Suppr超能文献

贝克抑郁量表随时间推移是否可靠?对非临床大学生样本中多次重测信度的评估。

Is the Beck Depression Inventory reliable over time? An evaluation of multiple test-retest reliability in a nonclinical college student sample.

作者信息

Ahava G W, Iannone C, Grebstein L, Schirling J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1998 Apr;70(2):222-31. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa7002_3.

Abstract

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is one of the most widely used measures of depression. Many studies have examined the reliability and validity of the BDI. However, we found no published studies that considered the stability of the BDI over multiple administrations (i.e., more than 3 trials), such as is common in clinical trials research and during some clinical interventions. The purpose of this study is to examine the multiple test-retest reliability of the BDI in a presumably nonclinical sample. Results show a 40% decline in BDI scores over 8 weeks, a main effect that accounts for approximately 10% of the variance. We achieved a 40% decrease in self-reported symptoms of depression due to repeated measurement alone, not due to any intervention. This change likely represents measurement error with this instrument rather than any "real" change in depression. The limitations of this study, its implications for research, and its applications to clinical practice are discussed.

摘要

贝克抑郁量表(BDI)是使用最广泛的抑郁测量工具之一。许多研究都检验了BDI的信度和效度。然而,我们发现没有已发表的研究考虑过BDI在多次施测(即超过3次测试)中的稳定性,而这在临床试验研究和一些临床干预中很常见。本研究的目的是检验BDI在一个假定的非临床样本中的多次重测信度。结果显示,8周内BDI得分下降了40%,这一主要效应约占方差的10%。仅由于重复测量,而非任何干预,我们就使自我报告的抑郁症状减少了40%。这种变化可能代表了该工具的测量误差,而非抑郁的任何“真实”变化。本文讨论了本研究的局限性、其对研究的启示以及在临床实践中的应用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验