• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A comparison of the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of felodipine IV and nifedipine IV in patients with hypertensive crisis or emergency not responding to oral nifedipine.

作者信息

Risler T, Bohm R, Wetzchewald D, Nast H P, Koch H H, Stein G, Erley C M

机构信息

Section of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Jun;54(4):295-8. doi: 10.1007/s002280050462.

DOI:10.1007/s002280050462
PMID:9696952
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A clinical definition of a hypertensive emergency is excessively high blood pressure in the presence of symptoms indicating end organ damage. Equally high blood pressure without symptoms is called a hypertensive crisis. Patients with hypertensive crisis or emergency need prompt, effective, and specific therapy and a controlled reduction of blood pressure.

METHODS

We performed a randomized, double-blind multi-centre study, to compare the safety, efficacy and tolerability of an intravenous (i.v.) infusion of two dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (either nifedipine or felodipine) in 122 patients, of whom 63 were diagnosed as hypertensive emergencies and 59 as hypertensive crisis, who had not reacted adequately (diastolic blood pressure <115 mmHg) to 5 mg of nifedipine PO.

RESULTS

Both drugs lowered blood pressure adequately in more than 90% of the patients and were well tolerated. Only one patient had to be withdrawn, because of an excessive decrease in blood pressure.

CONCLUSION

Patients with excessively high blood pressure who do not react to oral nifedipine can be treated equally effectively with felodipine and nifedipine IV. Felodipine is easier to handle because of its lack of light sensitivity.

摘要

相似文献

1
A comparison of the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of felodipine IV and nifedipine IV in patients with hypertensive crisis or emergency not responding to oral nifedipine.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Jun;54(4):295-8. doi: 10.1007/s002280050462.
2
Comparative effect of lercanidipine, felodipine, and nifedipine GITS on blood pressure and heart rate in patients with mild to moderate arterial hypertension: the Lercanidipine in Adults (LEAD) Study.乐卡地平、非洛地平与硝苯地平控释片对轻至中度动脉高血压患者血压及心率的比较作用:成人乐卡地平(LEAD)研究
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2003 Jul-Aug;5(4):249-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2003.01960.x.
3
Control of blood pressure in hypertensive patients with felodipine extended release or nifedipine retard.用非洛地平缓释片或硝苯地平缓释片控制高血压患者的血压
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1990 Dec;30(6):871-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1990.tb05453.x.
4
Differential effects of felodipine and nifedipine on 24-h blood pressure and left ventricular mass.非洛地平和硝苯地平对24小时血压及左心室质量的不同影响。
Am J Hypertens. 1995 Jul;8(7):712-8. doi: 10.1016/0895-7061(95)00117-8.
5
Twenty-four-hour blood pressure monitoring during treatment with extended-release felodipine versus slow-release nifedipine in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study.老年轻至中度高血压患者使用缓释非洛地平与缓释硝苯地平治疗期间的24小时血压监测:一项随机、双盲、交叉研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;53(2):95-100. doi: 10.1007/s002280050344.
6
Comparative effects of felodipine ER, amlodipine and nifedipine GITS on 24 h blood pressure control and trough to peak ratios in mild to moderate ambulatory hypertension: a forced titration study.非洛地平缓释片、氨氯地平和硝苯地平控释片对轻至中度动态高血压患者24小时血压控制及谷峰比值的比较效应:一项强制滴定研究。
Can J Cardiol. 1998 May;14(5):682-8.
7
[Antihypertensive effect of felodipine, a new calcium antagonist].新型钙拮抗剂非洛地平的降压作用
Nihon Yakurigaku Zasshi. 1992 Nov;100(5):453-62. doi: 10.1254/fpj.100.453.
8
Efficacy and safety of barnidipine compared with felodipine in the treatment of hypertension in Chinese patients.
J Int Med Res. 2002 May-Jun;30(3):330-6. doi: 10.1177/147323000203000317.
9
Calcium antagonists, a useful additional therapy in treatment resistant hypertension: comparison of felodipine ER and nifedipine Retard by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.钙拮抗剂,难治性高血压的一种有效辅助治疗方法:通过24小时动态血压监测比较缓释非洛地平和硝苯地平控释片
Neth J Med. 1997 Jan;50(1):2-12. doi: 10.1016/s0300-2977(96)00077-0.
10
Cross-over comparison of nifedipine Oros and felodipine extended release with blind 24 h ambulatory blood pressure assessments.硝苯地平渗透泵片与非洛地平缓释片的交叉比较及24小时动态血压盲法评估
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1999 Nov;26(11):909-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1681.1999.03164.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacological interventions for hypertensive emergencies.高血压急症的药物治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;2008(1):CD003653. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003653.pub3.
2
Renal artery stenosis as a cause of renal impairment: implications for treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure.肾动脉狭窄作为肾功能损害的一个原因:对高血压和充血性心力衰竭治疗的影响。
J R Soc Med. 1999 Oct;92(10):505-10. doi: 10.1177/014107689909201004.