Investigator bias in bereavement research: ethical and methodological implications.
作者信息
Cook A S
机构信息
Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA.
出版信息
Can J Nurs Res. 1997 Winter;29(4):87-93.
PMID:9697437
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Investigator bias in bereavement research: ethical and methodological implications.丧亲之痛研究中的研究者偏差：伦理与方法学意义
Can J Nurs Res. 1997 Winter;29(4):87-93.
2
Self-as-instrument in qualitative research.质性研究中的自我即工具
Nurs Res. 1993 Sep-Oct;42(5):300-1.
3
Nursing scholars appropriating new methods: the use of discourse analysis in scholarly nursing journals 1996-2003.护理学者采用新方法：1996 - 2003年学术护理期刊中话语分析的运用
Nurs Inq. 2005 Mar;12(1):27-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2005.00249.x.
4
Qualitative research: data analysis techniques.定性研究：数据分析技术
Prof Nurse. 1999 May;14(8):531-3.
5
[Value of qualitative research in nursing practices].[质性研究在护理实践中的价值]
Rech Soins Infirm. 2000 Jun(61):23-30.
6
The various aspects of qualitative research.定性研究的各个方面。
Curationis. 2000 Jun;23(2):3.
7
Justifying qualitative research.为定性研究辩护。
Res Nurs Health. 2008 Jun;31(3):193-5. doi: 10.1002/nur.20272.
8
Ethical dilemmas in qualitative research: how do we respect autonomy?定性研究中的伦理困境：我们如何尊重自主性？
Br J Theatre Nurs. 1993 Jan;2(10):S1-5.
9
Navigating uncharted water: research ethics and emotional engagement in human inquiry.探索未知领域：人类研究中的研究伦理与情感投入。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2006 Aug;13(4):423-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2006.00999.x.
10
Rigor or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited.严谨性或尸僵：再探定性研究中的严谨性问题
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1993 Dec;16(2):1-8. doi: 10.1097/00012272-199312000-00002.
Zotero 插件