaretti R, Daponte A, Caponigro F, Gravina A, Maiorino L, Caratení G, Gentile A, Comella G
Division of Medical Oncology, National Tumor Institute, Naples, Italy.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1998 May;49(1):13-26. doi: 10.1023/a:1005945218155.
In a previous phase I study we found the MTDs of paclitaxel and cisplatin when given together weekly, with or without G-CSF support, in patients with advanced solid tumors. The present study was conducted to define the toxicity and efficacy of this regimen, when used with G-CSF support, in chemotherapy-naive or pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer, and to compare the antiproliferative activity of paclitaxel-cisplatin and paclitaxel-doxorubicin combinations on two human breast cancer cell lines.
Patients with metastatic breast cancer received weekly paclitaxel (as a 3-hour i.v. infusion) at the dose of 85 mg/m2 (75 mg/m2 in pretreated women) followed by cisplatin (40 mg/m2) for a minimum of 6 weeks. An additional 6 weekly cycles were delivered in patients showing absence of documented disease progression after the first 6 weeks. After the 12th cycle only patients who had shown a substantial tumor shrinkage received 6 further cycles. G-CSF 5 microg/kg was also given, SC on days 3 to 5 of each week, for the whole duration of chemotherapy. The combination of paclitaxel with cisplatin or doxorubicin was also tested in vitro on two breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and MDAMB-231).
Forty-three women with metastatic breast cancer entered this trial between June 1995 and January 1997. Twenty-seven patients were previously untreated for their metastatic disease (but 23 had previously received adjuvant chemotherapy). The dominant site of disease involvement was visceral in 23, bone in 13, and soft tissues in 7 patients. Seven complete and 15 partial responses were observed in unpretreated patients, while no complete and 6 partial responses were achieved in the pretreated population. The overall response rate, assessed on an 'intent to treat' basis, was 81% (26% CRs) in patients unpretreated for metastatic disease and 37% in those who had received one or more previous chemotherapy regimens. Eighteen responder patients had previously received anthracyclines either as adjuvant chemotherapy (12) or in the treatment of metastatic disease (6). At a median potential follow-up of 12 (range, 3-21) months, 14/27 unpretreated and 12/16 pretreated patients had shown disease progression. The median time to treatment failure was 13 and 7 months, respectively, in the 2 subgroups. The 1-year survival probability was 95% in unpretreated patients. The treatment showed a moderate toxicity in both subgroups of patients. Both hematological toxicity and peripheral neuropathy occurred more frequently in pretreated patients. Treatment-related deaths did not occur, and severe myelosuppression was observed only in pretreated patients with massive liver involvement. Delays in chemotherapy administration were very uncommon, especially during the first 6 treatment cycles, and the average actually delivered dose intensity exceeded 90% in unpretreated patients. The in vitro data on MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cell lines showed that exposure to the combination of cisplatin and paclitaxel produced a tumor cell killing similar to that achievable with equivalent concentrations of doxorubicin and paclitaxel.
Weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin with G-CSF support is an active and particularly well tolerated treatment for patients with either unpretreated or pretreated metastatic breast cancer. This approach seems quite effective also in patients relapsing after anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy. In view of the negligible hematological toxicity associated with this regimen, further clinical trials testing the addition of non cross-resistant drugs to this combination should be performed.
在先前的一项I期研究中,我们发现了晚期实体瘤患者每周联合使用紫杉醇和顺铂时的最大耐受剂量(MTD),无论是否给予粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)支持。本研究旨在确定该方案在有或无G-CSF支持的情况下,用于未经化疗或先前接受过治疗的晚期乳腺癌患者时的毒性和疗效,并比较紫杉醇-顺铂和紫杉醇-阿霉素联合用药对两种人乳腺癌细胞系的抗增殖活性。
转移性乳腺癌患者接受每周一次的紫杉醇(静脉输注3小时),剂量为85mg/m²(先前接受过治疗的女性为75mg/m²),随后给予顺铂(40mg/m²),至少持续6周。在前6周未出现疾病进展记录的患者中,再进行6个每周周期的治疗。在第12个周期后,只有那些肿瘤明显缩小的患者再接受6个周期的治疗。在整个化疗期间,每周第3至5天皮下注射G-CSF 5μg/kg。紫杉醇与顺铂或阿霉素的联合用药也在两种乳腺癌细胞系(MCF-7和MDAMB-231)上进行了体外试验。
1995年6月至1997年1月期间,43例转移性乳腺癌女性患者进入该试验。27例患者先前未接受过转移性疾病的治疗(但其中23例先前接受过辅助化疗)。疾病受累的主要部位为内脏的有23例,骨的有13例,软组织的有7例。在未接受过治疗的患者中观察到7例完全缓解和15例部分缓解,而在先前接受过治疗的患者中未观察到完全缓解,有6例部分缓解。基于 “意向性治疗” 评估,未接受过转移性疾病治疗的患者总体缓解率为81%(26%为完全缓解),接受过一种或多种先前化疗方案的患者为37%。18例缓解患者先前接受过蒽环类药物治疗,其中12例为辅助化疗,6例为转移性疾病治疗。在中位潜在随访12个月(范围3 - 21个月)时,27例未接受过治疗的患者中有14例、16例先前接受过治疗的患者中有12例出现疾病进展。两个亚组中治疗失败的中位时间分别为13个月和7个月。未接受过治疗的患者1年生存概率为95%。该治疗在两个患者亚组中均显示出中度毒性。血液学毒性和周围神经病变在先前接受过治疗的患者中更频繁出现。未发生与治疗相关的死亡,仅在先前接受过治疗且有大量肝脏受累的患者中观察到严重的骨髓抑制。化疗给药延迟非常罕见,尤其是在前6个治疗周期,未接受过治疗的患者实际给予的平均剂量强度超过90%。在MCF-7和MDA-MB-231人乳腺癌细胞系上的体外数据表明,接触顺铂和紫杉醇的联合用药产生的肿瘤细胞杀伤作用与同等浓度的阿霉素和紫杉醇相当。
每周一次的紫杉醇和顺铂联合G-CSF支持,对于未接受过治疗或先前接受过治疗的转移性乳腺癌患者是一种有效的且耐受性特别好的治疗方法。这种方法对于基于蒽环类药物辅助化疗后复发的患者似乎也相当有效。鉴于该方案相关的血液学毒性可忽略不计,应进行进一步的临床试验,测试在该联合用药中添加非交叉耐药药物的效果。