Hess U, Böhme C, Rey K, Senn H J
Department C for Internal Medicine, Kantonsspital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Support Care Cancer. 1998 Jul;6(4):402-9. doi: 10.1007/s005200050184.
Between July 1993 and September 1996, 107 consecutive febrile episodes in 83 neutropenic cancer patients with a median age of 41 years were randomized to treatment either with piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g every 8 h i.v. or ceftazidime 2 g every 8 h plus amikacin 15 mg/kg i.v. per day. In the case of fever > 38 degrees C 48 h after initiation of the antibiotic therapy, vancomycin 500 mg every 6 h i.v. was added. The study population was at serious risk of a poor outcome, since 67% of the patients had leukemia or lymphoma, 19% of the febrile events occurred after autologous bone marrow or blood stem cell transplantation, the median total duration of neutropenia was 16 days, and the median neutrophil count at study inclusion was 0.09 x 10(9)/1. The two patient groups were comparable in terms of risk factors. Bacteremia was found in 37%, other microscopically documented infections in 16%, and clinically documented infections in 26% of the febrile episodes. Most (96) febrile episodes were evaluable for response. No significant difference was found between piperacillin/ tazobactam and ceftazidime plus amikacin in terms of success rate (81% versus 83%), empirical addition of vancomycin (42% versus 38%), median time to fever defervescence (3.3 versus 2.9 days) or median duration of antibiotic therapy (7.2 versus 7.4 days). No patient died from the infection. Both antibiotic regimens were well tolerated, the study treatment being stopped only in 1 patient because of toxicity (cutaneous allergy to piperacillin/tazobactam). On the basis of the 107 febrile events encountered, we conclude that piperacillin/tazobactam is a safe and effective monotherapy. To define the definitive value of piperacillin/ tazobactam as a monotherapy for febrile neutropenic patients a large randomized trial is warranted.
1993年7月至1996年9月期间,83例中性粒细胞减少的癌症患者连续出现107次发热,这些患者的中位年龄为41岁,被随机分为两组进行治疗,一组接受静脉注射哌拉西林/他唑巴坦4.5 g,每8小时1次;另一组接受静脉注射头孢他啶2 g,每8小时1次,加阿米卡星15 mg/kg,每日1次。如果抗生素治疗开始后48小时体温>38摄氏度,则加用静脉注射万古霉素500 mg,每6小时1次。研究人群预后不良风险很高,因为67%的患者患有白血病或淋巴瘤,19%的发热事件发生在自体骨髓或血液干细胞移植后,中性粒细胞减少的中位总持续时间为16天,研究纳入时的中位中性粒细胞计数为0.09×10⁹/L。两组患者在危险因素方面具有可比性。37%的发热事件中发现菌血症,16%为其他显微镜下记录的感染,26%为临床记录的感染。大多数(96次)发热事件可评估疗效。哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与头孢他啶加阿米卡星在成功率(81%对83%)、经验性加用万古霉素(42%对38%)、发热消退的中位时间(3.3天对2.9天)或抗生素治疗的中位持续时间(7.2天对7.4天)方面均未发现显著差异。没有患者死于感染。两种抗生素方案耐受性良好,仅1例患者因毒性(对哌拉西林/他唑巴坦皮肤过敏)而停止研究治疗。基于所遇到的107次发热事件,我们得出结论,哌拉西林/他唑巴坦是一种安全有效的单一疗法。为确定哌拉西林/他唑巴坦作为发热性中性粒细胞减少患者单一疗法的确切价值,有必要进行一项大型随机试验。