• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哌拉西林/他唑巴坦单药治疗与头孢他啶加阿米卡星联合治疗作为中性粒细胞减少癌症患者发热的经验性治疗。

Monotherapy with piperacillin/tazobactam versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as an empiric therapy for fever in neutropenic cancer patients.

作者信息

Hess U, Böhme C, Rey K, Senn H J

机构信息

Department C for Internal Medicine, Kantonsspital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 1998 Jul;6(4):402-9. doi: 10.1007/s005200050184.

DOI:10.1007/s005200050184
PMID:9695210
Abstract

Between July 1993 and September 1996, 107 consecutive febrile episodes in 83 neutropenic cancer patients with a median age of 41 years were randomized to treatment either with piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g every 8 h i.v. or ceftazidime 2 g every 8 h plus amikacin 15 mg/kg i.v. per day. In the case of fever > 38 degrees C 48 h after initiation of the antibiotic therapy, vancomycin 500 mg every 6 h i.v. was added. The study population was at serious risk of a poor outcome, since 67% of the patients had leukemia or lymphoma, 19% of the febrile events occurred after autologous bone marrow or blood stem cell transplantation, the median total duration of neutropenia was 16 days, and the median neutrophil count at study inclusion was 0.09 x 10(9)/1. The two patient groups were comparable in terms of risk factors. Bacteremia was found in 37%, other microscopically documented infections in 16%, and clinically documented infections in 26% of the febrile episodes. Most (96) febrile episodes were evaluable for response. No significant difference was found between piperacillin/ tazobactam and ceftazidime plus amikacin in terms of success rate (81% versus 83%), empirical addition of vancomycin (42% versus 38%), median time to fever defervescence (3.3 versus 2.9 days) or median duration of antibiotic therapy (7.2 versus 7.4 days). No patient died from the infection. Both antibiotic regimens were well tolerated, the study treatment being stopped only in 1 patient because of toxicity (cutaneous allergy to piperacillin/tazobactam). On the basis of the 107 febrile events encountered, we conclude that piperacillin/tazobactam is a safe and effective monotherapy. To define the definitive value of piperacillin/ tazobactam as a monotherapy for febrile neutropenic patients a large randomized trial is warranted.

摘要

1993年7月至1996年9月期间,83例中性粒细胞减少的癌症患者连续出现107次发热,这些患者的中位年龄为41岁,被随机分为两组进行治疗,一组接受静脉注射哌拉西林/他唑巴坦4.5 g,每8小时1次;另一组接受静脉注射头孢他啶2 g,每8小时1次,加阿米卡星15 mg/kg,每日1次。如果抗生素治疗开始后48小时体温>38摄氏度,则加用静脉注射万古霉素500 mg,每6小时1次。研究人群预后不良风险很高,因为67%的患者患有白血病或淋巴瘤,19%的发热事件发生在自体骨髓或血液干细胞移植后,中性粒细胞减少的中位总持续时间为16天,研究纳入时的中位中性粒细胞计数为0.09×10⁹/L。两组患者在危险因素方面具有可比性。37%的发热事件中发现菌血症,16%为其他显微镜下记录的感染,26%为临床记录的感染。大多数(96次)发热事件可评估疗效。哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与头孢他啶加阿米卡星在成功率(81%对83%)、经验性加用万古霉素(42%对38%)、发热消退的中位时间(3.3天对2.9天)或抗生素治疗的中位持续时间(7.2天对7.4天)方面均未发现显著差异。没有患者死于感染。两种抗生素方案耐受性良好,仅1例患者因毒性(对哌拉西林/他唑巴坦皮肤过敏)而停止研究治疗。基于所遇到的107次发热事件,我们得出结论,哌拉西林/他唑巴坦是一种安全有效的单一疗法。为确定哌拉西林/他唑巴坦作为发热性中性粒细胞减少患者单一疗法的确切价值,有必要进行一项大型随机试验。

相似文献

1
Monotherapy with piperacillin/tazobactam versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as an empiric therapy for fever in neutropenic cancer patients.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦单药治疗与头孢他啶加阿米卡星联合治疗作为中性粒细胞减少癌症患者发热的经验性治疗。
Support Care Cancer. 1998 Jul;6(4):402-9. doi: 10.1007/s005200050184.
2
Meropenem plus amikacin versus piperacillin-tazobactam plus netilmicin as empiric therapy for high-risk febrile neutropenia in children.美罗培南联合阿米卡星与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦联合奈替米星作为儿童高危发热性中性粒细胞减少症的经验性治疗
Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2004 Mar;21(2):115-23. doi: 10.1080/08880010490277321.
3
Piperacillin/tazobactam plus tobramycin versus ceftazidime plus tobramycin as empiric therapy for fever in severely neutropenic patients.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦联合妥布霉素与头孢他啶联合妥布霉素作为严重中性粒细胞减少患者发热的经验性治疗
Support Care Cancer. 1999 Mar;7(2):89-94. doi: 10.1007/s005200050233.
4
Piperacillin-tazobactam versus carbapenem therapy with and without amikacin as empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia in cancer patients: results of an open randomized trial at a university hospital.哌拉西林他唑巴坦与碳青霉烯类药物联合或不联合阿米卡星作为癌症发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的经验性治疗:一项在大学医院进行的开放性随机试验结果。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug;40(8):761-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyq046. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
5
Cefepime plus amikacin versus piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin for initial antibiotic therapy in haematology patients with febrile neutropenia: results of an open, randomized, multicentre trial.头孢吡肟联合阿米卡星与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦联合阿米卡星用于血液科发热性中性粒细胞减少患者初始抗生素治疗:一项开放、随机、多中心试验的结果
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002 Jul;50(1):79-88. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkf087.
6
Piperacillin-tazobactam is more effective than ceftriaxone plus gentamicin in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies: a randomized comparison.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦在血液系统恶性肿瘤发热性中性粒细胞减少患者中比头孢曲松加庆大霉素更有效:一项随机对照比较。
Support Care Cancer. 2003 Jun;11(6):362-70. doi: 10.1007/s00520-003-0463-7. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
7
Piperacillin/tazobactam plus ceftazidime versus sulbactam/ampicillin plus aztreonam as empirical therapy for fever in severely neutropenic pediatric patients.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦联合头孢他啶与舒巴坦/氨苄西林联合氨曲南作为重度中性粒细胞减少儿科患者发热的经验性治疗方案比较
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2009 Apr;31(4):270-3. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e31819daf4a.
8
Piperacillin/tazobactam monotherapy versus piperacillin/tazobactam plus amikacin as initial empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia in children with acute leukemia.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦单药治疗与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦联合阿米卡星作为急性白血病患儿发热性中性粒细胞减少症初始经验性治疗的比较
Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011 May;28(4):311-20. doi: 10.3109/08880018.2011.557144.
9
Piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin as an initial empirical therapy of febrile neutropenia in paediatric cancer patients.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦联合阿米卡星作为儿童癌症患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症的初始经验性治疗方案。
Singapore Med J. 2008 Jan;49(1):26-30.
10
[Piperacilline/tazobactam combination+amikacin versus ceftazidime+amikacin in patients with neutropenia and fever. An open multicenter study. Groupe d'étude des Aplasies Fébriles].哌拉西林/他唑巴坦联合阿米卡星与头孢他啶联合阿米卡星治疗中性粒细胞减少伴发热患者的疗效比较。一项开放性多中心研究。发热性再生障碍性贫血研究组
Presse Med. 1995 Feb 25;24(8):397-401.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Review of Beta-Lactam vs. Beta-Lactam plus Aminoglycoside Combination Therapy in Neutropenic Cancer Patients.中性粒细胞减少的癌症患者中β-内酰胺类与β-内酰胺类加氨基糖苷类联合治疗的系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 19;16(10):1934. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101934.
2
The cost-effectiveness of empirical antibiotic treatments for high-risk febrile neutropenic patients: A decision analytic model.高危发热性中性粒细胞减少患者经验性抗生素治疗的成本效益:一项决策分析模型。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(20):e20022. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020022.
3
A Randomized, Open-Labeled, Prospective Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy of Frontline Empirical Intravenous Piperacillin/Tazobactam Monotherapy in Comparison with Ceftazidime Plus Amikacin for Febrile Neutropenia in Pediatric Oncology Patients.
一项随机、开放标签、前瞻性对照研究,旨在评估一线经验性静脉注射哌拉西林/他唑巴坦单药治疗与头孢他啶加阿米卡星治疗儿童肿瘤患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症的疗效比较。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Sep 1;20(9):2733-2737. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.9.2733.
4
A Comparative Study of Piperacillin-Tazobactam With and Without Vancomycin as Empirical Therapy for Febrile Neutropenic Patients With Solid Tumor Malignancies.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦联合或不联合万古霉素作为实体瘤恶性肿瘤发热性中性粒细胞减少患者经验性治疗的比较研究
World J Oncol. 2015 Feb;6(1):283-291. doi: 10.14740/wjon867w. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
5
Beta-lactam versus beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy in cancer patients with neutropenia.β-内酰胺类药物与β-内酰胺类-氨基糖苷类药物联合治疗癌症中性粒细胞减少症患者的疗效比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 29;2013(6):CD003038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003038.pub2.
6
Aminoglycoside-free interventional antibiotic management in patients undergoing haemopoietic stem cell transplantation.
GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip. 2010 Sep 21;5(2):Doc06. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000149.
7
Piperacillin-tazobactam in pediatric cancer patients younger than 25 months: a retrospective multicenter survey.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦在25个月以下儿童癌症患者中的应用:一项回顾性多中心调查。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Nov;26(11):801-6. doi: 10.1007/s10096-007-0382-5.
8
Piperacillin-tazobactam is more effective than ceftriaxone plus gentamicin in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies: a randomized comparison.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦在血液系统恶性肿瘤发热性中性粒细胞减少患者中比头孢曲松加庆大霉素更有效:一项随机对照比较。
Support Care Cancer. 2003 Jun;11(6):362-70. doi: 10.1007/s00520-003-0463-7. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
9
Piperacillin/tazobactam: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in moderate to severe bacterial infections.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦:对其用于中重度细菌感染的药物经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(11):1135-75. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119110-00006.
10
Clinical and economic considerations of empirical antibacterial therapy of febrile neutropenia in cancer.癌症患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症经验性抗菌治疗的临床与经济考量
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Oct;16(4):343-53. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199916040-00003.